Sludge characteristics and their contribution to microfiltration in submerged membrane bioreactors

This study focused on the physicochemical and biological characteristics of sludge in submerged membrane bioreactors (MBRs) at various sludge retention times (SRT) and their effect on microfiltration and membrane fouling. Three lab-scale submerged MBRs at SRT of 20, 40, and 60 days were performed at a constant permeate flux of 9 l/(m2 h) with hollow fiber microfiltration membranes (hydrophilized polypropylene; nominal pore size=0.4 μm). In order to evaluate the relative contribution of microbial floc and supernatant to the membrane fouling, supernatant was separated from the sludge by centrifugation at 366 rad/s for 5 min. Batch filtration experiments with the same configuration showed that the relative contribution of supernatant to overall membrane fouling was higher at SRT of 20 days (37%) than at SRT of 40 (28%) and 60 days (29%), whereas the overall fouling resistance increased as SRT prolonged. Hydrophobicity (correlation coefficient, r=0.86; significant value, P<0.05), surface charge (r=0.87, P<0.05) and microbial activity (r=−0.87, P<0.05), which were related to composition and properties of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), appeared key parameters relating to fouling by microbial floc. However, no remarkable factor was found in fouling caused by supernatant.

[1]  K Brindle,et al.  The application of membrane biological reactors for the treatment of wastewaters. , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[2]  I. Droppo,et al.  Composition of extracellular polymeric substances in the activated sludge floc matrix , 1998 .

[3]  Y. Magara,et al.  The Effect of Operational Factors on Solid/Liquid Separation by Ultra-Membrane Filtration in a Biological Denitrification System for Collected Human Excreta Treatment Plants , 1991 .

[4]  E. Perdue,et al.  Three approaches for characterizing NOM , 1996 .

[5]  Michel Y. Jaffrin,et al.  Contribution of various constituents of activated sludge to membrane bioreactor fouling , 2000 .

[6]  C. F. Forster,et al.  A comparative study of the nature of biopolymers extracted from anaerobic and activated sludges , 1990 .

[7]  J. Block,et al.  Hydrophobicity of activated sludge flocs and laboratory-grown bacteria , 1994 .

[8]  B. Logan,et al.  Molecular Size Distributions of Dissolved Organic Matter , 1990 .

[9]  F. Smith,et al.  Colorimetric Method for Determination of Sugars and Related Substances , 1956 .

[10]  M. Jaffrin,et al.  Reversibility of fouling formed in activated sludge filtration , 1999 .

[11]  O. H. Lowry,et al.  Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. , 1951, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[12]  H. Iwabu,et al.  Domestic wastewater reuse using a submerged membrane bioreactor , 1996 .

[13]  E. I. Vargha-Butler,et al.  Semiautomatic measurement of contact angles on cell layers by a modified axisymmetric drop shape analysis , 1989 .

[14]  Chung‐Hak Lee,et al.  Comparison of the filtration characteristics between attached and suspended growth microorganisms in submerged membrane bioreactor. , 2001, Water research.

[15]  K. Keiding,et al.  Extraction of extracellular polymers from activated sludge using a cation exchange resin , 1996 .

[16]  M. Okada,et al.  Ultrafiltration behaviour of extracellular and metabolic products in activated sludge system with UF separation process , 2000 .

[17]  Moshe Sheintuch,et al.  Steady state modeling of reactor-settler interaction , 1987 .