Limitations of a Bidirectional Control Procedure for the Investigation of Imitation in Rats: Odour Cues on the Manipulandum

Magazine-trained observer rats confronted a conspecific demonstrator pushing a joystick to the right or to the left for food reward before the observers were given access to the joystick from the position previously occupied by the demonstrator and rewarded for responses in both directions. For half of the observers (group 0), the joystick was in the same position when acted upon by demonstrators and observers; for the other half (group 180) the manipulandum was rotated 180° within its mounting between observation and test. As in previous experiments using this bidirectional control procedure, rats in group 0 showed demonstratorconsistent responding—that is, they pushed the joystick in the same direction, relative to the actor's body, as had their demonstrators. However, group 180 showed a reverse effect: reliable demonstrator-inconsistent responding. These results suggest that attractive odour or taste cues deposited by demonstrators on the side of the joystick contralateral to the direction of responding are sufficient to produce demonstrator-consistent responding in the bidirectional control procedure.

[1]  Michael E. Dawson,et al.  Observation and shaping learning: A comparison using Long Evans rats , 1969 .

[2]  B. Kohn,et al.  Observation and discrimination learning in the rat: Effects of stimulus substitution ☆ , 1976 .

[3]  C. Heyes,et al.  A Demonstration of Observational Learning in Rats using a Bidirectional Control , 1990, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[4]  C. Heyes,et al.  Imitation in Rats: Initial Responding and Transfer Evidence , 1992 .

[5]  G. Dawson,et al.  Observational extinction: Observation of nonreinforced responding reduces resistance to extinction in rats , 1993 .

[6]  Cecilia Heyes,et al.  Imitation in Rats: Conditions of Occurrence in a Bidirectional Control Procedure , 1994 .

[7]  G. R. Dawson,et al.  Imitation in rats (Rattus norvegicus): The role of demonstrator action , 1994, Behavioural Processes.

[8]  T R Zentall,et al.  Imitative learning in male Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) using the two-action method. , 1996, Journal of comparative psychology.

[9]  Effects of Isolation Rearing and Mirror Exposure on Social and Asocial Discrimination Performance , 1996 .

[10]  Jennifer E. Sutton,et al.  True Imitative Learning in Pigeons , 1996 .

[11]  Louis Lefebvre,et al.  Carib Grackles Imitate Conspecific and Zenaida Dove Tutors , 1997 .

[12]  Gardner Mr,et al.  Imitation : the methodological adequacy of directional control tests. , 1997 .

[13]  T. Bugnyar,et al.  Push or pull: an experimental study on imitation in marmosets , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  Cecilia Heyes,et al.  A two-object / two action test of simultaneous stimulus learning and response learning by observation in the European starling , 1999 .