Air injection into light and medium heavy oil reservoirs : combustion tube studies on west of Shetlands Clair oil and light Australian oil

Four combustion tube tests were performed at a high initial water saturation using Bath University's High Pressure Combustion Tube Facility. Two tests were conducted on Clair medium heavy oil (19.8°API) at 75 and 100 bar pressure, with initial oil saturations of 48% and 60%, at 80°C initial bed temperature. Maximum combustion temperatures exceeded 600°C during the early period, settling down to around 400°C. The combusted zone extended over about 30% of the sandpack length. Oil recovery was mainly affected by the large steam flood generated ahead of the combustion front, due to in situ vapourization of the original water in place, reducing the oil residual down to 21%. The thermal cracking reactions taking place ahead of combustion front converted part of the residual oil to lighter components, which were displaced with the gas flow, at the same time producing about 10% coke (fuel) for the combustion process. Two tests were carried out on a light Australian oil (38.8°API), starting at low initial oil residuals of So = 41 and 45%, at an operating pressure of 70 bar and initial bed temperature of 63°C. The combustion temperature was about 250°C in both tests. The axial temperature profile in the sand pack was similar to that normally associated with a moving combustion front, but at a relatively low temperature. Also, there was no steam plateau condition, which was very observable in the Clair oil tests. High combustion front velocities were achieved in all four tests, varying from 0.15 to 0.31m h–1. Fuel consumption, air requirement and oxygen utilization were generally favourable as regards improved oil recovery.

[1]  M. Greaves,et al.  Recent Laboratory Results of THAI and Its Comparison with Other IOR Processes , 2000 .

[2]  J. Burger,et al.  Laboratory research on wet combustion , 1973 .

[3]  R. Gordon Moore,et al.  A model for improved analysis of in-situ combustion tube tests , 1992 .

[4]  Mridul Kumar,et al.  An experimental investigation of the fireflooding combustion zone , 1991 .

[5]  D. V. Yannimaras,et al.  Laboratory Testing and Simulation Results for High Pressure Air Injection in a Waterflooded North Sea Oil Reservoir , 1997 .

[6]  S. Sakthikumar,et al.  An investigation of the feasibility of air injection into a waterflooded light oil reservoir , 1995 .

[7]  V. K. Kumar,et al.  Estimation of Recovery Factor in Light-Oil Air-Injection Projects , 1997 .

[8]  R. L. Reed,et al.  Some Effects of Pressure on Forward and Reverse Combustion , 1963 .

[9]  M. Durandeau,et al.  Laboratory Studies for Light Oil Air Injection Projects : Potential Application in Handil Field , 1999 .

[10]  L. Lake,et al.  Enhanced Oil Recovery , 2017 .

[11]  M. R. Fassihi,et al.  Economics of Light Oil Air Injection Projects , 1996 .

[12]  Jacques Burger,et al.  Thermal Methods of Oil Recovery , 1985 .

[13]  R. Field,et al.  In situ combustion studies of North Sea Forties and Maya crude oils , 1987 .

[14]  J. Speight Hydrocracking: Reactions, Catalysts, and Processes , 1997 .

[15]  D. W. Bennion,et al.  The thermal behavior of vertically-operated near-adiabatic in-situ combustion tubes , 1990 .

[16]  Robert Gordon Moore,et al.  Laboratory Combustion Behaviour Of Countess B Light Oil , 1991 .

[17]  M. R. Fassihi,et al.  The Use of Air Injection To Improve the Double Displacement Processes , 1993 .

[18]  D. Tiffin,et al.  High Pressure Combustion Tube Performance of Light Oils , 1995 .