The defibrillator in acute myocardial infarction trial (DINAMIT): study protocol.

BACKGROUND The implantable cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD) has been shown to be superior to antiarrhythmic drug therapy for the secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death. Its role in the primary prevention of sudden death after myocardial infarction is unknown. Methods and Results The Defibrillator in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial (DINAMIT) is a randomized, open-label, parallel-group comparison of ICD therapy versus no ICD therapy in selected survivors of acute myocardial infarction. It will test the hypothesis that reduction of sudden arrhythmogenic death by means of the ICD will result in reduction of overall mortality rates in patients at high risk after acute myocardial infarction. Accordingly, this international multicenter study aims to enroll patients shortly after their infarction (day 6 to day 40) who have reduced left ventricular function (left ventricular ejection fraction </=0. 35) and impairment of cardiac autonomic function shown by depressed heart rate variability (standard deviation of normal-to-normal R-R intervals </=70 ms) or elevated average 24-hour heart rate (mean 24-hour R-R interval </=750 ms, assessed by Holter monitoring). Patients will be followed for approximately 3 years on average with subsequent data analysis based on the intent-to-treat principle. Primary outcome is all-cause death. The trial is expected to be completed in 2003. CONCLUSIONS DINAMIT is the first prospective study to evaluate the benefit of ICD therapy for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients at high risk after acute myocardial infarction.

[1]  M Gent,et al.  Canadian implantable defibrillator study (CIDS) : a randomized trial of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator against amiodarone. , 2000, Circulation.

[2]  K. Lee,et al.  A randomized study of the prevention of sudden death in patients with coronary artery disease. Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial Investigators. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  S. Hohnloser,et al.  Assessment of QT dispersion for prediction of mortality or arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction: results of a prospective, long-term follow-up study. , 1998, Circulation.

[4]  J. Bigger,et al.  Baroreflex sensitivity and heart-rate variability in prediction of total cardiac mortality after myocardial infarction , 1998, The Lancet.

[5]  M. Keller,et al.  A comparison of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  M. Janse,et al.  Effect of prophylactic amiodarone on mortality after acute myocardial infarction and in congestive heart failure: meta-analysis of individual data from 6500 patients in randomised trials , 1997, The Lancet.

[7]  S. Connolly,et al.  Randomised trial of outcome after myocardial infarction in patients with frequent or repetitive ventricular premature depolarisations: CAMIAT , 1997, The Lancet.

[8]  A. Moss,et al.  Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial Investigators. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  M. Lesh,et al.  Autonomic nervous system and sudden cardiac death. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  M. Malik,et al.  Predictive power of increased heart rate versus depressed left ventricular ejection fraction and heart rate variability for risk stratification after myocardial infarction. Results of a two-year follow-up study. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  S. Hohnloser,et al.  Open infarct artery, late potentials, and other prognostic factors in patients after acute myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era. A prospective trial. , 1994, Circulation.

[12]  R. Myerburg,et al.  Sudden Cardiac Death: Epidemiology, Transient Risk, and Intervention Assessment , 1993, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  J. Miller,et al.  Decreased heart rate variability and its association with increased mortality after acute myocardial infarction. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.

[14]  J P Miller,et al.  The relationships among ventricular arrhythmias, left ventricular dysfunction, and mortality in the 2 years after myocardial infarction. , 1984, Circulation.

[15]  L E Hinkle,et al.  Clinical Classification of Cardiac Deaths , 1982, Circulation.

[16]  N. Mantel Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. , 1966, Cancer chemotherapy reports.

[17]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[18]  A. Maggioni,et al.  RELEVANCE OF HEART RATE AS A PROGNOSTIC FACTOR IN MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION : THE GISSI EXPERIENCE , 1999 .

[19]  S. Hohnloser,et al.  Identification of patients after myocardial infarction at risk of life-threatening arrhythmias , 1999 .