Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: Evaluation of main presentations on magnetic resonance imaging compared with findings on mammogram and histology.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the various morphologies and kinetic characteristics of the ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exam, to establish which are the most prevalent and to determine the effectiveness of the method in the detection of DCIS. METHOD A prospective observational study, starting in May 2014. We evaluated 25 consecutive patients with suspicious or highly suspicious microcalcifications on mammography screening, BI-RADS categories 4 and 5, who underwent breast MRI and then surgery with proven diagnosis of pure DCIS. Surgery was considered the gold standard for correlation between histologic findings and radiological findings obtained on MRI. RESULTS The most frequent morphological characteristic of DCIS on MRI was non-mass-like enhancement (NMLE), p<0.001, observed in 22/25 (88%) patients (95CI 72.5-100). Of these, segmental distribution was the most prevalent, represented by 9/22 (40.91%) cases (95CI 17.4-64.4), p=0.306, and a clumped internal enhancement pattern was most commonly characterized in DCIS, observed in 13/22 (50.09%) cases. CONCLUSION DCIS has a wide variety of imaging features on MRI and being able to recognize these lesions is crucial. Its most common morphological presentation is non-mass-like enhancement, while segmental distribution and a clumped internal enhancement pattern are the most common presentations. Faced with the combined analysis of these findings, percutaneous core needle biopsy (core biopsy) or vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) should be encouraged.

[1]  S. Edge,et al.  Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features. , 1995, Radiology.

[2]  Wendy B DeMartini,et al.  BI‐RADS MRI Enhancement Characteristics of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ , 2007, The breast journal.

[3]  S. Duffy,et al.  Mammographic screening and "overdiagnosis". , 2011, Radiology.

[4]  O Lucidarme,et al.  Clustered breast microcalcifications: evaluation by dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI. , 1996, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[5]  W. P. Evans,et al.  Three-dimensional RODEO breast MR imaging of lesions containing ductal carcinoma in situ. , 1996, Radiology.

[6]  S. Swain,et al.  Ductal carcinoma in situ, complexities and challenges. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[7]  M. Schnall,et al.  MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. , 1997, Radiology.

[8]  L. Liberman,et al.  Determination of the Presence and Extent of Pure Ductal Carcinoma in Situ by Mammography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2005, The breast journal.

[9]  G. Newstead MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. , 2010, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[10]  C. Boetes,et al.  False-negative MR imaging of malignant breast tumors , 1997, European Radiology.

[11]  M D Schnall,et al.  Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy. , 1995, Radiology.

[12]  C. Lehman Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ. , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[13]  K. Scheidhauer,et al.  FDG PET and other imaging modalities in the primary diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[14]  Anthony J. Guidi,et al.  Vascular permeability factor (Vascular endothelial growth factor) expression and angiogenesis in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast , 1997, Cancer.

[15]  U. Fischer,et al.  MR imaging of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications: is there any value? , 1998, Radiology.

[16]  J O Barentsz,et al.  Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. , 1995, Radiology.

[17]  A. Abramson,et al.  Ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic findings and clinical implications. , 1989, Radiology.

[18]  O Lucidarme,et al.  Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. , 1994, Radiology.

[19]  W. Lawrence,et al.  Intraductal "noninfiltrating" carcinoma of the breast. , 1976, Archives of surgery.

[20]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[21]  Simone Schrading,et al.  MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study , 2007, The Lancet.

[22]  Min-Ying Su,et al.  Characterization of Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging: Do Nonhigh Grade and High Grade Show Different Imaging Features? , 2010, Journal of oncology.

[23]  L Duchateau,et al.  Risk factors for recurrence and metastasis after breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma-in-situ: analysis of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 10853. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  Thomas Beier,et al.  Undetected malignancies of the breast: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging at 1.0 T. , 2002, Radiology.

[25]  L. Tabár,et al.  Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. , 2011, Radiology.

[26]  L. Kalisher,et al.  Breast MR imaging with commercially available techniques: radiologic-pathologic correlation. , 1995, Radiology.

[27]  Karel G M Moons,et al.  Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions. , 2008, Radiology.

[28]  J.,et al.  In situ and minimally invasive breast cancer : morphologic and kinetic features on contrast-enhanced MR imaging , 2022 .

[29]  G. Badan,et al.  Complete internal audit of a mammography service in a reference institution for breast imaging* , 2014, Radiologia brasileira.

[30]  C. Kuhl Why do purely intraductal cancers enhance on breast MR images? , 2009, Radiology.

[31]  R. Gilles,et al.  Ductal carcinoma in situ: MR imaging-histopathologic correlation. , 1995, Radiology.

[32]  Rebecca S Lewis,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. , 2004, Radiology.

[33]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic and morphologic MR characteristics compared with mammographic appearance and nuclear grade. , 2007, Radiology.