Measuring efficiency in Chinese commercial banks using a DEA model with undesirable output

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) approaches are widely utilised to measure the performance of commercial banks with considering multiple input and output variables. In order to attain accurate efficiency score, undesirable outputs such as bad loan are taken into consideration when evaluating the efficiency of commercial banks. However, the same problem arises within all the existing undesirable DEA approaches which have been utilised to measure the performance of commercial banks: the commercial banks can get higher efficiency scores if undesirable outputs are considered. This paper constructs a new undesirable DEA model for overcoming this dilemma. We also applied the new proposed models to investigate 15 main Chinese commercial banks from the year 2007 to 2010 for illustrating the use and advantages of it.

[1]  C. Barros,et al.  Technical efficiency in the Chinese banking sector , 2011 .

[2]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[3]  Olli-Pekka Hilmola,et al.  Analysing global railway passenger transport through two-staged efficiency model , 2010, Int. J. Inf. Decis. Sci..

[4]  N. Avkiran,et al.  Benchmarking firm performance from a multiple-stakeholder perspective with an application to Chinese banking , 2010 .

[5]  Fadzlan Sufian,et al.  Evolution in the efficiency of the Indonesian banking sector: a DEA approach , 2010 .

[6]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[7]  Allen N. Berger,et al.  Bank Ownership and Efficiency in China: What Will Happen in the World's Largest Nation? , 2006 .

[8]  John A. Haslem,et al.  DEA Efficiency Profiles of U.S. Banks Operating Internationally , 1999 .

[9]  Russell G. Thompson,et al.  DEA/AR profit ratios and sensitivity of 100 large U.S. banks , 1997 .

[10]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Benchmarking with quality-adjusted DEA (Q-DEA) to seek lower-cost high-quality service: Evidence from a U.S.bank application , 2006, Ann. Oper. Res..

[11]  Ahmad Makui,et al.  A forecasting method in data envelopment analysis with group decision making , 2010 .

[12]  Peng Zhou,et al.  A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[14]  Concepción Román,et al.  Evaluating the service quality of major air carriers: a DEA approach , 2010 .

[15]  S. You,et al.  A new approach in modelling undesirable output in DEA model , 2011, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[16]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Ming-Miin Yu,et al.  Technical efficiency and impact of environmental regulations in farrow‐to‐finish swine production in Taiwan , 2008 .

[18]  N. Avkiran Association of DEA super-efficiency estimates with financial ratios: Investigating the case for Chinese banks , 2011 .

[19]  Holger Scheel,et al.  Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  Wen-Min Lu,et al.  A closer look at the economic-environmental disparities for regional development in China , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  Liang Liang,et al.  Fuzzy context-dependent data envelopment analysis , 2009, Int. J. Data Anal. Tech. Strateg..

[22]  Kym Brown,et al.  Banking efficiency in China: Application of DEA to pre- and post-deregulation eras: 1993-2000 , 2005 .

[23]  Zhongsheng Hua,et al.  Eco-efficiency analysis of paper mills along the Huai River: An extended DEA approach , 2007 .

[24]  Vadlamani Ravi,et al.  Indian banks' productivity ranking via Data Envelopment Analysis and Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision-Making hybrid , 2008, Int. J. Inf. Decis. Sci..

[25]  Shelagh A. Heffernan,et al.  Cost X-Efficiency in China's Banking Sector , 2005 .

[26]  Milind Sathye,et al.  Efficiency of banks in a developing economy: The case of India , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..