Influent Fractionation for Modeling Continuous Anaerobic Digestion Processes.

The first dynamic model developed to describe anaerobic digestion processes dates back to 1969. Since then, considerable improvements in identifying the underlying biochemical processes and associated microorganisms have been achieved. These have led to an increasing complexity of both model structure and the standard set of stoichiometric and kinetic parameters. Literature has always paid attention to kinetic parameter estimation, as this determines model accuracy with respect to predicting the dynamic behavior of biogas systems. As sufficient computing power is easily available nowadays, sophisticated linear and nonlinear parameter estimation techniques are applied to evaluate parameter uncertainty. However, the uncertainty of influent fractionation in these parameter optimization procedures is generally neglected. As anaerobic digestion systems are currently increasingly used to convert a broad variety of organic biomass to methane, the lack of generally accepted guidelines for input characterization adapted to the simulation model's characteristics is a considerable limitation of model application to these substrates. Directly after the introduction of the standardized Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 (ADM1), several publications pointed out that the model's requirement of a detailed influent characterization can hardly be fulfilled. The main shortcoming of the model application was addressed in the reliable and practical identification of the model's input state variables for particulate and soluble carbohydrates, proteins and lipids, as well as for the inerts. Several authors derived biomass characterization procedures, most of them dedicated to a particular substrate, and some of them being of general nature, but none of these approaches have resulted in a practical standard protocol so far. This review provides an overview of existing approaches that improve substrate influent characterization to be used for state of the art anaerobic digestion models.

[1]  R E Speece,et al.  Anaerobic fermentation of cattle manure: modeling of hydrolysis and acidogenesis. , 2007, Water research.

[2]  Manfred Lübken,et al.  Determination of methanogenic pathways through carbon isotope (δ13C) analysis for the two-stage anaerobic digestion of high-solids substrates. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  M de Gracia,et al.  ADM1-based methodology for the characterisation of the influent sludge in anaerobic reactors. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[4]  Sergey Kalyuzhnyi,et al.  Extension of Enaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 with processes of sulfate reduction , 2003, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[5]  R. B. Newell,et al.  Mathematical modelling of prefermenters—I. Model development and verification , 1999 .

[6]  John F. Andrews,et al.  Dynamic Model of the Anaerobic Digestion Process , 1969 .

[7]  Piotr Biernacki,et al.  Application of Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 for describing anaerobic digestion of grass, maize, green weed silage, and industrial glycerine. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[8]  D. Weichgrebe,et al.  Modified ADM1 for modelling an UASB reactor laboratory plant treating starch wastewater and synthetic substrate load tests. , 2014, Water research.

[9]  Y Y Li,et al.  Modified ADM1 structure for modelling municipal primary sludge hydrolysis. , 2008, Water research.

[10]  Godfrey Kyazze,et al.  ADM1 can be applied to continuous bio-hydrogen production using a variable stoichiometry approach. , 2008, Water research.

[11]  K H Rosenwinkel,et al.  Efficiency of the Activated Sludge Model no. 3 for German wastewater on six different WWTPs. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[12]  M Ogurek,et al.  Description of nitrogen incorporation and release in ADM1. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[13]  M. Metzker Sequencing technologies — the next generation , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[14]  Santiago García-Gen,et al.  Generalised modelling approach for anaerobic co-digestion of fermentable substrates. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[15]  Irini Angelidaki,et al.  Anaerobic thermophilic digestion of manure at different ammonia loads: Effect of temperature , 1994 .

[16]  Manfred Lübken,et al.  Parameter estimation and long-term process simulation of a biogas reactor operated under trace elements limitation , 2015 .

[17]  B. Larkins,et al.  New Methods for Extraction and Quantitation of Zeins Reveal a High Content of gamma-Zein in Modified opaque-2 Maize. , 1990, Plant physiology.

[18]  K. S. Creamer,et al.  Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[19]  P Pearce,et al.  Mechanical sludge disintegration for the production of carbon source for biological nutrient removal. , 2007, Water research.

[20]  Jean-Philippe Steyer,et al.  Prediction of anaerobic biodegradability and bioaccessibility of municipal sludge by coupling sequential extractions with fluorescence spectroscopy: towards ADM1 variables characterization. , 2014, Water research.

[21]  M Lübken,et al.  Investigations and mathematical simulation on decentralized anaerobic treatment of agricultural substrate from livestock farming. , 2008, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[22]  Ulf Jeppsson,et al.  Towards an ASM1 – ADM1 state variable interface for plant-wide wastewater treatment modeling , 2003 .

[23]  P. Pullammanappallil,et al.  Protein degradation during anaerobic wastewater treatment: derivation of stoichiometry , 2004, Biodegradation.

[24]  M C M van Loosdrecht,et al.  Critical analysis of some concepts proposed in ADM1. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[25]  I. C. Gunsalus CHAPTER IV – GROWTH OF BACTERIA , 1951 .

[26]  Emma Kreuger,et al.  Ensiling of crops for biogas production: effects on methane yield and total solids determination , 2011, Biotechnology for biofuels.

[27]  Konrad Koch,et al.  Alternative approach to estimate the hydrolysis rate constant of particulate material from batch data , 2014 .

[28]  M. Effenberger,et al.  Agricultural biogas production in Germany - from practice to microbiology basics , 2014 .

[29]  Izzet Ozturk,et al.  Model Based Evaluation for the Anaerobic Treatment of Corn Processing Wastewaters , 2007 .

[30]  J. Roger,et al.  Alternative methods for determining anaerobic biodegradability: A review , 2010 .

[31]  J P Steyer,et al.  Combination of batch experiments with continuous reactor data for ADM1 calibration: application to anaerobic digestion of pig slurry. , 2011, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[32]  Stefan Bauer,et al.  Rapid determination of cellulose. , 2014, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[33]  I. Angelidaki,et al.  Assessment of the anaerobic biodegradability of macropollutants , 2004 .

[34]  Alastair James Ward,et al.  Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy (NIRS) for rapid determination of biochemical methane potential of plant biomass , 2014 .

[35]  B. Ahring,et al.  Identifiability study of the proteins degradation model, based on ADM1, using simultaneous batch experiments. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[36]  R. Speece,et al.  Comparative process stability and efficiency of anaerobic digestion; mesophilic vs. thermophilic. , 2002, Water research.

[37]  D J Batstone,et al.  Estimation of hydrolysis parameters in full-scale anerobic digesters. , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[38]  J P Steyer,et al.  Modeling microbial diversity in anaerobic digestion. , 2008, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[39]  Izzet Ozturk,et al.  Applicability of Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 (ADM1) for a specific industrial wastewater: Opium alkaloid effluents , 2010 .

[40]  Wim Klaassen,et al.  The contribution of ocean‐leaving DMS to the global atmospheric burdens of DMS, MSA, SO2, and NSS SO4= , 2003 .

[41]  P. V. Soest,et al.  Use of Detergents in the Analysis of Fibrous Feeds. IV. Determination of Plant Cell-Wall Constituents , 1967 .

[42]  Manfred Lübken,et al.  Monofermentation of grass silage under mesophilic conditions: measurements and mathematical modeling with ADM 1. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[43]  Ulf Jeppsson,et al.  An ASM/ADM model interface for dynamic plant-wide simulation. , 2009, Water research.

[44]  Esperanza Jurado,et al.  ADM1-based modeling of anaerobic digestion of swine manure fibers pretreated with aqueous ammonia soaking , 2012 .

[45]  H. Siegrist,et al.  The IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No 1 (ADM1). , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[46]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  A Generalized Method for Thermodynamic State Analysis of Environmental Systems , 2010 .

[47]  J. Steyer,et al.  State indicators for monitoring the anaerobic digestion process. , 2010, Water research.

[48]  J. Healy,et al.  Anaerobic Biodegradation of Eleven Aromatic Compounds to Methane , 1979, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[49]  J. Steyer,et al.  A waste characterisation procedure for ADM1 implementation based on degradation kinetics. , 2012, Water research.

[50]  R Kleerebezem,et al.  Waste characterization for implementation in ADM1. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[51]  Derin Orhon,et al.  Dual hydrolysis model of the slowly biodegradable substrate in activated sludge systems , 1998 .

[52]  J P Steyer,et al.  A procedure to estimate proximate analysis of mixed organic wastes. , 2009, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[53]  J. Mata-Álvarez,et al.  Modified version of ADM1 model for agro-waste application. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[54]  Piotr Biernacki,et al.  Application of Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 for describing an existing biogas power plant , 2013 .

[55]  Manfred Lübken,et al.  Microbiological fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass: current state and prospects of mathematical modeling , 2010, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[56]  Mogens Henze,et al.  Biological Wastewater Treatment: Principles, Modeling and Design , 2015 .

[57]  G. A. Ekama,et al.  Procedures for Determining Influent COD Fractions and the Maximum Specific Growth Rate of Heterotrophs in Activated Sludge Systems , 1986 .

[58]  G A Ekama Using bioprocess stoichiometry to build a plant-wide mass balance based steady-state WWTP model. , 2009, Water research.

[59]  Boubaker Fezzani,et al.  Extension of the anaerobic digestion model No. 1 (ADM1) to include phenolic compounds biodegradation processes for the simulation of anaerobic co-digestion of olive mill wastes at thermophilic temperature. , 2009, Journal of hazardous materials.

[60]  Liliana Delgadillo-Mirquez,et al.  A new dynamic model for bioavailability and cometabolism of micropollutants during anaerobic digestion. , 2011, Water research.

[61]  J. Heider,et al.  Anaerobic metabolism of aromatic compounds. , 1997, European journal of biochemistry.

[62]  T. R. Sreekrishnan,et al.  Modelling anaerobic biofilm reactors--a review. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[63]  G Lyberatos,et al.  Application of ADM1 for the simulation of anaerobic digestion of olive pulp under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[64]  Manfred Lübken,et al.  Mono fermentation of grass silage by means of loop reactors. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[65]  R. Guo,et al.  Modeling anaerobic digestion of blue algae: stoichiometric coefficients of amino acids acidogenesis and thermodynamics analysis. , 2014, Water research.

[66]  M Lübken,et al.  Development of an empirical mathematical model for describing and optimizing the hygiene potential of a thermophilic anaerobic bioreactor treating faeces. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[67]  Raymond C. Loehr,et al.  Agricultural Waste Management: Problems, Processes, and Approaches , 1974 .

[68]  R Otterpohl,et al.  Parameter analysis of the IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 for the anaerobic digestion of blackwater with kitchen refuse. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[69]  Tai-Hua Mu,et al.  The amino acid composition, solubility and emulsifying properties of sweet potato protein , 2009 .

[70]  Albrecht E. Melchinger,et al.  Kinetics of methane fermentation yield in biogas reactors: genetic variation and association with chemical composition in maize. , 2012 .

[71]  Ulf Jeppsson,et al.  Continuity-based interfacing of models for wastewater systems described by Petersen matrices. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[72]  Ke Fan,et al.  What is the minimum number of letters required to fold a protein? , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[73]  Loris Nanni,et al.  Prediction of protein structure classes by incorporating different protein descriptors into general Chou's pseudo amino acid composition. , 2014, Journal of theoretical biology.

[74]  Alain Vande Wouwer,et al.  Model selection, identification and validation in anaerobic digestion: a review. , 2011, Water research.

[75]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[76]  Stephan Noack,et al.  New type of dry substances content meter using microwaves for application in biogas plants , 2005, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[77]  M Lübken,et al.  Thermophilic anaerobic digestion in compact systems: investigations by modern microbiological techniques and mathematical simulation. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[78]  F. Mosey Mathematical Modelling of the Anaerobic Digestion Process: Regulatory Mechanisms for the Formation of Short-Chain Volatile Acids from Glucose , 1983 .

[79]  B. Eggum,et al.  Nutritional value of some Czechoslovak varieties of wheat, triticale and rye , 1990 .

[80]  H Kroiss,et al.  Aeration of anaerobically digested sewage sludge for COD and nitrogen removal: optimization at large-scale. , 2008, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[81]  W. Zollitsch,et al.  Biogas production from maize and dairy cattle manure - influence of biomass composition on the methane yield. , 2007 .

[82]  A. Willis,et al.  The estimation of carbohydrates in plant extracts by anthrone. , 1954, The Biochemical journal.

[83]  Mandy Schönberg,et al.  The influence of the temperature regime on the formation of methane in a two‐phase anaerobic digestion process , 2012 .

[84]  Irini Angelidaki,et al.  Monitoring and control of the biogas process based on propionate concentration using online VFA measurement. , 2008, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[85]  J. A. Servizi,et al.  Free Energy as a Parameter in Biological Treatment , 1963 .

[86]  Kim H. Esbensen,et al.  Representative sampling for process analytical characterization of heterogeneous bioslurry systems—a reference study of sampling issues in PAT , 2006 .

[87]  Adrian Covaci,et al.  Comparative study on total lipid determination using Soxhlet, Roese-Gottlieb, bligh & dyer, and modified bligh & dyer extraction methods , 2001 .

[88]  Laurent Lardon,et al.  Modeling anaerobic digestion of microalgae using ADM1. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[89]  Damien J. Batstone,et al.  Mathematical Modelling of Anaerobic Reactors Treating Domestic Wastewater: Rational Criteria for Model Use , 2006 .

[90]  Manfred Lübken,et al.  Modelling the energy balance of an anaerobic digester fed with cattle manure and renewable energy crops. , 2007, Water research.

[91]  Jiang Zhanpeng,et al.  Anaerobic biodegradability of aliphatic compounds and their quantitative structure biodegradability relationship. , 2004, The Science of the total environment.

[92]  M. C. Tomei,et al.  Modeling of Anaerobic Digestion of Sludge , 2009 .

[93]  Irini Angelidaki,et al.  Anaerobic digestion model No. 1 (ADM1) , 2002 .

[94]  D. Updegraff Semimicro determination of cellulose in biological materials. , 1969, Analytical biochemistry.

[95]  J M Lema,et al.  Variable stoichiometry with thermodynamic control in ADM1. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[96]  Joan Mata-Álvarez,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes. An overview of research achievements and perspectives , 2000 .

[97]  E. Becker Micro-algae as a source of protein. , 2007, Biotechnology advances.

[98]  U. Zaher,et al.  Interfacing the IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No.1 (ADM1) With Manure and Solid Waste Characteristics , 2006 .

[99]  Georg Cadisch,et al.  Carbon isotopic fractionation during decomposition of plant materials of different quality , 2003 .

[100]  A. Husain Mathematical models of the kinetics of anaerobic digestion--a selected review , 1998 .

[101]  Gatze Lettinga,et al.  UASB Process design for various types of wastewaters. , 1991 .

[102]  F. Blumensaat,et al.  Modelling of two-stage anaerobic digestion using the IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 (ADM1). , 2005, Water research.

[103]  Jean-Philippe Steyer,et al.  Modified ADM1 disintegration/hydrolysis structures for modeling batch thermophilic anaerobic digestion of thermally pretreated waste activated sludge. , 2009, Water research.

[104]  M D Luque de Castro,et al.  Soxhlet extraction: Past and present panacea. , 2010, Journal of chromatography. A.

[105]  María Carmen Veiga,et al.  Air Pollution Prevention and Control: Bioreactors and Bioenergy , 2013 .

[106]  O. H. Lowry,et al.  Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. , 1951, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[107]  K. Koch,et al.  Biogas from grass silage - Measurements and modeling with ADM1. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[108]  M. Dennstedt,et al.  Über den Abbau von Eiweiß. , 1906 .

[109]  Eberhard Hartung,et al.  NIRS-aided monitoring and prediction of biogas yields from maize silage at a full-scale biogas plant applying lumped kinetics. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[110]  Fezzani Boubaker,et al.  Modelling of the mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of olive mill wastewater with olive mill solid waste using anaerobic digestion model No. 1 (ADM1). , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[111]  J. Gossett,et al.  Anaerobic Digestion of Waste Activated Sludge , 1982 .

[112]  M. D. Luque de Castro,et al.  Soxhlet extraction of solid materials: an outdated technique with a promising innovative future , 1998 .