Accuracy of Frozen Section Analysis Versus Specimen Radiography During Breast-Conserving Surgery for Nonpalpable Lesions

BackgroundWhereas specimen radiography (SR) is an established strategy for intraoperative resection margin analysis during breast-conserving surgery for nonpalpable lesions, the use of frozen section analysis (FSA) is still a matter of debate.MethodsA retrospective review was conducted of 115 consecutive operations in which the two objectives sought were the excision of nonpalpable malignant lesions and breast conservation. Breast surgery was performed in the Gynecology and the Surgery Departments at the Basel University Hospital Breast Center. Whereas one department preferably uses SR for intraoperative margin assessments of lesions involving ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or atypical ductal hyperplasia, the other uses FSA to increase the rate of complete removal of these lesions with a single procedure. The respective accuracy and therapeutic impact of these two techniques are compared here.ResultsIntraoperative resection margin assessments were performed with FSA in 80 and SR in 35 of a total of 115 operations performed on 111 patients with pTis, pT1, or pT2 nonpalpable breast cancer. FSA diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 83.8%, 80.0%, and 87.5%, respectively, compared to 60%, 60%, and 60%, respectively, for SR. FSA tended to have a stronger therapeutic impact than SR in terms of the number of patients in whom initially positive margins were rendered margin-negative thanks to intraoperative analysis and immediate reexcision or mastectomy (27.5% vs. 14.3%; p = 0.124). More importantly, significantly fewer secondary reexcisions were performed in the FSA series than in the SR series (12.5% vs. 37.1%; p = 0.002). Finally, the intraoperative detection of invasive cancer with FSA led to a significantly lower number of secondary procedures for axillary lymph node staging (5% vs. 25.7%; p = 0.001).ConclusionsThe present results suggest that FSA may be more accurate than SR for analyzing intraoperative resection margins during breast-conserving surgery for nonpalpable lesions.

[1]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Incidence of and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. , 1996, JAMA.

[2]  B Fisher,et al.  Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  D. S. Lind,et al.  Minimizing local recurrence after breast conserving therapy using intraoperative shaved margins to determine pathologic tumor clearance. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[4]  S. Harms,et al.  Assessing margin status. , 1999, Surgical oncology.

[5]  C. Balch,et al.  AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed , 2002 .

[6]  B. E. F. Isher,et al.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. , 2002 .

[7]  P P Rosen,et al.  Pathological assessment of nonpalpable breast lesions. , 1991, Seminars in surgical oncology.

[8]  R. Arriagada,et al.  Conservative treatment versus mastectomy in early breast cancer: patterns of failure with 15 years of follow-up data. Institut Gustave-Roussy Breast Cancer Group. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  Kelly K. Hunt,et al.  Role for Intraoperative Margin Assessment in Patients Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery , 2007, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[10]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[11]  R. Rouzier,et al.  Specimen radiography as predictor of resection margin status in non-palpable breast lesions. , 2006, Clinical radiology.

[12]  D. Farley,et al.  Optimal management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. , 2003, Surgical oncology.

[13]  C. Compton,et al.  AJCC Cancer Staging Manual , 2002, Springer New York.

[14]  R. E. Snyder Specimen radiography and preoperative localization of nonpalpable breast cancer , 1980, Cancer.

[15]  A. Luini,et al.  Breast conservation is the treatment of choice in small breast cancer: long-term results of a randomized trial. , 1990, European journal of cancer.

[16]  E. Mason,et al.  The treatment of nonpalpable carcinoma of the breast , 1980, Cancer.

[17]  J. Cendan,et al.  Accuracy of intraoperative frozen-section analysis of breast cancer lumpectomy-bed margins. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[18]  D. Mahvi,et al.  The role of frozen section analysis of margins during breast conservation surgery. , 1997, The cancer journal from Scientific American.

[19]  P Okunieff,et al.  Ten-year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  H. Moch,et al.  Mammotome: Less Invasive than ABBI with Similar Accuracy for Early Breast Cancer Detection , 2005, World Journal of Surgery.