A comparison of male and female dually arrested domestic violence offenders.

This research provides information on dually arrested female defendants in domestic violence cases. The data comes from all heterosexual domestic violence cases resulting in a dual arrest from one large mid-South city during a 28-month period. Information on matched pairs of dually arrested male and female defendants (N = 317) came from multiple sources, including official criminal justice records (arrest reports and local criminal histories) as well as victim/offender interviews with both the arrestee and his/her partner. Comparisons were made between males and females in terms of their demographics, criminal histories, prior history of domestic violence (as both victim and offender), and behavior during the instant offense. Analyses revealed that these couples had ample contact, whether as victim or offender, with the criminal justice system. While there were no significant differences in partners' reports of minor and severe physical abuse, criminal justice date indicated that male arrestees demonstrated a significantly higher overall level of severity of violence than their female counterparts. Additionally, male arrestees had a more serious history of intimate partner and extrafamilial violence as well as other indicators of an antisocial lifestyle in comparison to female arrestees. To the extent that females in our cohort demonstrated less overall criminality and engaged in less severe domestic aggression, the idea of equivalency of violence between male and female arrestees must remain questionable.

[1]  L. Hamberger,et al.  Counseling Heterosexual Women Arrested for Domestic Violence: Implications for Theory and Practice , 1994, Violence and Victims.

[2]  Maureen McLeod Women against men: An examination of domestic violence based on an analysis of official data and national victimization data , 1984 .

[3]  R. Berk,et al.  The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. , 1984, American sociological review.

[4]  D. Kurz Old Problems and New Directions in the Study of Violence against Women , 1998 .

[5]  B. J. Morse Beyond the Conflict Tactics Scale: Assessing Gender Differences in Partner Violence , 1995, Violence and Victims.

[6]  D. Dutton,et al.  Assessment of Wife Assault with the Conflict Tactics Scale: Using Couple Data to Quantify the Differential Reporting Effect. , 1986 .

[7]  Lynette Feder Police Handling of Domestic and Nondomestic Assault Calls: Is There a Case for Discrimination? , 1998 .

[8]  R. Tolman The Validation of the Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory. , 1999, Violence and Victims.

[9]  D. Saunders The Tendency to Arrest Victims of Domestic Violence , 1995 .

[10]  Margaret Martin,et al.  Double Your Trouble: Dual Arrest in Family Violence , 1997, Journal of Family Violence.

[11]  P. Jaffe,et al.  The impact of police charges in incidents of wife abuse , 1986, Journal of Family Violence.

[12]  Eve S. Buzawa,et al.  Domestic Violence: The Criminal Justice Response , 1990 .

[13]  Frances P Lawrenz,et al.  Time series analysis of the effect of a domestic violence directive on the number of arrests per day , 1988 .

[14]  Delbert S. Elliott,et al.  THE ROLE OF ARREST IN DOMESTIC ASSAULT: THE OMAHA POLICE EXPERIMENT * , 1990 .

[15]  Ellen G. Cohn,et al.  The Impact of Research on Legal Policy: The Minneapolis Domestic Violence Experiment , 1989 .

[16]  J. Hirschel,et al.  Female spouse abuse and the police response: The Charlotte, North Carolina experiment , 1992 .

[17]  D. Kurz Corporal Punishment and Adult Use of Violence: A Critique of “Discipline and Deviance” , 1991 .

[18]  Michael D. Smith ENHANCING THE QUALITY OF SURVEY DATA ON VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN: , 1994 .

[19]  D. Vivian,et al.  Context for specific episodes of marital violence: Gender and severity of violence differences , 1995, Journal of Family Violence.

[20]  P. Tjaden,et al.  Prevalence and Consequences of Male-to-female and Female-to-male Intimate Partner Violence as Measured by the National Violence Against Women Survey , 2000 .

[21]  Richard A. Berk,et al.  A Bayesian Analysis of the Colorado Springs Spouse Abuse Experiment , 1992 .

[22]  R. Dobash,et al.  Separate and Intersecting Realities , 1998 .

[23]  Lynette Feder Domestic Violence and Police Response in a Pro-Arrest Jurisdiction , 1997 .

[24]  Christy A. Visher,et al.  Street-Level Justice: Situational Determinants of Police Arrest Decisions , 1981 .

[25]  S. Beach,et al.  Validity of self-reports of marital violence , 1987, Journal of Family Violence.

[26]  Lynette Feder Police Handling of Domestic Violence Calls: An Overview and Further Investigation , 1999 .

[27]  Lynette Feder,et al.  Police handling of domestic calls: The importance of offender's presence in the arrest decision , 1996 .

[28]  Susan L. Miller The Paradox of Women Arrested for Domestic Violence , 2001 .

[29]  S. Swan,et al.  A Typology of Women's Use of Violence in Intimate Relationships , 2002 .

[30]  M. Straus,et al.  Societal Change and Change in Family Violence from 1975 to 1985 As Revealed by Two National Surveys , 1986 .

[31]  Stuart M. Keeley,et al.  Police decision making in wife abuse: The impact of legal and extralegal factors , 1985 .

[32]  Kathleen J. Ferraro Policing Woman Battering , 1989 .

[33]  D. Kurz,et al.  SOCIAL SCIENCE PERSPECTIVES ON WIFE ABUSE: , 1989 .

[34]  K. O’leary,et al.  Interspousal reliability of reports of marital violence. , 1985, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[35]  F. Christopher,et al.  Premarital Abuse , 1982 .