Different rates of forgetting following study versus test trials

Two experiments investigated recall following two study conditions, (1) repeated test: a study trial followed by multiple recall trials, and (2) repeated study: multiple study trials with no tests. At a retention interval of 5 minutes, repeated study produced a higher level of recall than repeated test. When the retention interval was extended, forgetting was much more rapid in the study condition, with the repeated test manipulation leading to higher recall at an interval of 7 days. We conclude that study and test trials have different effects upon memory, with study trials promoting memory acquisition, and test trials enhancing the retrieval process itself, which protects against subsequent forgetting.

[1]  Observations On Comparing Rates of Forgetting : Comment on Loftus ( 1985 ) , 1985 .

[2]  M. Wheeler.  A Comparison of Forgetting Rates in Older and Younger Adults , 2000 .

[3]  D. Rubin,et al.  One Hundred Years of Forgetting : A Quantitative Description of Retention , 1996 .

[4]  William E. Hockley,et al.  Item versus associative information: Further comparisons of forgetting rates. , 1992 .

[5]  H. Pashler,et al.  The influence of retrieval on retention , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[6]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Disparate Effects of Repeated Testing: Reconciling Ballard's (1913) and Bartlett's (1932) Results , 1992 .

[7]  R. Schmidt,et al.  New Conceptualizations of Practice: Common Principles in Three Paradigms Suggest New Concepts for Training , 1992 .

[8]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation , 1992 .

[9]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Reflections of the Environment in Memory Form of the Memory Functions , 2022 .

[10]  Harry P. Bahrick,et al.  Preventive and corrective maintenance of access to knowledge , 1991 .

[11]  John T. Wixted,et al.  Analyzing the empirical course of forgetting. , 1990 .

[12]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[13]  John A. Glover,et al.  The "testing" phenomenon: Not gone but nearly forgotten. , 1989 .

[14]  John A. Glover,et al.  The "Testing" Phenomenon: Not Gone but Nearly Forgotten , 1989 .

[15]  Ulric Neisser,et al.  Remembering Reconsidered: Ecological and Traditional Approaches to the Study of Memory , 1990 .

[16]  H. P. Bahrick,et al.  Remembering reconsidered: The maintenance of marginal knowledge , 1988 .

[17]  M. L. Howe,et al.  Long-term memory in adulthood: An examination of the development of storage and retrieval processes at acquisition and retention , 1986 .

[18]  Geoffrey R. Loftus,et al.  Evaluating forgetting curves. , 1985 .

[19]  Vito Modigliani,et al.  The effect of expanded versus massed practice on the retention of multiplication facts and spelling lists. , 1985 .

[20]  W. Runquist,et al.  Some effects of remembering on forgetting , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[21]  Brian McElree,et al.  Normal forgetting of verbal lists as a function of their degree of learning. , 1983 .

[22]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Effect of semantic versus structural processing on long-term retention. , 1978 .

[23]  C. Thompson,et al.  How recall facilitates subsequent recall: A reappraisal. , 1978 .

[24]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Optimum rehearsal patterns and name learning , 1978 .

[25]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Differential effects of study and test trials on long-term recognition and recall , 1971 .

[26]  G. A. Allen,et al.  Effects of recall tests on long-term retention of paired associates , 1969 .

[27]  G. Box.  Some Theorems on Quadratic Forms Applied in the Study of Analysis of Variance Problems, II. Effects of Inequality of Variance and of Correlation Between Errors in the Two-Way Classification , 1954 .

[28]  H. F. Spitzer.  Studies in retention. , 1939 .