Especially actor network theory and the work of Bruno Latour seems to address design oriented researchers and for good reasons. Latours concept of Ding-politik and notion of the designer as a cautious Promethea have been welcomed by designers. (Latour 2005) (Ehn, 2008). Although convergences between fields and traditions are often considered a ‘good’ thing, I will, however stress that ‘inclusive strategies and attempts’ also comes with a price. In this case, as in many others, the price is translations that might lead to dissolutions of important differences and thereby a potential ‘flattening’ and ‘homogenization’ of concepts and ideas.
[1]
F. Guattari,et al.
A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia
,
1980
.
[2]
J. Law.
After Method: Mess in Social Science Research
,
2004
.
[3]
Christopher Gad,et al.
On the Consequences of Post-ANT
,
2010
.
[4]
A. Pickering.
The mangle of practice : time, agency, and science
,
1997
.
[5]
A. Mol.
The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice
,
2003
.
[6]
Bruno Latour,et al.
Whose Cosmos, Which Cosmopolitics? Comments on the Peace Terms of Ulrich Beck
,
2004
.