Extension of DQE to include scatter, grid, magnification, and focal spot blur: a new experimental technique and metric

In digital radiography, conventional DQE evaluations are performed under idealized conditions that do not reflect typical clinical operating conditions. For this reason, we have developed and evaluated an experimental methodology for measuring theeffective detective quantum efficiency (eDQE) of digital radiographic systems and its utility in chest imaging applications.To emulate the attenuation and scatter properties of the human thorax across a range of sizes, the study employed pediatric and adult geometric chest imaging phantoms designed for use in the FDA/CDRH Nationwide Evaluation of X-Ray Trends (NEXT) program and a third phantom configuration designed to represent the bariatric population. The MTF for each phantom configuration was measured using images of an opaque edge device placed at the nominal surface of each phantom and at a common reference point. For each phantom, the NNPS was measured in a uniform region within the phantom image acquired at an exposure level determined from a prior phototimed acquisition. Scatter measurements were made using a beam-stop technique. These quantities were used along with measures of phantom attenuation and estimates of x-ray flux, to compute the eDQE at the beam-entrance surface of the phantoms, reflecting the presence of scatter, grid, magnification, and focal spot blur. The MTF results showed notable degradation due to focal spot blurring enhanced by geometric magnification, with increasing phantom size. Measured scatter fractions were 33%, 34% and 46% for the pediatric, adult, and bariatric phantoms, respectively. Correspondingly, the measured narrow beam transmission fractions were 16%, 9%, and 3%. The eDQE results for the pediatric and adult phantoms correlate well at low spatial frequencies but show degradation in the eDQE at increasing spatial frequencies for the adult phantom in comparison to the pediatric phantom. The results for the bariatric configuration showed a marked decrease in eDQE in comparison to the adult phantom results, across all spatial frequencies, attributable to the combined differences in geometric magnification, and scatter. The eDQE metric has been demonstrated to be sensitive to body habitus suggesting its usefulness in assessing system response across a range of chest sizes and potentially making it a useful factor in protocol assessment and optimization.

[1]  E. Samei,et al.  Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography. , 2006, Medical physics.

[2]  Ying Chen,et al.  Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. I. Modulation transfer function. , 2006, Medical physics.

[3]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Assessment of detective quantum efficiency: intercomparison of a recently introduced international standard with prior methods. , 2007, Radiology.

[4]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Generalizing the MTF and DQE to include x-ray scatter and focal spot unsharpness: application to a new microangiographic system. , 2005, Medical physics.

[5]  E. Samei,et al.  A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device. , 1998, Medical physics.

[6]  C E Ravin,et al.  Quantitative scatter measurement in digital radiography using a photostimulable phosphor imaging system. , 1991, Medical physics.

[7]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Comparative scatter and dose performance of slot-scan and full-field digital chest radiography systems. , 2005, Radiology.

[8]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Detector or system? Extending the concept of detective quantum efficiency to characterize the performance of digital radiographic imaging systems. , 2008, Radiology.

[9]  E. Samei,et al.  Experimental comparison of noise and resolution for 2k and 4k storage phosphor radiography systems. , 1999, Medical physics.

[10]  Stephen Rudin,et al.  Generalized performance evaluation of x-ray image intensifier compared with a microangiographic system , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[11]  Xinming Liu,et al.  Optimization of MTF and DQE in magnification radiography: a theoretical analysis , 2000, Medical Imaging.

[12]  Ying Chen,et al.  Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. II. Noise power spectrum. , 2006, Medical physics.

[13]  正喜 朝原,et al.  Noise power spectrum , 2009 .

[14]  Stephen Rudin,et al.  Study of the generalized MTF and DQE for a new microangiographic system , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[15]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Use of effective detective quantum efficiency to optimise radiographic exposures for chest imaging with computed radiography , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[16]  G. Boreman.  Modulation Transfer Function , 1998 .

[17]  T. R. Fewell,et al.  Beam quality independent attenuation phantom for estimating patient exposure from x-ray automatic exposure controlled chest examinations. , 1984, Medical physics.

[18]  Robert M. Nishikawa,et al.  Standardization of NPS measurement: interim report of AAPM TG16 , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[19]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Effective DQE (eDQE) and speed of digital radiographic systems: an experimental methodology. , 2009, Medical physics.

[20]  Christoph Hoeschen,et al.  Measurement of the detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of digital X-ray detectors according to the novel standard IEC 62220-1. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[21]  Kyle J Myers,et al.  Efficiency of the human observer compared to an ideal observer based on a generalized NEQ which incorporates scatter and geometric unsharpness: evaluation with a 2AFC experiment , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[22]  E. Muntz,et al.  Analysis of the significance of scattered radiation in reduced dose mammography, including magnification effects, scatter suppression, and focal spot and detector blurring. , 1979, Medical physics.