Adaptation to Delayed Force Perturbations in Reaching Movements

Adaptation to deterministic force perturbations during reaching movements was extensively studied in the last few decades. Here, we use this methodology to explore the ability of the brain to adapt to a delayed velocity-dependent force field. Two groups of subjects preformed a standard reaching experiment under a velocity dependent force field. The force was either immediately proportional to the current velocity (Control) or lagged it by 50 ms (Test). The results demonstrate clear adaptation to the delayed force perturbations. Deviations from a straight line during catch trials were shifted in time compared to post-adaptation to a non-delayed velocity dependent field (Control), indicating expectation to the delayed force field. Adaptation to force fields is considered to be a process in which the motor system predicts the forces to be expected based on the state that a limb will assume in response to motor commands. This study demonstrates for the first time that the temporal window of this prediction needs not to be fixed. This is relevant to the ability of the adaptive mechanisms to compensate for variability in the transmission of information across the sensory-motor system.

[1]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[2]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  Ferdinando A. Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Perception of Delayed Stiffness , 2006, The First IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, 2006. BioRob 2006..

[4]  Gideon F. Inbar,et al.  Human motor control: learning to control a time-varying, nonlinear, many-to-one system , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[5]  P. Morasso Spatial control of arm movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  D Timmann,et al.  Adaptation to visuomotor rotation and force field perturbation is correlated to different brain areas in patients with cerebellar degeneration. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Driving in the future: temporal visuomotor adaptation and generalization. , 2001, Journal of vision.

[8]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Computational principles of movement neuroscience , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  E Bizzi,et al.  Motor learning through the combination of primitives. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[10]  David J. Ostry,et al.  Compensation for loads during arm movements using equilibrium-point control , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Neuronal activity in the supplementary motor area of monkeys adapting to a new dynamic environment. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  R. Miall,et al.  Digital Object Identifier (DOI) 10.1007/s002219900286 RESEARCH ARTICLE , 2022 .

[13]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Central representation of time during motor learning. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives , 2000, Nature.

[15]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Computational nature of human adaptive control during learning of reaching movements in force fields , 1999, Biological Cybernetics.

[17]  John W. Krakauer,et al.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  W. M. Smith,et al.  The effects of delayed and displaced visual feedback on motor control. , 1980, Journal of motor behavior.

[19]  Ferdinando A. Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Sequence, time, or state representation: how does the motor control system adapt to variable environments? , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.

[20]  G F Inbar,et al.  Parameter and signal adaptation in the stretch reflex loop. , 1976, Progress in brain research.

[21]  A. Karniel,et al.  Proximodistal gradient in the perception of delayed stiffness , 2009, 2009 Virtual Rehabilitation International Conference.

[22]  S. Kitazawa,et al.  Effects of delayed visual information on the rate and amount of prism adaptation in the human , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.