Comparative Analysis between Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications and Updated Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide Climate Database in the State of Tennessee

The Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide addresses climate effects on pavement design in a comprehensive way, which allows for investigating the effect of climate on pavement performance. However, it requires detailed climate inputs, which might not be readily available for most of the state departments of transportation. The AASHTOWare Pavement Mechanistic-Empirical Design (PMED) version 2.3 (v2.3) climate database encompasses 12 weather stations in the state of Tennessee, which does not satisfactorily represent all climatic regions in the state. The terrain in Tennessee varies from flat in the west to mountainous in the east. To evaluate the effectiveness of the updated AASHTOWare PMED v2.3 climate data input, this study analyses the performance of selected pavements in the state of Tennessee using the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) and the AASHTOWare PMED v2.3 databases as sources of PMED climate data inputs. A comparative analysis of the two climate data sources is conducted using eight long-term pavement performance (LTPP) sites in the state of Tennessee. The study revealed that MERRA as a climate data source for the state of Tennessee offers better geographic coverage, and therefore provides more precise distress predictions than the AASHTOWare PMED v2.3 climate database.

[1]  Yang H. Huang,et al.  Pavement Analysis and Design , 1997 .

[2]  B. Underwood,et al.  Impact of climate change on pavement structural performance in the United States , 2017 .

[3]  Alireza Bayat,et al.  Evaluation of the effects of Canadian climate conditions on the MEPDG predictions for flexible pavement performance , 2014 .

[4]  Final Document,et al.  Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design OF NEW AND REHABILITATED PAVEMENT STRUCTURES FINAL DOCUMENT APPENDIX QQ : STRUCTURAL RESPONSE MODELS FOR RIGID PAVEMENTS NCHRP , 2004 .

[5]  Tony Parry,et al.  Examining Effects of Climatic Factors on Flexible Pavement Performance and Service Life , 2013 .

[6]  David H Timm,et al.  Developing MEPDG Climate Data Input Files for Mississippi , 2011 .

[7]  Philip H. Ramsey.  Nonparametric Statistical Methods , 1974, Technometrics.

[8]  Harold L. Von Quintus,et al.  Updates to Hourly Climate Data for Use in AASHTOWare Pavement Mechanistic–Empirical Design , 2017 .

[9]  Lev Khazanovich,et al.  Comprehensive Evaluation of Effect of Climate in Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design GuidePredictions , 2010 .

[10]  Gonzalo R. Rada,et al.  Evaluation of Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTTP) Climatic Data for Use in Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) Calibration and Other Pavement Analysis , 2015 .

[11]  Kelvin C. P. Wang,et al.  Verification of Virtual Climatic Data in MEPDG Using the LTPP Database , 2010 .

[12]  William C. Meagher,et al.  Method for Evaluating Implications of Climate Change for Design and Performance of Flexible Pavements , 2012 .

[13]  Zhong Wu,et al.  Effects of Subgrade Resilient Modulus and Climate Inputs on MEPDG , 2012 .

[14]  Charles W. Schwartz,et al.  Alternative Source of Climate Data for Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Performance Prediction , 2015 .

[15]  R. Christopher Williams,et al.  Effects of Using Accurate Climatic Conditions for Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design , 2011 .

[16]  Jacob E. Hiller,et al.  Updating and augmenting weather data for pavement mechanistic-empirical design using ASOS/AWOS database in Michigan , 2018 .

[17]  Kelvin C. P. Wang,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Climatic Influence on MEPDG Flexible Pavement Performance Predictions , 2012 .