Risk-based methodology for scour analysis at bridge foundations

Abstract The collapse of bridges inevitably leads to economical losses and may also be responsible for human fatalities. A bridge may fail due to several reasons, with local scouring around its foundation being the most common. Despite decades of scouring research, there are still many uncertainties affecting the design process of bridge piers. The most critical and least explored are the hydrological and hydraulic variables. The recent intensification of floods may also increase the vulnerability of bridges to scour effects. Therefore, the present work aims to propose a risk-based methodology for considering scour at bridge foundations. It is composed of three main steps: (i) assessing extreme hydrological events (hazards); (ii) modeling river behavior through the computation of flow characteristics and bridge scour depths; and (iii) assessing bridge scour risk by associating its scour depth to foundation depth ratio with the priority factor (vulnerability) and assigning a qualitative evaluation of the scour risk rating (level of risk). The hydrological modeling incorporates uncertainty with an averaging approach in the design floods definition. The flow characteristics are simulated with the HEC-RAS model, which also contains a scour module for bridge scour assessment. However, other empirical estimates are considered for simple and pile-supported foundations. This study ends with a qualitative assessment of how the scouring phenomenon affects bridge vulnerability and its safety. The proposed risk-based methodology - validated through a case study, the new Hintze Ribeiro bridge in Portugal - can be potentially incorporated into regular bridge inspection schedules as a useful tool for risk management measures, assisting in catastrophic events’ prevention.

[1]  Jelena M. Andrić,et al.  Risk Assessment of Bridges under Multiple Hazards in Operation Period , 2016 .

[2]  Selecting the best probability distribution for at-site flood frequency analysis; a study of Torne River , 2019 .

[3]  P. Moran The statistical treatment of flood flows , 1957 .

[4]  Emmett M. Laursen,et al.  An Analysis of Relief Bridge Scour , 1963 .

[5]  Marvin W. Halling,et al.  Bridge Failure Rate , 2015 .

[6]  Giuliano Di Baldassarre,et al.  BRIDGE PIER SCOUR: A REVIEW OF PROCESSES, MEASUREMENTS AND ESTIMATES , 2012 .

[7]  G. di Baldassarre,et al.  Model averaging versus model selection: estimating design floods with uncertain river flow data , 2018, Hydrological Sciences Journal.

[8]  Michael Todinov,et al.  Risk-Based Reliability Analysis and Generic Principles for Risk Reduction , 2006 .

[9]  K. Abdullah,et al.  Numerical modeling techniques for flood analysis , 2016 .

[10]  F. Ashraf,et al.  Analysis of Peak Flow Distribution for Bridge Collapse Sites , 2019, Water.

[11]  Adrian E. Raftery,et al.  Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial (with comments by M. Clyde, David Draper and E. I. George, and a rejoinder by the authors , 1999 .

[12]  D. Proske Bridge Collapse Frequencies versus Failure Probabilities , 2018 .

[13]  P. Bates,et al.  Evaluation of 1D and 2D numerical models for predicting river flood inundation , 2002 .

[14]  Marcelo H. García,et al.  Local Scour and Sediment Deposition at Bridge Piers during Floods , 2020 .

[15]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  A Risk-Informed Ship Collision Alert System: Framework and Application , 2015 .

[16]  Lorenzo Macorini,et al.  A framework for probabilistic assessment of clear-water scour around bridge piers , 2017 .

[17]  F. C. Hadipriono,et al.  ANALYSIS OF RECENT BRIDGE FAILURES IN THE UNITED STATES , 2003 .

[18]  Paolo Gardoni,et al.  Statistical, risk, and reliability analyses of bridge scour , 2014 .

[19]  Emmett M. Laursen,et al.  Scour at Bridge Crossings , 1960 .

[20]  Alexandros Kallias,et al.  Probabilistic assessment of local scour in bridge piers under changing environmental conditions , 2016 .

[21]  Sarah L. Billington,et al.  Historical Analysis of Hydraulic Bridge Collapses in the Continental United States , 2017 .

[22]  Giuliano Di Baldassarre,et al.  Uncertainty in design flood profiles derived by hydraulic modelling , 2012 .

[23]  Keith Beven,et al.  How to make advances in hydrological modelling , 2019, Hydrology Research.

[24]  A M Shirole,et al.  PLANNING FOR A COMPREHENSIVE BRIDGE SAFETY ASSURANCE PROGRAM , 1991 .

[25]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[26]  A. Shamseldin,et al.  Local Scour at Complex Bridge Piers in Close Proximity under Clear-Water and Live-Bed Flow Regime , 2019, Water.

[27]  V. Klemeš,et al.  Tall Tales about Tails of Hydrological Distributions. I , 2000 .

[28]  E. Tubaldi,et al.  Quantification of Modelling Uncertainties in Bridge Scour Risk Assessment under Multiple Flood Events , 2019, Geosciences.

[29]  Wolfgang Nowak,et al.  The hydrologist’s guide to Bayesian model selection, averaging and combination , 2019, Journal of Hydrology.

[30]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Flood-plain mapping: a critical discussion of deterministic and probabilistic approaches , 2010 .

[31]  Rob Lamb,et al.  Vulnerability of bridges to scour: insights from an international expert elicitation workshop , 2016 .

[32]  S. Manfreda,et al.  A Theoretically Derived Probability Distribution of Scour , 2018, Water.

[33]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  Acceptable risk bases for design of structures , 2001 .

[34]  Tommaso Moramarco,et al.  A reappraisal of bridge piers scour vulnerability: a case study in the Upper Tiber River basin (central Italy) , 2017 .

[35]  Bruce W. Melville,et al.  Evaluation of Existing Equations for Local Scour at Bridge Piers , 2014 .

[36]  Hilary K. McMillan,et al.  Hydrological data uncertainty and its implications , 2018, WIREs Water.

[37]  Joaquim J. Sousa,et al.  Multi-temporal SAR interferometry reveals acceleration of bridge sinking before collapse , 2013 .

[38]  Yacov Y Haimes,et al.  Risk Filtering, Ranking, and Management Framework Using Hierarchical Holographic Modeling , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[39]  George Constantinescu,et al.  Flow-Field Complexity and Design Estimation of Pier-Scour Depth: Sixty Years since Laursen and Toch , 2017 .

[40]  S. Manfreda,et al.  The Science behind Scour at Bridge Foundations: A Review , 2020, Water.

[41]  Bithin Datta,et al.  OPTIMAL ESTIMATION OF ROUGHNESS IN OPEN-CHANNEL FLOWS. TECHNICAL NOTE , 2000 .

[42]  G. Kite Frequency and risk analyses in hydrology , 1977 .

[43]  Maurizio Mazzoleni,et al.  A systematic comparison of statistical and hydrological methods for design flood estimation , 2019, Hydrology Research.