Recent improvements in the system code package AC2 2019 for the safety analysis of nuclear reactors

Abstract The system code package AC2 by GRS for safety analyses of nuclear reactors from normal operation to severe accidents has been updated with a new release. We briefly describe the main modules of AC2 2019: ATHLET 3.2, ATHLET-CD 3.2 and COCOSYS 3.0 and selected improvements in these codes. We illustrate the improved capabilities of AC2 with selected examples. The post-test-calculation of the flooding pool of the INKA test facility demonstrated the improved ATHLET 3D model with explicit mixture level model. For ATHLET-CD, we apply the AIDA module with improvements in wall ablation and heat transfer models to a generic AP1000 lower plenum filled with molten corium. And we apply the new SAFT fission product transport module simulating three release paths through steam generator U-tubes. For COCOSYS, we present uncertainty analysis results for two MCCI experiments which justify using an elevated concrete decomposition temperature of 1800 K. Finally, we illustrate the potential of coupling ATHLET to CFD codes for safety analysis with results of a post-test calculation of the ROCOM PKLIIIT1.1 test on 3D mixing phenomena in an RPV.

[1]  Frank-Peter Weiss,et al.  Coolant mixing in a PWR - de-boration transients, steam line breaks and emergency core cooling injection - experiments and analyses , 2002 .

[2]  H. Alsmeyer,et al.  BETA experiments on melt-concrete interaction: the role of zirconium and the potential sump water contact during core melt-down accidents , 1995 .

[3]  John Ferguson Smart,et al.  Jenkins: The Definitive Guide , 2011 .

[4]  Marti Jeltsov,et al.  Comparison of different coupling CFD-STH approaches for pre-test analysis of a TALL-3D experiment , 2015 .

[5]  Andreas Schaffrath,et al.  Exemplification of AC2’s multidimensional capabilities to the application of large pools within the frame of the German EASY project , 2019 .

[6]  F. Menter Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[7]  T. G. Theofanous,et al.  In-vessel coolability and retention of a core melt. Volume 1 , 1996 .

[8]  Manfred Fischer,et al.  Towards an European consensus on possible causes of MCCI ablation anisotropy in an oxidic pool. , 2014 .

[9]  B. Rameau,et al.  CATHARE 2 V2.5_2: A single version for various applications , 2011 .

[10]  Soeren Kliem,et al.  Experiments at the mixing test facility ROCOM for benchmarking of CFD codes , 2008 .

[11]  Soeren Kliem,et al.  Validation and verification of the coupled neutron kinetic/thermal hydraulic system code DYN3D/ATHLET , 2015 .

[12]  P. Chatelard,et al.  Main modelling features of the ASTEC V2.1 major version , 2016 .

[13]  Mitchell T. Farmer,et al.  CORIUM COOLABILITY UNDER EX-VESSEL ACCIDENT CONDITIONS FOR LWRs , 2009 .

[14]  Hong-Sik Lim,et al.  Korean Development of Advanced Thermal-Hydraulic Codes for Water Reactors and HTGRs: Space and Gamma , 2013 .

[15]  A. Schaffrath THE NUCLEAR SIMULATION CHAIN OF GRS , 2017 .

[16]  Frank-Peter Weiss,et al.  Coolant Mixing in a Pressurized Water Reactor: Deboration Transients, Steam-Line Breaks, and Emergency Core Cooling Injection , 2003 .

[17]  D. Bestion,et al.  System thermalhydraulics for design basis accident analysis and simulation: Status of tools and methods and direction for future R&D , 2017 .

[18]  Joachim Herb A Continuous Integration Platform for the Deterministic Safety Analyses Code System AC2 , 2018 .