Randomized Manipulation of Early Cognitive Experience Impacts Adult Brain Structure

Abstract Does early exposure to cognitive and linguistic stimulation impact brain structure? Or do genetic predispositions account for the co-occurrence of certain neuroanatomical phenotypes and a tendency to engage children in cognitively stimulating activities? Low socioeconomic status infants were randomized to either 5 years of cognitively and linguistically stimulating center-based care or a comparison condition. The intervention resulted in large and statistically significant changes in brain structure measured in midlife, particularly for male individuals. These findings are the first to extend the large literature on cognitive enrichment effects on animal brains to humans, and to demonstrate the effects of uniquely human features such as linguistic stimulation.

[1]  M. Farah.  Socioeconomic status and the brain: prospects for neuroscience-informed policy , 2018, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[2]  J. Sparling,et al.  Learningames for Threes and Fours: A Guide to Adult/Child Play , 1983 .

[3]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[4]  S. Loeb,et al.  The Intersection of Health and Education to Address School Readiness of All Children , 2018, Pediatrics.

[5]  Arno Klein,et al.  Large-scale evaluation of ANTs and FreeSurfer cortical thickness measurements , 2014, NeuroImage.

[6]  Jamie L. Hanson,et al.  Behavioral Problems After Early Life Stress: Contributions of the Hippocampus and Amygdala , 2015, Biological Psychiatry.

[7]  P. Dayan,et al.  Early childhood investment impacts social decision-making four decades later , 2018, Nature Communications.

[8]  Heloísa Maria Ottoni,et al.  Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências e o ponto T de Goffman: estudo exploratório │ Goffman's Point T in the Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Science: an exploratory study , 2013 .

[9]  J. Giedd,et al.  Annual Research Review: Developmental considerations of gene by environment interactions. , 2011, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[10]  N. Fox,et al.  Variation in neural development as a result of exposure to institutionalization early in childhood , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[12]  Holly S. Schindler,et al.  Do the Effects of Early Childhood Education Programs Differ by Gender? A Meta-Analysis. , 2016, Early childhood research quarterly.

[13]  G. Duncan,et al.  Boosting Family Income to Promote Child Development , 2015, The Future of children.

[14]  F A Campbell,et al.  The development of cognitive and academic abilities: growth curves from an early childhood educational experiment. , 2001, Developmental psychology.

[15]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  A. Friederici.  The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function. , 2011, Physiological reviews.

[17]  M. Burchinal,et al.  Sustaining Gains from Early Childhood Intervention: The Abecedarian Program , 2019, Sustaining Early Childhood Learning Gains.

[18]  Jill M. Goldstein,et al.  Early Life Programming and Neurodevelopmental Disorders , 2010, Biological Psychiatry.

[19]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: Evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[20]  A. Wax.  The Poverty of the Neuroscience of Poverty : Policy Payoff or False Promise ? , 2017 .

[21]  Kimberly G. Noble,et al.  The neuroscience of socioeconomic inequality , 2020, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

[22]  J. Heckman,et al.  Gender Differences in the Benefits of an Influential Early Childhood Program , 2017, European economic review.

[23]  Nuria K. Mackes,et al.  Early childhood deprivation is associated with alterations in adult brain structure despite subsequent environmental enrichment , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  H. Fitzgerald,et al.  PSYCHOLOGY OF BOYS AT RISK: INDICATORS FROM 0-5. , 2017, Infant mental health journal.

[25]  T. Robbins,et al.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  H. Dunham.  Social structures and mental disorders: competing hypotheses of explanation. , 1961, The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly.

[27]  Raj Chetty,et al.  The Effects of Exposure to Better Neighborhoods on Children: New Evidence from the Moving to Opportunity Experiment , 2015, The American economic review.

[28]  M. Diamond.  Response of the brain to enrichment. , 2001, Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias.

[29]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest , 2006, NeuroImage.

[30]  M. Rosenzweig.  Environmental complexity, cerebral change, and behavior. , 1966, The American psychologist.

[31]  R. Bradley,et al.  Socioeconomic status and child development. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[32]  J. Heckman,et al.  Early Childhood Investments Substantially Boost Adult Health , 2014, Science.

[33]  C. Ramey,et al.  Persistent Effects of Early Childhood Education on High-Risk Children and Their Mothers , 2000 .

[34]  E. Hoff.  Interpreting the early language trajectories of children from low-SES and language minority homes: implications for closing achievement gaps. , 2013, Developmental psychology.

[35]  Paul A. Yushkevich,et al.  Multi-Atlas Segmentation with Joint Label Fusion , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.