Interactive (1+1) evolutionary strategy with one-fifth success rule

Incorporation of fitness evaluation by a human user into evolutionary computation is called interactive evolutionary computation (IEC). Various IEC methods have been studied for design problems. An important challenge in IEC is to decrease human user's workload for fitness evaluation. For example, it is almost impossible for human users to continue to examine and evaluate tens of thousands of solutions. In some application fields such as evolutionary music, it is impossible to evaluate multiple solutions simultaneously. In our previous study, we formulated an IEC model by assuming the minimum level of the human user's ability to evaluate the fitness of each solution. We also illustrated our IEC model through computational experiments on combinatorial optimization problems. In this study, we address the use of our IEC model for continuous optimization problems. We propose an idea to incorporate step-size adaptation by the well-known one-fifth success rule into our IEC model. Through computational experiments on four test problems, we examine the search ability of our IEC model with the step-size adaptation mechanism.

[1]  T. Unemi SBART 2 . 4 : an IEC Tool for Creating 2 D Images , Movies , and Collage , 2000 .

[2]  Hitoshi Iba,et al.  Creating singing vocal expressions by means of interactive evolutionary computation , 2009, Int. J. Knowl. Eng. Soft Data Paradigms.

[3]  Nao and Iba Hitoshi Tokui,et al.  Music Composition with Interactive Evolutionary Computation , 2000 .

[4]  Makoto Inoue,et al.  User's favorite scent design using paired comparison-based Interactive Differential Evolution , 2010, IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation.

[5]  Fumio Kojima,et al.  Multiple fuzzy state-value functions for human evaluation through interactive trajectory planning of a partner robot , 2006, Soft Comput..

[6]  Miho Ohsaki,et al.  Interactive Evolutionary Computation-Based Hearing Aid Fitting , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[7]  Hideyuki Takagi,et al.  Interactive evolutionary computation: fusion of the capabilities of EC optimization and human evaluation , 2001, Proc. IEEE.

[8]  Petros Koumoutsakos,et al.  Learning probability distributions in continuous evolutionary algorithms – a comparative review , 2004, Natural Computing.

[9]  Anne Auger,et al.  Benchmarking the (1+1) evolution strategy with one-fifth success rule on the BBOB-2009 function testbed , 2009, GECCO '09.

[10]  Ashutosh Tiwari,et al.  Ergonomic Chair Design by Fusing Qualitative and Quantitative Criteria Using Interactive Genetic Algorithms , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[11]  K. Steiglitz,et al.  Adaptive step size random search , 1968 .

[12]  Francesc J. Ferri,et al.  Distance-based relevance feedback using a hybrid interactive genetic algorithm for image retrieval , 2011, Appl. Soft Comput..

[13]  Sung-Bae Cho,et al.  Application of interactive genetic algorithm to fashion design , 2000 .

[14]  Sung-Bae Cho,et al.  Towards Creative Evolutionary Systems with Interactive Genetic Algorithm , 2002, Applied Intelligence.

[15]  Chih-Chin Lai,et al.  A User-Oriented Image Retrieval System Based on Interactive Genetic Algorithm , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[16]  Sung-Bae Cho,et al.  Emotional image and musical information retrieval with interactive genetic algorithm , 2004, Proc. IEEE.

[17]  Tatsuo Unemi,et al.  SBART 2.4: An IEC Tool for Creating Two-Dimensional Images, Movies and Collages , 2002, Leonardo.

[18]  Denis Pallez,et al.  Paired Comparisons-based Interactive Differential Evolution , 2009, ArXiv.