Values, Efficacy and Trust as Determinants of Innovative Organizational Behaviour in Russia

This study examines the relationship between values, efficacy, trust and innovative organizational behaviour in Russia. We analyse the direct and indirect effect of gender, age and education on innovative behaviour via values, trust and efficacy. For the measurement of values we employed a new revised value instrument with 19 values. We found that Openness to Change values had a significant positive effect and Conservation values a significant negative effect on innovative behaviour in organizations; efficacy and trust had a significant positive effect. Moreover, the effect of values is moderated by the level of efficacy. Gender, age and education directly influence innovative behaviour and determine such behaviour via values, efficacy and trust.

[1]  S. Schwartz,et al.  A Hierarchical Structure of Basic Human Values in a Third-Order Confirmatory Factor Analysis , 2014 .

[2]  Eldad Davidov,et al.  Refining the theory of basic individual values. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Testing the discriminant validity of Schwartz’ Portrait Value Questionnaire items – A replication and extension of Knoppen and Saris (2009) , 2012 .

[4]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Values and Attitudes Towards Innovation Among Canadian, Chinese and Russian Students , 2012 .

[5]  J. Pearl.  The Causal Foundations of Structural Equation Modeling , 2012 .

[6]  John R. Hipp,et al.  Nonrecursive Models: Endogeneity, Reciprocal Relationships, and Feedback Loops , 2011 .

[7]  B. Nijstad,et al.  Creativity in individuals and groups: Basic principles with practical implications , 2011 .

[8]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach , 2009 .

[9]  D. Knoppen,et al.  Do we have to combine Values in the Schwartz' Human Values Scale? A Comment on the Davidov Studies , 2009 .

[10]  Phil Wood.  Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research , 2008 .

[11]  S. Dollinger,et al.  Creativity and Values , 2007 .

[12]  Shalom H. Schwartz.  Les valeurs de base de la personne : théorie, mesures et applications , 2006 .

[13]  Mohan Subramaniam,et al.  The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities , 2005 .

[14]  Detelin S. Elenkov,et al.  Top Management Leadership and Influence on Innovation: The Role of Sociocultural Context , 2005 .

[15]  G. Robert,et al.  Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. , 2004, The Milbank quarterly.

[16]  P. Tierney,et al.  The Pygmalion Process and Employee Creativity , 2004 .

[17]  E. Naveh,et al.  Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other? , 2004 .

[18]  Steven M. Farmer,et al.  Creative Self-Efficacy: Its Potential Antecedents and Relationship to Creative Performance , 2002 .

[19]  G. Hofstede.  Culture′s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations , 2001 .

[20]  R. Vandenberg,et al.  A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research , 2000 .

[21]  C. Slappendel.  Perspectives on Innovation in Organizations , 1996 .

[22]  S. Shane,et al.  Cultural Differences in Innovation Championing Strategies , 1995 .

[23]  R. Hurley.  Group culture and its effect on innovative productivity , 1995 .

[24]  S. Mezias,et al.  The three faces of corporate renewal: institution, revolution, and evolution , 1993 .

[25]  F. Damanpour.  Organizational Size and Innovation , 1992 .

[26]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF TRAINING METHOD ON SELF‐EFFICACY AND IDEA GENERATION AMONG MANAGERS , 1989 .

[27]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[28]  Fariborz Damanpour,et al.  The Adoption of Technological, Administrative, and Ancillary Innovations: Impact of Organizational Factors , 1987 .

[29]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[30]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Effect of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance. , 1984 .

[31]  A. Hirschman,et al.  "Exit, Voice, and Loyalty:" further reflections and a survey of recent contributions. , 1980, The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly. Health and society.

[32]  A. Hirschman,et al.  Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States , 1972 .

[33]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Determinants of Innovation in Organizations , 1969, American Political Science Review.

[34]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[35]  Andreas Ritter,et al.  Structural Equations With Latent Variables , 2016 .

[36]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Conditional process modeling: Using structural equation modeling to examine contingent causal processes. , 2013 .

[37]  Ramesh K. Agarwal,et al.  A MODEL OF CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2011 .

[38]  Mark Snyder,et al.  "The less I trust, the less I contribute (or not)?": The effects of trust, accountability and self-monitoring in social dilemmas , 2001 .

[39]  H. K. Tang,et al.  An integrative model of innovation in organizations , 1998 .

[40]  R. Fildes.  Conditioning Diagnostics: Collinearity and Weak Data in Regression , 1993 .

[41]  S. Schwartz.  Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries , 1992 .

[42]  Scott Shane,et al.  Why do some societies invent more than others , 1992 .

[43]  J. Teasdale.  Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change? , 1978 .

[44]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1977 .

[45]  M. Sherif,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1946, Psychological review.

[46]  R. Sternberg.  Enhancing Creativity , 2022, Creativity.