A network modelling approach to assess non-pharmaceutical disease controls in a worker population: An application to SARS-CoV-2

As part of a concerted pandemic response to protect public health, businesses can enact non-pharmaceutical controls to minimise exposure to pathogens in workplaces and premises open to the public. Amendments to working practices can lead to the amount, duration and/or proximity of interactions being changed, ultimately altering the dynamics of disease spread. These modifications could be specific to the type of business being operated. We use a data-driven approach to parameterise an individual-based network model for transmission of SARS-CoV-2 amongst the working population, stratified into work sectors. The network is comprised of layered contacts to consider the risk of spread in multiple encounter settings (workplaces, households, social and other). We analyse several interventions targeted towards working practices: mandating a fraction of the population to work from home; using temporally asynchronous work patterns; and introducing measures to create ‘COVID-secure’ workplaces. We also assess the general role of adherence to (or effectiveness of) isolation and test and trace measures and demonstrate the impact of all these interventions across a variety of relevant metrics. The progress of the epidemic can be significantly hindered by instructing a significant proportion of the workforce to work from home. Furthermore, if required to be present at the workplace, asynchronous work patterns can help to reduce infections when compared with scenarios where all workers work on the same days, particularly for longer working weeks. When assessing COVID-secure workplace measures, we found that smaller work teams and a greater reduction in transmission risk reduced the probability of large, prolonged outbreaks. Finally, following isolation guidance and engaging with contact tracing without other measures is an effective tool to curb transmission, but is highly sensitive to adherence levels. In the absence of sufficient adherence to non-pharmaceutical interventions, our results indicate a high likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 spreading widely throughout a worker population. Given the heterogeneity of demographic attributes across worker roles, in addition to the individual nature of controls such as contact tracing, we demonstrate the utility of a network model approach to investigate workplace-targeted intervention strategies and the role of test, trace and isolation in tackling disease spread.

[1]  Georgia Salanti,et al.  Occurrence and transmission potential of asymptomatic and presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections: A living systematic review and meta-analysis , 2020, medRxiv.

[2]  Yiu Chung Lau,et al.  Temporal dynamics in viral shedding and transmissibility of COVID-19 , 2020, Nature Medicine.

[3]  P. Diggle,et al.  High and increasing prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 swab positivity in England during end September beginning October 2020: REACT-1 round 5 updated report , 2020, medRxiv.

[4]  M. Keeling,et al.  Efficacy of contact tracing for the containment of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) , 2020, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[5]  J. Uhm,et al.  Patterns of viral clearance in the natural course of asymptomatic COVID-19: Comparison with symptomatic non-severe COVID-19 , 2020, International Journal of Infectious Diseases.

[6]  P. Diggle,et al.  Resurgence of SARS-CoV-2 in England: detection by community antigen surveillance , 2020, medRxiv.

[7]  Sebastian Bonhoeffer,et al.  COVID-19 infectivity profile correction. , 2020, Swiss medical weekly.

[8]  Matt J. Keeling,et al.  Social encounter networks: characterizing Great Britain , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  Assessment of workers’ personal vulnerability to covid-19 using ‘covid-age’ , 2020, Occupational medicine.

[10]  Lucie Abeler-Dörner,et al.  Quantifying SARS-CoV-2 transmission suggests epidemic control with digital contact tracing , 2020, Science.

[11]  A. Charlett,et al.  Transmission dynamics of COVID-19 in household and community settings in the United Kingdom, January to March 2020 , 2020, medRxiv.

[12]  Hannah R. Meredith,et al.  The Incubation Period of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) From Publicly Reported Confirmed Cases: Estimation and Application , 2020, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  M. Keeling,et al.  Networks and epidemic models , 2005, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[14]  R. Viner,et al.  Determining the optimal strategy for reopening schools, the impact of test and trace interventions, and the risk of occurrence of a second COVID-19 epidemic wave in the UK: a modelling study , 2020, The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health.

[15]  D. Ho,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 viral dynamics in acute infections , 2020 .

[16]  Predictions of COVID-19 dynamics in the UK: Short-term forecasting and analysis of potential exit strategies. , 2021, PLoS computational biology.

[17]  N. G. Davies,et al.  Effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 cases, deaths, and demand for hospital services in the UK: a modelling study , 2020, The Lancet Public Health.

[18]  M. Hotopf,et al.  Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal probability sample survey of the UK population , 2020, The Lancet Psychiatry.

[19]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Estimating the effectiveness of routine asymptomatic PCR testing at different frequencies for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections , 2020, BMC Medicine.

[20]  E. Vynnycky,et al.  The impact of testing and infection prevention and control strategies on within-hospital transmission dynamics of COVID-19 in English hospitals , 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

[21]  Benjamin D. Atkins,et al.  The impact of school reopening on the spread of COVID-19 in England , 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

[22]  Matt J. Keeling,et al.  Social encounter networks: collective properties and disease transmission , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[23]  L. Danon,et al.  COVID-19 transmission in a university setting: a rapid review of modelling studies , 2020, medRxiv.

[24]  Benjamin D. Atkins,et al.  Modelling SARS-CoV-2 transmission in a UK university setting , 2020, medRxiv.

[25]  S. Eubank,et al.  Commentary on Ferguson, et al., “Impact of Non-pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) to Reduce COVID-19 Mortality and Healthcare Demand” , 2020, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology.

[26]  T. House,et al.  Rapid increase of Care Homes reporting outbreaks a sign of eventual substantial disease burden , 2020, medRxiv.

[27]  T. Hollingsworth,et al.  COVID-19 spread in the UK: the end of the beginning? , 2020, The Lancet.

[28]  S. More,et al.  TITLE PAGE Title: The relative infectiousness of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infected persons compared with symptomatic individuals: A rapid scoping review. Authors , 2020 .

[29]  Amy C. Thomas,et al.  High COVID-19 transmission potential associated with re-opening universities can be mitigated with layered interventions , 2020, Nature Communications.

[30]  L. Danon,et al.  Using social contact data to predict and compare the impact of social distancing policies with implications for school re-opening , 2020, medRxiv.