An analytic network process-based approach to concept evaluation in a new product development environment

Selecting the best product concept is one of the most critical tasks in a new product development (NPD) environment. Making decisions at this stage becomes very difficult due to imprecise and uncertain product requirements. So, the evaluation process of determining the most satisfying conceptual design has been a very vital issue for companies to survive in fast-growing markets for a long time. Therefore, most companies have used various methods to successfully carry out this difficult and time-consuming process. Of these methods, an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) has been widely used in multiple-criteria decision-making problems (i.e. concept selection, equipment evaluation). In this study, however, we use an analytic network process (ANP), a more general form of AHP, due to the fact that AHP cannot accommodate the variety of interactions, dependencies and feedback between higher and lower level elements. Briefly, in this paper, an ANP-based approach is presented to evaluate a set of conceptual design alternatives in order to reach to the best concept satisfying the needs and expectations of both customers and company. In addition, a numerical example is presented to illustrate the proposed approach.

[1]  Madan G. Singh,et al.  Fuzzy analytic network process and its application to the development of decision support systems , 2003, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[2]  Adrien Presley,et al.  R&D project selection using the analytic network process , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[3]  John R. Dixon,et al.  A review of research in mechanical engineering design. Part II: Representations, analysis, and design for the life cycle , 1989 .

[4]  Michael J. Scott,et al.  Quantifying Certainty in Design Decisions: Examining AHP , 2002 .

[5]  Panagiotis Kouvelis,et al.  Design strategy and its interface with manufacturing and marketing: A conceptual framework , 1991 .

[6]  Alex H. B. Duffy,et al.  Design co-ordination for concurrent engineering , 1993 .

[7]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[8]  John R. Dixon,et al.  A review of research in mechanical engineering design. Part I: Descriptive, prescriptive, and computer-based models of design processes , 1989 .

[9]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[10]  Zeki Ayağ,et al.  A fuzzy AHP-based simulation approach to concept evaluation in a NPD environment , 2005 .

[11]  Mustafa Yurdakul,et al.  Measuring long-term performance of a manufacturing firm using the Analytic Network Process (ANP) approach , 2003 .

[12]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[13]  Fatemeh Zahedi,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process—A Survey of the Method and its Applications , 1986 .

[14]  Zeki Ayağ,et al.  An integrated approach to evaluating conceptual design alternatives in a new product development environment , 2005 .

[15]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision Making, Scaling, and Number Crunching , 1989 .

[16]  Zeki Ayağ,et al.  An analytic-hierarchy-process based simulation model for implementation and analysis of computer-aided systems , 2002 .

[17]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process : the organization and prioritization of complexity , 1996 .

[18]  A. M. King,et al.  Development of a Methodology for Concept Selection in Flexible Design Strategies , 1999 .

[19]  R. Hämäläinen,et al.  The analytic network process in energy policy planning , 1986 .

[20]  Soung Hie Kim,et al.  Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection , 2000, Comput. Oper. Res..

[21]  T. L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback , 2001 .

[22]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Analyzing organizational project alternatives for agile manufacturing processes: An analytical network approach , 1999 .

[23]  J. Hauser,et al.  Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of the literature , 1996 .

[24]  D. Teece,et al.  Organizing for innovation: When is virtual virtuous? , 2002 .

[25]  Lawrence C. Leung,et al.  A Multi-Attribute Product Life-Cycle Approach to Replacement Decisions: An Application of Saaty's System-With-Feedback Method , 1993 .

[26]  Deborah L Thurston,et al.  Fuzzy Ratings and Utility Analysis in Preliminary Design Evaluation of Multiple Attributes , 1992 .

[27]  R. Shankar,et al.  On‐line trust building in e‐enabled supply chain , 2003 .

[28]  Deborah L Thurston,et al.  Fuzzing ratings for multiattribute design decision-making , 1994 .

[29]  Da Ruan,et al.  Determining the importance weights for the design requirements in the house of quality using the fuzzy analytic network approach , 2004 .