Additive Effects of Repetition and Predictability during Comprehension: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials

Previous research has shown that neural responses to words during sentence comprehension are sensitive to both lexical repetition and a word’s predictability in context. While previous research has often contrasted the effects of these variables (e.g. by looking at cases in which word repetition violates sentence-level constraints), little is known about how they work in tandem. In the current study we examine how recent exposure to a word and its predictability in context combine to impact lexical semantic processing. We devise a novel paradigm that combines reading comprehension with a recognition memory task, allowing for an orthogonal manipulation of a word’s predictability and its repetition status. Using event-related brain potentials (ERPs), we show that word repetition and predictability have qualitatively similar and additive effects on the N400 amplitude. We propose that prior exposure to a word and predictability impact lexical semantic processing in an additive and independent fashion.

[1]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Dissociation of Semantic Priming, Word and Non-Word Repetition Effects by Event-Related Potentials , 1987 .

[2]  Marte Otten,et al.  Discourse-Based Word Anticipation During Language Processing: Prediction or Priming? , 2008 .

[3]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  An electrophysiological investigation of the effects of coreference on word repetition and synonymy , 2005, Brain and Language.

[4]  R. E. Schuberth,et al.  Effects of stimulus and contextual information on the lexical decision process , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[5]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[6]  A M Liberman,et al.  Duplex perception of cues for stop consonants: Evidence for a phonetic mode , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  M. Rugg,et al.  Lexical contribution to nonword-repetition effects: Evidence from event-related potentials , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[8]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing , 2007, Brain Research.

[9]  Axel Mecklinger,et al.  Bridging the gap between the semantic N400 and the early old/new memory effect , 2007, Neuroreport.

[10]  M. Kutas,et al.  An Electrophysiological Probe of Incidental Semantic Association , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Right hemisphere sensitivity to word- and sentence-level context: evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2005, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition.

[12]  Renato De Mori,et al.  A Cache-Based Natural Language Model for Speech Recognition , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[13]  R. Johnson,et al.  On the neural generators of the P300 component of the event-related potential. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[14]  J. H. Neely Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. , 1977 .

[15]  Wilson L. Taylor,et al.  “Cloze Procedure”: A New Tool for Measuring Readability , 1953 .

[16]  P. Gordon,et al.  Reading words in discourse: the modulation of lexical priming effects by message-level context. , 2006, Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews.

[17]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Chapter 1 Time for Meaning: Electrophysiology Provides Insights into the Dynamics of Representation and Processing in Semantic Memory , 2009 .

[18]  K. Stanovich,et al.  On priming by a sentence context. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  John R. Anderson Language, Memory, and Thought , 1976 .

[20]  Edward Gibson,et al.  The Interaction of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Statistics in the Resolution of Syntactic Category Ambiguity. , 2006 .

[21]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Cross-modal semantic priming: A time-course analysis using event-related brain potentials , 1993 .

[22]  C. Petten A comparison of lexical and sentence-level context effects in event-related potentials , 1993 .

[23]  Katherine A. DeLong,et al.  Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  C. Petten,et al.  Neural localization of semantic context effects in electromagnetic and hemodynamic studies , 2006, Brain and Language.

[25]  M. Bar Predictions in the brain : using our past to generate a future , 2011 .

[26]  S. Waxman,et al.  With referential cues, infants successfully use phonetic detail in word learning , 2007 .

[27]  M. Hautus Corrections for extreme proportions and their biasing effects on estimated values ofd′ , 1995 .

[28]  Sandra R Waxman,et al.  What paradox? Referential cues allow for infant use of phonetic detail in word learning. , 2010, Child development.

[29]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  So that's what you meant! Event-related potentials reveal multiple aspects of context use during construction of message-level meaning , 2012, NeuroImage.

[30]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[31]  Annette M. B. de Groot,et al.  Word-context effects in word naming and lexical decision , 1985 .

[32]  B. Dorval,et al.  Conversational Organization and Its Development , 1990 .

[33]  E. Donchin,et al.  On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. , 1977, Psychophysiology.

[34]  Marta Kutas,et al.  CHAPTER 15 A Look around at What Lies Ahead: Prediction and Predictability in Language Processing , 2010 .

[35]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[36]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  A. Liberman,et al.  An Effect of Learning on Speech Perception: The Discrimination of Durations of Silence with and without Phonemic Significance , 1961 .

[38]  M. Rugg,et al.  The effects of task on the modulation of event-related potentials by word repetition. , 1988, Psychophysiology.

[39]  Marc Brys,et al.  Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English , 2009 .

[40]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400 , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[41]  M. Ross Quillian,et al.  Retrieval time from semantic memory , 1969 .

[42]  Shelia M. Kennison,et al.  Comprehending referential expressions during reading: Evidence from eye tracking , 1997 .

[43]  Kim Kirsner,et al.  The bilingual lexicon: Language-specific units in an integrated network , 1984 .

[44]  Michael J. Constantino,et al.  Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations , 2008 .

[45]  D. Bates,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4 , 2015 .

[46]  M. Rugg,et al.  Modulation of event-related potentials by word repetition: the effects of inter-item lag. , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[47]  W. Chafe Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing , 1996 .

[48]  T. J. Schwartz,et al.  An electrophysiological analysis of modality-specific aspects of word repetition. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[49]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection theory: A user's guide, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[50]  M. Kutas,et al.  Fractionating the Word Repetition Effect with Event-Related Potentials , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[51]  E Halgren,et al.  Event-related potentials during lexical decision: effects of repetition, word frequency, pronounceability, and concreteness. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[52]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  Dissociating N400 Effects of Prediction from Association in Single-word Contexts , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[53]  M. Rugg Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high-and low-frequency words , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[54]  Benjamin Naumann The Architecture Of Cognition , 2016 .

[55]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  Great expectations: Specific lexical anticipation influences the processing of spoken language , 2007, BMC Neuroscience.

[56]  Patric Meyer,et al.  Recognition memory for one-trial-unitized word pairs: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2010, NeuroImage.

[57]  A. Friederici,et al.  Syntactic Gender and Semantic Expectancy: ERPs Reveal Early Autonomy and Late Interaction , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[58]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[59]  J. Grainger,et al.  The effects of prime visibility on ERP measures of masked priming. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[60]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[61]  Kara D. Federmeier Thinking ahead: the role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[62]  C. Van Petten,et al.  Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components. , 2012, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[63]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[64]  A. Kok On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[65]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[66]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Thinking ahead or not? Natural aging and anticipation during reading , 2012, Brain and Language.

[67]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[68]  M. Rugg The effects of semantic priming and work repetition on event-related potentials. , 1985, Psychophysiology.

[69]  S. Dornič,et al.  Attention and performance V , 1976 .

[70]  M Besson,et al.  The many facets of repetition: a cued-recall and event-related potential analysis of repeating words in same versus different sentence contexts. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[71]  P. Gordon,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for Reversed Lexical Repetition Effects in Language Processing , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[72]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[73]  M. Kutas,et al.  An Event-Related Potential (ERP) Analysis of Semantic Congruity and Repetition Effects in Sentences , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[74]  P. Gordon,et al.  Coreference and lexical repetition: Mechanisms of discourse integration , 2007, Memory & cognition.