Towards a decision-support tool for selecting an appropriate structural frame

The selection of the appropriate structural frame for a building during the conceptual design stage is crucial to the overall performance and value delivered to clients. Although several attempts have been made to develop IT-based decision support tools to select the structural frame, these have failed to recognise the importance of ‘soft’ performance criteria, primarily because of the complexity inherent in the selection process. In reality, structural frame selection is usually based upon heuristic decision-making dominated by subjectivity and qualitative reasoning. Following a thorough review of literature in the building performance domain, a tool that incorporates both ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ performance metrics for selecting appropriate structural frame was developed. The tool requires a systematic evaluation of the importance of each criterion and the likely performance achieved using various structural frame options. A worked example is provided to demonstrate how a project team can use this tool. This tool essentially helps to make explicit the most important issues to be considered during the selection process, which should demonstrably lead to improved performance and added value for clients.

[1]  Wolfgang F. E. Preiser,et al.  Towards a Performance-Based Conceptual Framework for Systematic Poes , 1989 .

[2]  James Douglas,et al.  Developments in Appraising the Total Performance of Buildings , 1994 .

[3]  Belinda L. Collins,et al.  Post-Occupancy Evaluation of the Forrestal Building , 1995 .

[4]  Willy Sher,et al.  Artificial neural network for the selection of buildable structural systems , 2003 .

[5]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  Criteria for assessing the potential performance of hybrid concrete structural frames , 2004 .

[6]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Assessing building performance in use 1: the Probe process , 2001 .

[7]  A.M.M Liu,et al.  Residential satisfaction in housing estates: a Hong Kong perspective , 1999 .

[8]  David. Proverbs,et al.  Demonstrating hybrid concrete construction performance through virtual simulation - A case study approach , 2004 .

[9]  Jacqueline Glass,et al.  Perceptions of hybrid concrete construction in the UK construction industry , 2001 .

[10]  Wolfgang F. E. Preiser,et al.  The habitability framework: a conceptual approach towards linking human behaviour and physical environment , 1983 .

[11]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  Empirical Evaluation of Structural Frame Performance Criteria: Realizing the Potential of Hybrid Concrete Construction , 2006 .

[12]  Wolfgang F. E. Preiser,et al.  Intelligent office building performance evaluation , 2002 .

[13]  J. Newman,et al.  IFESS: a computer tool to aid structural engineers at the conceptual design stage , 2003 .

[14]  Wolfgang F. E. Preiser,et al.  Post‐occupancy evaluation: how to make buildings work better , 1995 .

[15]  Amr A. Oloufa,et al.  Postoccupancy Evaluation of Buildings and Development of Facility Performance Criteria , 1995 .

[16]  George Heaney,et al.  Evaluating office environments using tenant organization perceptions , 1997 .