Articles 7 and 8 of the TRIPS Agreement: A Force for Convergence within the International IP System

Articles 7 and 8 of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement) provide express recognition for policy objectives that are fundamental to international intellectual property (IP) protection. Not only do they identify the goals of technological innovation and dissemination, but they also acknowledge the wider public interest agenda behind the TRIPS Agreement. While Articles 7 and 8 have acquired influence at a policy level through the Doha Ministerial Declaration and the Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health, their use within the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) Development Agenda and the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) has resulted in both an enhanced status within the wider policy arena and an enhanced legal significance, most notably in discussions on enforcement. By transcending treaty and forum boundaries, these provisions not only influence interpretative practice, they also encourage a convergence of policy objectives that facilitates greater coherency within the international system, and links IP with other areas of socio-economic importance. In other words, Articles 7 and 8 are poised to provide the foundation for a new legal and policy perspective on international IP regulation that is fully supportive of social as well as economic development in all participating nations.

[1]  S. Ilias.  The Proposed Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement: Background and Key Issues , 2012 .

[2]  Valbona Muzaka.  Linkages, contests and overlaps in the global intellectual property rights regime , 2011 .

[3]  Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan.  From TRIPS to ACTA: Towards a New 'Gold Standard' in Criminal IP Enforcement? , 2010 .

[4]  Anthea Roberts.  Power and Persuasion in Investment Treaty Interpretation: The Dual Role of States , 2010, American Journal of International Law.

[5]  Sungjoon Cho.  The Demise of Development in the Doha Round Negotiations , 2010 .

[6]  Susan K. Sell.  The Global IP Upward Ratchet, Anti-Counterfeiting and Piracy Enforcement Efforts: The State of Play , 2010 .

[7]  Timothy,et al.  International Soft Law , 2010 .

[8]  R. Dreyfuss,et al.  Designing a Global Intellectual Property System Responsive to Change: The WTO, WIPO and Beyond , 2009 .

[9]  Graeme Dinwoodie,et al.  Remarks: 'One Size Fits All': Consolidation and Difference in Intellectual Property Law , 2009 .

[10]  Peter K. Yu.  The Objectives and Principles of the TRIPs Agreement , 2009 .

[11]  Philip S. Yu.  A Tale of Two Development Agendas , 2009 .

[12]  C. Correa,et al.  Intellectual Property Enforcement , 2009 .

[13]  Ruth L. Okediji.  History Lessons for the WIPO Development Agenda , 2009 .

[14]  B. Mercurio,et al.  Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements: Intellectual property , 2009 .

[15]  P. Roffe,et al.  The WIPO Development Agenda in an Historical and Political Context , 2008 .

[16]  K. Maskus.  The WIPO Development Agenda , 2008 .

[17]  Jack I. Lerner.  Intellectual Property and Development at WHO and WIPO , 2008, American Journal of Law & Medicine.

[18]  E. T. Biadgleng,et al.  The Changing Structure and Governance of Intellectual Property Enforcement , 2008 .

[19]  A. Menescal.  Changing WIPO’s Ways? The 2004 Development Agenda in Historical Perspective , 2005 .

[20]  R. Howse.  The Canadian Generic Medicines Panel , 2005 .

[21]  D. Victor,et al.  The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources , 2004, International Organization.

[22]  Rochelle Cooper Dreyfuss,et al.  TRIPS-Round II: Should Users Strike Back? , 2004 .

[23]  L. Helfer.  Regime Shifting: The TRIPs Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking , 2003 .

[24]  Andrew T. Guzman.  A Compliance-Based Theory of International Law , 2002 .

[25]  D. Shanker.  The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, the Dispute Settlement System of the WTO and the Doha Declaration on the TRIPs Agreement , 2002, Journal of World Trade.

[26]  A. Boyle.  Some Reflections on the Relationship of Treaties and Soft Law , 1999, International and Comparative Law Quarterly.

[27]  H. Hillgenberg.  A Fresh Look at Soft Law , 1999 .

[28]  Pierre M. Dupuy.  Soft Law and the International Law of the Environment , 1990 .

[29]  Fritz Machlup,et al.  The Patent Controversy in the Nineteenth Century , 1950, The Journal of Economic History.