A multiobjective genetic algorithm approach to the optimization of the technical specifications of a nuclear safety system

Abstract Systems, structures, and components of Nuclear Power Plants are subject to Technical Specifications (TSs) that establish operational limitations and maintenance and test requirements with the objective of keeping the risk associated to the plant within the limits imposed by the regulatory agencies. Recently, in an effort to improve the competitiveness of nuclear energy in a deregulated market, modifications to maintenance policies and TSs are being considered within a risk-informed viewpoint, which judges the effectiveness of a TS, e.g. a particular maintenance policy, with respect to its implications on the safety and economics of the system operation. In this regard, a recent policy statement of the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission declares appropriate the use of Probabilistic Risk Assessment models to evaluate the effects on the system of a particular TS. These models rely on a set of parameters at the component level (failure rates, repair rates, frequencies of failure on demand, human error rates, inspection durations, and others) whose values are typically affected by uncertainties. Thus, the estimate of the system performance parameters corresponding to a given TS value must be supported by some measure of the associated uncertainty. In this paper we propose an approach, based on the effective coupling of genetic algorithms and Monte Carlo simulation, for the multiobjective optimization of the TSs of nuclear safety systems. The method transparently and explicitly accounts for the uncertainties in the model parameters by attempting to minimize both the expected value of the system unavailability and its associated variance. The costs of the alternative TSs solutions are included as constraints in the optimization. An application to the Reactor Protection Instrumentation System of a Pressurized Water Reactor is demonstrated.

[1]  Ioannis A. Papazoglou Risk-Informed Assessment of the Technical Specifications of PWR RPS Instrumentation , 2000 .

[2]  Michael C. Cheok,et al.  An approach for using risk assessment in risk-informed decisions on plant-specific changes to the licensing basis , 1999 .

[3]  Sebastian Martorell,et al.  Genetic algorithms in optimizing surveillance and maintenance of components , 1997 .

[4]  David B. Fogel,et al.  An introduction to simulated evolutionary optimization , 1994, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[5]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Optimizing maintenance and repair policies via a combination of genetic algorithms and Monte Carlo simulation , 2000, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[6]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Basics of the Monte Carlo Method with Application to System Reliability , 2002 .

[7]  I. A. Papazoglou,et al.  Reliability and Risk Allocation in Nuclear Power Plants: A Decision-Theoretic Approach , 1986 .

[8]  Geoffrey T. Parks,et al.  Multiobjective pressurized water reactor reload core design by nondominated genetic algorithm search , 1996 .

[9]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Muiltiobjective Optimization Using Nondominated Sorting in Genetic Algorithms , 1994, Evolutionary Computation.

[10]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[11]  Luca Podofillini,et al.  Condition-based maintenance optimization by means of genetic algorithms and Monte Carlo simulation , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[12]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Multiobjective optimization by genetic algorithms: application to safety systems , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[13]  Sofía Carlos,et al.  Constrained optimization of test intervals using a steady-state genetic algorithm , 2000, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach , 1999, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[15]  Hirotaka Nakayama,et al.  Theory of Multiobjective Optimization , 1985 .

[16]  D. Coit System-reliability confidence-intervals for complex-systems with estimated component-reliability , 1997 .

[17]  Joon-Eon Yang,et al.  Optimization of the Surveillance Test Interval of the Safety Systems at the Plant Level , 2000 .

[18]  Peter J. Fleming,et al.  An Overview of Evolutionary Algorithms in Multiobjective Optimization , 1995, Evolutionary Computation.

[19]  Luca Podofillini,et al.  Optimal reliability/availability of uncertain systems via multi-objective genetic algorithms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[20]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[21]  Peter J. Fleming,et al.  Genetic Algorithms for Multiobjective Optimization: FormulationDiscussion and Generalization , 1993, ICGA.

[22]  Hiroshi Sekimoto,et al.  A method to improve multiobjective genetic algorithm optimization of a self-fuel-providing LMFBR by niche induction among nondominated solutions , 2000 .

[23]  Tunc Aldemir,et al.  Optimization of standby safety system maintenance schedules in nuclear power plants , 1996 .

[24]  David W. Coit,et al.  Considering risk profiles in design optimization for series-parallel systems , 1997, Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium.

[25]  P. L. Hendricks FIND: Reference Safety Analysis Report (RESAR-3S) , 1976 .