A hybrid approach with agent-based simulation and clustering for sociograms

In the last years, some features of sociograms have proven to be strongly related to the performance of groups. However, the prediction of sociograms according to the features of individuals is still an open issue. In particular, the current approach presents a hybrid approach between agent-based simulation and clustering for simulating sociograms according to the psychological features of their members. This approach performs the clustering extracting certain types of individuals regarding their psychological characteristics, from training data. New people can then be associated with one of the types in order to run a sociogram simulation. This approach has been implemented with the tool called CLUS-SOCI (an agent-based and CLUStering tool for simulating SOCIograms). The current approach has been experienced with real data from four different secondary schools, with 38 real sociograms involving 714 students. Two thirds of these data were used for training the tool, while the remaining third was used for validating it. In the validation data, the resulting simulated sociograms were similar to the real ones in terms of cohesion, coherence of reciprocal relations and intensity, according to the binomial test with the correction of Bonferroni.

[1]  S. Joseph,et al.  Development of the multidimensional peer-victimization scale , 2000 .

[2]  Rui Xu,et al.  Survey of clustering algorithms , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[3]  J. Harding,et al.  Sociometry, experimental method and the science of society: An approach to a new political orientation. , 1952 .

[4]  W. Bukowski,et al.  Children's peer relations: a meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  N. Crick,et al.  Children's treatment by peers: Victims of relational and overt aggression , 1996, Development and Psychopathology.

[6]  Kathryn E. Hoff,et al.  The association between high status positions and aggressive behavior in early adolescence. , 2009, Journal of school psychology.

[7]  Sally Roberts.  Using practitioner research to investigate the role of the teacher in encouraging student interaction within group work. , 2008, Nurse education today.

[8]  S GOLDSTONE,et al.  SOCIOMETRIC STATUS AND APPARENT DURATION. , 1963, The Journal of social psychology.

[9]  Sue J. Waite,et al.  Peer groups and children’s development , 2012 .

[10]  Erik Jan van Leeuwen,et al.  Algorithms for diversity and clustering in social networks through dot product graphs , 2015, Soc. Networks.

[11]  James A. Davis,et al.  Sociometric triads as multi‐variate systems† , 1977 .

[12]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[13]  Christophe Le Page,et al.  Agent based simulation of a small catchment water management in northern Thailand: Description of the CATCHSCAPE model , 2003 .

[14]  Melanie J. Zimmer-Gembeck,et al.  Connected and Isolated Victims of Relational Aggression: Associations with Peer Group Status and Differences between Girls and Boys , 2013 .

[15]  A. Maslow.  A Theory of Human Motivation , 1943 .

[16]  M. Marchesi,et al.  Agent-based simulation of a financial market , 2001, cond-mat/0103600.

[17]  Joaquín Izquierdo,et al.  GPR data analysis using multi-agent and clustering approaches: A tool for technical management of water supply systems , 2014, Digit. Signal Process..

[18]  Anil K. Jain.  Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means , 2008, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[19]  Antonius H. N. Cillessen,et al.  The role of attractiveness and aggression in high school popularity , 2011 .

[20]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[21]  M. Macy,et al.  FROM FACTORS TO ACTORS: Computational Sociology and Agent-Based Modeling , 2002 .

[22]  César Coll,et al.  Distributed Teaching Presence and communicative patterns in asynchronous learning: Name versus reply networks , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[23]  Celia A. Brownell,et al.  Childhood Peer Relationships: Social Acceptance, Friendships, and Peer Networks. , 2003 .

[24]  Francis J. Yammarino,et al.  Leadership emergence in face-to-face and virtual teams: A multi-level model with agent-based simulations, quasi-experimental and experimental tests , 2015 .

[25]  M. Zimmer‐Gembeck,et al.  Relation of depression and anxiety to self- and peer-reported relational aggression. , 2012, Aggressive behavior.

[26]  Todd D. Little,et al.  Disentangling the “whys” from the “whats” of aggressive behaviour , 2003 .

[27]  Iván García-Magariño,et al.  PEABS: A Process for developing Efficient Agent-Based Simulators , 2015, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[28]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Information Science and Statistics) , 2006 .

[29]  Angel Barrasa,et al.  Un programa informático para el cálculo y la representación de índices y valores sociométricos , 2004 .

[30]  Chen Dongsheng,et al.  The heterogeneous effects of ability grouping on national college entrance exam performance – evidence from a large city in China , 2014 .

[31]  L. Wasserman,et al.  Practical Bayesian Density Estimation Using Mixtures of Normals , 1997 .

[32]  Mustapha Chérif-Eddine Yagoub,et al.  Two-tier particle swarm optimization protocol for clustering and routing in wireless sensor network , 2015, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[33]  S. Leinhardt.  Developmental Change in the Sentiment Structure of Children's Groups , 1972 .

[34]  Christopher M. Danforth,et al.  An evolutionary algorithm approach to link prediction in dynamic social networks , 2013, J. Comput. Sci..

[35]  Carlo Giudicianni,et al.  Water Distribution System Clustering and Partitioning Based on Social Network Algorithms , 2015 .

[36]  Penny Rheingans,et al.  Visualizing Student Histories Using Clustering and Composition , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[37]  Thomas U. Grund,et al.  Network structure and team performance: The case of English Premier League soccer teams , 2012, Soc. Networks.

[38]  Carlos Angel Iglesias,et al.  Evaluating social choice techniques into intelligent environments by agent based social simulation , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[39]  Omar López Ortega.  An agent-oriented decision support system combining fuzzy clustering and the AHP , 2011 .

[40]  Ling Chen,et al.  An efficient algorithm for link prediction in temporal uncertain social networks , 2016, Inf. Sci..

[41]  Jennie J. DeGenaro.  Condensing the Student Profile , 1988 .

[42]  Kevin T. Comer,et al.  An agent-based model of network effects on tax compliance and evasion , 2014 .

[43]  Frans Prenkert,et al.  Relationship Strength and Network Form: An Agent-Based Simulation of Interaction in a Business Network , 2014 .

[44]  Frank Puppe,et al.  Techniques for Analysis and Calibration of Multi-agent Simulations , 2004, ESAW.

[45]  Ana L. C. Bazzan,et al.  Distributed clustering for group formation and task allocation in multiagent systems: A swarm intelligence approach , 2012, Appl. Soft Comput..

[46]  Iván García-Magariño,et al.  FTS-SOCI: An agent-based framework for simulating teaching strategies with evolutions of sociograms , 2015, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[47]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[48]  Domenico Rosaci,et al.  Agent clustering based on semantic negotiation , 2008, TAAS.

[49]  Andrés Martin,et al.  Peer Rejection: Developmental Processes and Intervention Strategies , 2005 .

[50]  K. Puura,et al.  Psychiatric disorders and the use of mental health services among children involved in bullying , 2001 .

[51]  K. Bierman,et al.  Characteristics of aggressive-rejected, aggressive (nonrejected), and rejected (nonaggressive) boys. , 1993, Child development.

[52]  Xiaoyang Yu,et al.  Mining community and inferring friendship in mobile social networks , 2016, Neurocomputing.