Numerical simulation of debris-flow behavior incorporating a dynamic method for estimating the entrainment

Abstract There is a pressing need to estimate debris-flow entrainment because several lines of studies have substantiated that the magnitude of a debris flow may grow manyfold due to sediment entrainment. In this paper, we present a two-dimensional numerical model of debris-flow behavior for estimating entrainment over complex topography. The model is governed by a numerical integration of the depth-average motion equations using shallow water approximation. The governing equations are numerically solved using the semi-Lagrangian method in an explicit finite difference grid. Compared to previous models, the presented model highlights the importance of entrainment, and incorporates a physically-based dynamic method to estimate the entrainment rate. The entrainment rate can be predicted using reasonable assumptions regarding the velocity profile of the debris flow and the rapidly changing pore pressure of the bed sediment. The stability of the presented model is first illustrated by a hypothesized dam-breaking problem; the effectiveness of the implemented model entrainment process is subsequently tested on the 2010 Yohutagawa debris-flow event in Japan. The test indicates that the presented method can be satisfactorily used to simulate debris-flow behavior and the entrainment process. A discussion regarding the advantages and limitations of the model concludes the paper.

[1]  D. Rickenmann,et al.  Erosion by debris flows in field and laboratory experiments , 2003 .

[2]  M. Jakob,et al.  The significance of channel recharge rates for estimating debris‐flow magnitude and frequency , 2005 .

[3]  P. Burlando,et al.  Field experiments and numerical modeling of mass entrainment in snow avalanches , 2006 .

[4]  Guangqi Chen,et al.  GIS-based numerical simulation of Amamioshima debris flow in Japan , 2013 .

[5]  M. Pastor,et al.  Numerical study on the entrainment of bed material into rapid landslides , 2012 .

[6]  Scott McDougall,et al.  Two numerical models for landslide dynamic analysis , 2009, Comput. Geosci..

[7]  C. J. van Westen,et al.  Analysis of debris flow behavior with a one dimensional run-out model incorporating entrainment , 2012 .

[8]  A. Skempton.  THE PORE-PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS A AND B , 1954 .

[9]  Guang-qi Chen,et al.  A numerical simulation of volumetric enlargement for seismic debris flow using integrated DDA and KANAKO 2D , 2013 .

[10]  Peter Rutschmann,et al.  Comparison of flow resistance relations for debris flows using a one-dimensional finite element simulation model , 2006 .

[11]  Wolfgang Schwanghart,et al.  TopoToolbox: A set of Matlab functions for topographic analysis , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[12]  R. Courant,et al.  Über die partiellen Differenzengleichungen der mathematischen Physik , 1928 .

[13]  Kyoji Sassa,et al.  Downslope volume enlargement of a debris slide–debris flow in the 1999 Hiroshima, Japan, rainstorm , 2003 .

[14]  D. Lin,et al.  Numerical simulations of flow motion and deposition characteristics of granular debris flows , 2009 .

[15]  J. N. Hutchinson,et al.  Undrained Loading, A Fundamental Mechanism of Mudflows and other Mass Movements , 1971 .

[16]  T. Esaki,et al.  GIS-based two-dimensional numerical simulation of rainfall-induced debris flow , 2008 .

[17]  Nick Martin,et al.  MOD_FreeSurf2D: A MATLAB surface fluid flow model for rivers and streams , 2005, Comput. Geosci..

[18]  Anne Mangeney,et al.  Geomorphology: Landslide boost from entrainment , 2011 .

[19]  N. Mangold,et al.  Erosion and mobility in granular collapse over sloping beds , 2010 .

[20]  Richard M. Iverson,et al.  Flow of variably fluidized granular masses across three‐dimensional terrain: 1. Coulomb mixture theory , 2001 .

[21]  Yi-Chin Chen,et al.  Large-scale simulation of watershed mass transport: a case study of Tsengwen reservoir watershed, southwest Taiwan , 2013, Natural Hazards.

[22]  Harry M. Blijenberg,et al.  Application of physical modelling of debris flow triggering to field conditions: Limitations posed by boundary conditions , 2007 .

[23]  Matthias Jakob,et al.  The role of debris supply conditions in predicting debris flow activity , 1999 .

[24]  M. Flower,et al.  “Block-in-matrix” fabrics that lack shearing but possess composite cleavage planes: A sedimentary mélange origin for the Yuwan accretionary complex in the Ryukyu island arc, Japan , 2009 .

[25]  F. Bouchut,et al.  On new erosion models of Savage–Hutter type for avalanches , 2008 .

[26]  Experimental study on the entrainment of bed material into debris flow , 2001 .

[27]  Guangqi Chen,et al.  GIS-based numerical modelling of debris flow motion across three-dimensional terrain , 2013, Journal of Mountain Science.

[28]  Jim E. O'Connor,et al.  Debris flows from failures Neoglacial-age moraine dams in the Three Sisters and Mount Jefferson wilderness areas, Oregon , 2001 .

[29]  Jeffrey A. Coe,et al.  Alpine debris flows triggered by a 28 July 1999 thunderstorm in the central Front Range, Colorado , 2007 .

[30]  D. F. VanDine,et al.  History and Goals of Canadian Debris Flow Research, A Review , 2002 .

[31]  G. Tucker,et al.  Sediment entrainment by debris flows: In situ measurements from the headwaters of a steep catchment , 2012 .

[32]  Allen Bateman,et al.  Application of FLATModel, a 2D finite volume code, to debris flows in the northeastern part of the Iberian Peninsula , 2008 .

[33]  Guang-qi Chen,et al.  A new approach for analyzing the velocity distribution of debris flows at typical cross-sections , 2014, Natural Hazards.

[34]  Oldrich Hungr,et al.  A model for the runout analysis of rapid flow slides, debris flows, and avalanches , 1995 .

[35]  Chuan Tang,et al.  Formation and activation of catastrophic debris flows in Baishui River basin, Sichuan Province, China , 2014, Landslides.

[36]  S. Savage,et al.  The motion of a finite mass of granular material down a rough incline , 1989, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[37]  Scott McDougall,et al.  Dynamic modelling of entrainment in rapid landslides , 2005 .

[38]  Giovanni B. Crosta,et al.  Numerical modeling of 2‐D granular step collapse on erodible and nonerodible surface , 2009 .

[39]  R. Iverson,et al.  Grain-size segregation and levee formation in geophysical mass flows , 2012 .

[40]  Alessandro Simoni,et al.  Field observations of a debris flow event in the Dolomites , 1999 .

[41]  Aronne Armanini,et al.  Two-dimensional simulation of debris flows in erodible channels , 2009, Comput. Geosci..

[42]  Kaare Høeg,et al.  Erosion and morphology of a debris flow caused by a glacial lake outburst flood, Western Norway , 2008 .

[43]  Jun Yang.  Pore pressure coefficient for soil and rock and its relation to compressional wave velocity , 2005 .

[44]  D. Hershey.  Finite Difference Calculus , 1973 .

[45]  Oldrich Hungr,et al.  Quantitative analysis of debris torrent hazards for design of remedial measures , 1984 .

[46]  Giovanni B. Crosta,et al.  Numerical modelling of entrainment/deposition in rock and debris-avalanches , 2009 .

[47]  Marc Christen,et al.  RAMMS: numerical simulation of dense snow avalanches in three-dimensional terrain , 2010 .

[48]  J. Hervouet.  A high resolution 2-D dam-break model using parallelization , 2000 .

[49]  R. Guthrie,et al.  Exploring the magnitude–frequency distribution: a cellular automata model for landslides , 2008 .

[50]  Kyoji Sassa,et al.  Geotechnical model for the motion of landslides , 1988 .

[51]  J. Imran,et al.  1D Numerical Model of Muddy Subaqueous and Subaerial Debris Flows , 2001 .

[52]  K. Kelfoun,et al.  Numerical modeling of the emplacement of Socompa rock avalanche, Chile , 2005 .

[53]  Lev S. Tsimring,et al.  Avalanche mobility induced by the presence of an erodible bed and associated entrainment , 2007 .

[54]  Marcel Hürlimann,et al.  Estimate of the debris-flow entrainment using field and topographical data , 2014, Natural Hazards.

[55]  N. Hotta,et al.  Pore-Water pressure of debris flows , 2000 .

[56]  M. Papa,et al.  Critical conditions of bed sediment entrainment due to debris flow , 2004 .

[57]  P. Santi,et al.  Debris flows and their toll on human life: a global analysis of debris-flow fatalities from 1950 to 2011 , 2014, Natural Hazards.

[58]  Jean-Philippe Malet,et al.  A GIS-based numerical model for simulating the kinematics of mud and debris flows over complex terrain , 2009 .

[59]  C. F. Lee,et al.  Erosional effects on runout of fast landslides, debris flows , 2006 .

[60]  Pilar García-Navarro,et al.  1D Mathematical modelling of debris flow , 2000 .

[61]  Richard M. Iverson,et al.  Elementary theory of bed‐sediment entrainment by debris flows and avalanches , 2012 .

[62]  Richard M. Iverson,et al.  Positive feedback and momentum growth during debris-flow entrainment of wet bed sediment , 2011 .

[63]  Harry B. Bingham,et al.  On the accuracy of finite-difference solutions for nonlinear water waves , 2007 .

[64]  Tamotsu Takahashi,et al.  Mechanical Characteristics of Debris Flow , 1978 .