Mouse brain extraction using 2-Stage CNNs

Magnetic resonance imaging of mice and other small animals plays an important role in translational medicine, where animal models are essential in the study of diseases and their potential treatments. While a large number of brain imaging studies using mice are conducted every year, there are few tools designed specifically for analyzing mouse MRI. Researchers often resort to adapting tools designed for processing MRI of human brains to work for the different structure, composition, and appearance of the mouse brain. While these methods may provide a reasonable initialization, researchers often have to perform extensive manual editing. In this work, we adapted a patch-based 2-Stage CNN Architecture to segment brain and non-brain in mouse MRI. We trained our model using brain MRI of healthy mice and mice with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. These images had been previously acquired by our research team and processed to extract the brain using detailed manual editing. We compared our method with five existing tools, including BSE,1 rBET,2 AFNI,3 PCNN,4 and nnU-Net,5 using manually delineated mouse MRI. Both our method and nnU-Net achieved mean Dice scores on the order of 0.99 and HD95 measures on the order of one voxel, substantially outperforming the other methods. Our proposed method had slightly better Dice, HD99, and sensitivity measures than nnU-Net, while nnU-Net had slightly better HD95 scores. While these differences were small enough that further evaluation of the methods on a broader set of images would be warranted, they do suggest that our proposed method is competitive with a state-of-the-art deep learning method.

[1]  Jens Petersen,et al.  nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation , 2020, Nature Methods.

[2]  Snehashis Roy,et al.  A deep learning framework for brain extraction in humans and animals with traumatic brain injury , 2018, 2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2018).

[3]  Mehran Ebrahimi,et al.  Two-Stage Convolutional Neural Network for Breast Cancer Histology Image Classification , 2018, ICIAR.

[4]  J Godart,et al.  What is the optimal number of library plans in ART for locally advanced cervical cancer? , 2017, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[5]  Allan MacKenzie-Graham,et al.  In vivo magnetic resonance images reveal neuroanatomical sex differences through the application of voxel-based morphometry in C57BL/6 mice , 2017, NeuroImage.

[6]  Thomas Brox,et al.  U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.

[7]  Guy B. Williams,et al.  Voxel-based morphometry with templates and validation in a mouse model of Huntington’s disease , 2013, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[8]  Tobias C. Wood,et al.  rBET: Making BET work for Rodent Brains , 2013 .

[9]  Anqi Qiu,et al.  Robust Automatic Rodent Brain Extraction Using 3-D Pulse-Coupled Neural Networks (PCNN) , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[10]  Shie Mannor,et al.  A Tutorial on the Cross-Entropy Method , 2005, Ann. Oper. Res..

[11]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast robust automated brain extraction , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[12]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  BrainSuite: An Automated Cortical Surface Identification Tool , 2000, MICCAI.

[13]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[14]  L. R. Dice Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species , 1945 .