[Allergic contact dermatitis to metals over a 20-year period in the Centre of Portugal: evaluation of the effects of the European directives].

INTRODUCTION Metals are a common cause of allergic contact dermatitis. After the introduction of the EU Nickel Directive (1994/27/CE; 2004/96/EC) and, more recently, the Cement Directive (2003/53/EC) there has been a significant decrease in sensitization to metals mainly in the Nordic countries. The applicability of these directives and their impact in the Portuguese population is unknown. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective study (1992-2011) was carried out in our patch test clinic to assess the temporal trend of metal sensitization (nickel [Ni], cobalt [Co] and chromium [Cr]) along the last 20 years, particularly considering age, sex and its relation with occupational activity. RESULTS Out of 5 250 consecutively patch-tested patients, 1 626 (31%) were reactive to at least one metal (26.5% to Ni; 10.0% to Co and 7.9% to Cr). Women had a higher prevalence of sensitization to Ni (34.4% vs 8.9%) whereas men were more reactive to Cr (11.5% vs 5.0%). Nickel sensitization did not decrease significantly over the years, although in recent years among women sensitized to nickel the percentage of younger patients (16-30 years-old) is significantly lower (p < 0.001). Chromium sensitization significantly decreased, particularly in men (r = -0.535), and mainly in the construction workers (r = -0.639). Chromium reactivity associated with the shoe dermatitis has remained stable. DISCUSSION We emphasize the higher and stable percentage of nickel sensitized individuals suggesting, so far, a low impact from the EU Ni directive, although a decreasing percentage in the the younger group among Ni sensitized women may suggest a beneficial effect is becoming evident is this age group. On the contrary, the impact of the directive regarding the modification of Cr in cement seems to be effective. There is now a need to regulate chromium content in leather products, namely in shoes. CONCLUSIONS The regulation of interventional measures related either to the manufacture and trade of adornments or professional use will better protect the population of allergy to metals.

[1]  Y. Yoshihisa,et al.  Metal Allergy and Systemic Contact Dermatitis: An Overview , 2012, Dermatology research and practice.

[2]  M. Aguilar-Bernier,et al.  Contact Sensitization to Allergens in the Spanish Standard Series at Hospital Costa del Sol in Marbella, Spain: A Retrospective Study (2005–2010) ☆ , 2012 .

[3]  M. Strandesen,et al.  Chromium in leather footwear—risk assessment of chromium allergy and dermatitis , 2012, Contact dermatitis.

[4]  J. Thyssen,et al.  Nickel and cobalt allergy before and after nickel regulation – evaluation of a public health intervention , 2011, Contact dermatitis.

[5]  W. Uter,et al.  Nickel allergy in Spain needs active intervention , 2011, Contact dermatitis.

[6]  W. Uter,et al.  The EU Nickel Directive revisited—future steps towards better protection against nickel allergy , 2011, Contact dermatitis.

[7]  J. Thyssen,et al.  Identification of metallic items that caused nickel dermatitis in Danish patients , 2010, Contact dermatitis.

[8]  J. Thyssen,et al.  Cobalt release from inexpensive jewellery: has the use of cobalt replaced nickel following regulatory intervention? , 2010, Contact dermatitis.

[9]  A. Linneberg,et al.  Nickel allergy in Danish women before and after nickel regulation. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  A. Linneberg,et al.  The association between hand eczema and nickel allergy has weakened among young women in the general population following the Danish nickel regulation: results from two cross‐sectional studies , 2009, Contact dermatitis.

[11]  K. Engkilde,et al.  The prevalence of chromium allergy in Denmark is currently increasing as a result of leather exposure , 2009, The British journal of dermatology.

[12]  P. Elsner,et al.  The European baseline series in 10 European Countries, 2005/2006 – Results of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA) , 2009, Contact dermatitis.

[13]  E. Warshaw,et al.  Genetics of nickel allergic contact dermatitis. , 2007, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[14]  J. Johansen,et al.  Experimental nickel elicitation thresholds – a review focusing on occluded nickel exposure , 2005, Contact dermatitis.

[15]  H. Maibach,et al.  Relationship of occupation to contact dermatitis: evaluation in patients tested from 1998 to 2000. , 2002, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

[16]  M. O. Speidel,et al.  Metallurgy: High nickel release from 1- and 2-euro coins , 2002, Nature.

[17]  W. Aberer,et al.  The new EURO releases nickel and elicits contact eczema , 2002, The British journal of dermatology.

[18]  D. Gawkrodger Nickel dermatitis: how much nickel is safe? , 1996, Contact dermatitis.

[19]  T. Agner,et al.  Chromium allergy in consecutive patients in a country where ferrous sulfate has been added to cement since 1981 , 1996, Contact dermatitis.

[20]  T. Menné,et al.  Nickel sensitization and ear piercing in an unselected Danish population , 1993, Contact dermatitis.

[21]  C. Lidén Nickel in jewellery and associated products , 1992, Contact dermatitis.

[22]  J. Vilaplana,et al.  New trends in the use of metals in jewellery , 1991, Contact dermatitis.

[23]  T. Menné,et al.  Patch test reactivity to nickel alloys , 1987, Contact dermatitis.

[24]  L. Widström,et al.  Ear piercing – a cause of nickel allergy in schoolgirls? , 1985, Contact dermatitis.

[25]  M. Aguilar-Bernier,et al.  [Contact sensitization to allergens in the Spanish standard series at Hospital Costa del Sol in Marbella, Spain: a retrospective study (2005-2010)]. , 2012, Actas dermo-sifiliograficas.

[26]  Susun Bellew,et al.  Prevalence of nickel and cobalt allergy among female patients with dermatitis before and after Danish government regulation: A 23-year retrospective study , 2011 .

[27]  H. Maibach,et al.  Management of Positive Patch Test Reactions , 2003, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[28]  S. Fregert,et al.  Terminology of contact dermatitis. , 1970, Acta dermato-venereologica.