Automatic Human Knee Cartilage Segmentation From 3-D Magnetic Resonance Images

This study aimed at developing a new automatic segmentation algorithm for human knee cartilage volume quantification from MRI. Imaging was performed using a 3T scanner and a knee coil, and the exam consisted of a double echo steady state (DESS) sequence, which contrasts cartilage and soft tissues including the synovial fluid. The algorithm was developed on MRI 3-D images in which the bone-cartilage interface for the femur and tibia was segmented by an independent segmentation process, giving a parametric surface of the interface. First, the MR images are resampled in the neighborhood of the bone surface. Second, by using texture-analysis techniques optimized by filtering, the cartilage is discriminated as a bright and homogeneous tissue. This process of excluding soft tissues enables the detection of the external boundary of the cartilage. Third, a technology based on a Bayesian decision criterion enables the automatic separation of the cartilage and synovial fluid. Finally, the cartilage volume and changes in volume for an individual between visits was assessed using the developed technology. Validation included first, for nine knee osteoarthritis patients, a comparison of the cartilage volume and changes over time between the developed automatic system and a validated semi-automatic cartilage volume system, and second, for five knee osteoarthritis patients, a test-retest procedure. Data revealed excellent Pearson correlations and Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) for the global knee (r = 0.96 , p <; 0.0001, and median DSC = 0.84), for the femur ( r = 0.95, p <; 0.0001, and median DSC = 0.85 ), and the tibia (r = 0.83, p <; 0.0001, and median DSC = 0.84). Very good similarity between the automatic and semi-automatic methods in regard to cartilage loss was also found for the global knee (r = 0.76 and p = 0.016) as well as for the femur (r = 0.79 and p = 0.011). The test-retest revealed an excellent measurement error of -0.3 ±1.6% for the global knee and 0.14 ±1.7% for the femur. In conclusion, the newly developed fully automatic method described herein provides accurate and precise quantification of knee cartilage volume and will be a valuable tool for clinical follow-up studies.

[1]  M. Karsdal,et al.  Separation of healthy and early osteoarthritis by automatic quantification of cartilage homogeneity. , 2007, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[2]  F Eckstein,et al.  Double echo steady state magnetic resonance imaging of knee articular cartilage at 3 Tesla: a pilot study for the Osteoarthritis Initiative , 2005, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[3]  Stuart Crozier,et al.  Automatic Segmentation of Articular Cartilage in Magnetic Resonance Images of the Knee , 2007, MICCAI.

[4]  P. Podsiadło,et al.  Automated classification of articular cartilage surfaces based on surface texture , 2006, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[5]  F Eckstein,et al.  Interindividual variability and correlation among morphological parameters of knee joint cartilage plates: analysis with three-dimensional MR imaging. , 2001, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[6]  Ole Fogh Olsen,et al.  Automatic Segmentation of the Articular Cartilage in Knee MRI Using a Hierarchical Multi-class Classification Scheme , 2005, MICCAI.

[7]  F. Cicuttini,et al.  Comparison and reproducibility of fast and conventional spoiled gradient‐echo magnetic resonance sequences in the determination of knee cartilage volume , 2000, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[8]  Johanne Martel-Pelletier,et al.  Use of Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Evaluation of Structural Changes in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients , 2008 .

[9]  Olivier D. Faugeras,et al.  Segmentation of Bone in Clinical Knee MRI Using Texture-Based Geodesic Active Contours , 1998, MICCAI.

[10]  W. Bradley,et al.  MRI: The Basics , 1997 .

[11]  F. Cicuttini,et al.  Comparison of tibial cartilage volume and radiologic grade of the tibiofemoral joint. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[12]  Stuart Crozier,et al.  Automatic Segmentation and Quantitative Analysis of the Articular Cartilages From Magnetic Resonance Images of the Knee , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Kenneth D Brandt,et al.  Etiopathogenesis of osteoarthritis. , 2009, The Medical clinics of North America.

[14]  R. Burgkart,et al.  Precision of tibial cartilage morphometry with a coronal water-excitation MR sequence , 2000, European Radiology.

[15]  Zhengyou Zhang,et al.  Iterative point matching for registration of free-form curves and surfaces , 1994, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[16]  Mary E. S. Loomis,et al.  The Basics: , 1990, Is That True?.

[17]  David Thomasson,et al.  Optimization of a dual echo in the steady state (DESS) free‐precession sequence for imaging cartilage , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  R. Moskowitz,et al.  Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. , 1986, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[19]  L R Frank,et al.  Articular cartilage in the knee: mapping of the physiologic parameters at MR imaging with a local gradient coil--preliminary results. , 1999, Radiology.

[20]  J. Buckland-Wright,et al.  Quantitative radiography of osteoarthritis. , 1994, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[21]  Ronenn Roubenoff,et al.  Arthritis and Allied Conditions: A Textbook of Rheumatology , 1993 .

[22]  Cristian Lorenz,et al.  Fast automated object detection by recursive casting of search rays , 2005 .

[23]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[24]  R Burgkart,et al.  Long-term and resegmentation precision of quantitative cartilage MR imaging (qMRI). , 2002, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[25]  J. Eng,et al.  Sample Size Estimation : How Many Individuals Should Be Studied ? , 2022 .

[26]  R Burgkart,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging-based assessment of cartilage loss in severe osteoarthritis: accuracy, precision, and diagnostic value. , 2001, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[27]  C C Glüer,et al.  Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imaging: optimization and validation. , 1994, Radiology.

[28]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Improved watershed transform for medical image segmentation using prior information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[29]  M. Hochberg,et al.  Reliability of a quantification imaging system using magnetic resonance images to measure cartilage thickness and volume in human normal and osteoarthritic knees. , 2003, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[30]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of articular cartilage in knee osteoarthritis (OA): morphological assessment. , 2006, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[31]  F Eckstein,et al.  Non-invasive determination of cartilage thickness throughout joint surfaces using magnetic resonance imaging. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  R. Abugharbieh,et al.  Multi-Contrast MR for Enhanced Bone Imaging and Segmentation , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[33]  Kenneth D Brandt,et al.  Etiopathogenesis of osteoarthritis. , 2008, Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America.

[34]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Risk factors for progressive cartilage loss in the knee: a longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study in forty-three patients. , 2002, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[35]  F. Cicuttini,et al.  The determinants of change in tibial cartilage volume in osteoarthritic knees. , 2002, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[36]  Claude Kauffmann,et al.  Computer-aided method for quantification of cartilage thickness and volume changes using MRI: validation study using a synthetic model , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[37]  Xiaodong Wu,et al.  Simultaneous Segmentation of Multiple Closed Surfaces Using Optimal Graph Searching , 2005, IPMI.

[38]  Johanne Martel-Pelletier,et al.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of knee osteoarthritis progression over two years and correlation with clinical symptoms and radiologic changes. , 2004, Arthritis and rheumatism.