Using multicriteria decision analysis during drug development to predict reimbursement decisions

Background Pharmaceutical companies design clinical development programs to generate the data that they believe will support reimbursement for the experimental compound. Objective The objective of the study was to present a process for using multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) by a pharmaceutical company to estimate the probability of a positive recommendation for reimbursement for a new drug given drug and environmental attributes. Methods The MCDA process included 1) selection of decisions makers who were representative of those making reimbursement decisions in a specific country; 2) two pre-workshop questionnaires to identify the most important attributes and their relative importance for a positive recommendation for a new drug; 3) a 1-day workshop during which participants undertook three tasks: i) they agreed on a final list of decision attributes and their importance weights, ii) they developed level descriptions for these attributes and mapped each attribute level to a value function, and iii) they developed profiles for hypothetical products ‘just likely to be reimbursed’; and 4) use of the data from the workshop to develop a prediction algorithm based on a logistic regression analysis. The MCDA process is illustrated using case studies for three countries, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Spain. The extent to which the prediction algorithms for each country captured the decision processes for the workshop participants in our case studies was tested using a post-meeting questionnaire that asked the participants to make recommendations for a set of hypothetical products. Results The data collected in the case study workshops resulted in a prediction algorithm: 1) for the United Kingdom, the probability of a positive recommendation for different ranges of cost-effectiveness ratios; 2) for Spain, the probability of a positive recommendation at the national and regional levels; and 3) for Germany, the probability of a determination of clinical benefit. The results from the post-meeting questionnaire revealed a high predictive value for the algorithm developed using MCDA. Conclusions Prediction algorithms developed using MCDA could be used by pharmaceutical companies when designing their clinical development programs to estimate the likelihood of a favourable reimbursement recommendation for different product profiles and for different positions in the treatment pathway.

[1]  N. Devlin,et al.  Operationalizing Value-Based Pricing of Medicines , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.

[2]  David Parkin,et al.  Does NICE have a cost-effectiveness threshold and what other factors influence its decisions? A binary choice analysis. , 2004, Health economics.

[3]  Kristin L. Sainani,et al.  Logistic Regression , 2014, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[4]  L. Phillips,et al.  Multi-criteria analysis: a manual , 2009 .

[5]  J. Bridges,et al.  The changing role of economic evaluation in valuing medical technologies , 2012, Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research.

[6]  H. Kenneth Hudnell,et al.  Cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms: state of the science and research needs. Proceedings of the Interagency, International Symposium on Cyanobacterial Harmful Algal Blooms (ISOC-HAB). , 2008, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology.

[7]  Jon Sussex,et al.  Operationalising Value Based Pricing of Medicines: A Taxonomy of Approaches , 2011 .

[8]  Elijah Dixon,et al.  Multi-criteria development and incorporation into decision tools for health technology adoption. , 2013, Journal of health organization and management.

[9]  Lord Bourne,et al.  Department for Communities and Local Government: Troubled families programme: transforming the lives of thousands of families , 2016 .

[10]  Jing Jing Li,et al.  The Role of Value for Money in Public Insurance Coverage Decisions for Drugs in Australia: A Retrospective Analysis 1994-2004 , 2008, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[11]  Sam Salek,et al.  A quantitative approach to benefit‐risk assessment of medicines – part 1: the development of a new model using multi‐criteria decision analysis , 2007, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[12]  Silvio Giove,et al.  An application of multicriteria decision making to built heritage. The redevelopment of Venice Arsenale , 2010 .

[13]  L. Garattini,et al.  Pricing and reimbursement of in-patent drugs in seven European countries: a comparative analysis. , 2007, Health policy.

[14]  Mark Sculpher,et al.  REPORT BY THE DECISION SUPPORT UNIT , 2010 .

[15]  F. Antoñanzas,et al.  Economic aspects of the new Spanish laws on pharmaceutical preparations , 2007, The European Journal of Health Economics.

[16]  Alessio Ishizaka,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis , 2013 .

[17]  P. Oh,et al.  Bridging health technology assessment (HTA) with multicriteria decision analyses (MCDA): field testing of the EVIDEM framework for coverage decisions by a public payer in Canada , 2011, BMC health services research.

[18]  Alejandra Duenas,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis for health technology assessment. , 2012, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[19]  L. Phillips,et al.  Benefits-risk assessment model for medicines: developing a structured approach to decision making , 2006 .