Locality and the nature of nasal harmony

There is a general consensus in phonology that relations conform to a locality requirement imposing a strict adjacency condition on related entities. One pattern of nasal harmony adheres to this condition; nasality extends over a sequence of segments that may include vowels, semivowels, liquids, nasals and fricatives, and no segments can be skipped. In another pattern, locality appears to be violated, because obstruents are invariably transparent. This paper proposes a novel solution to the locality problem posed by the latter by advancing a theory in which nasality always spreads locally either at the segmental level or at the level of the heads/nucleus of syllables. The apparent skipping of obstruents arises in the second mode of spreading, a type of vowel harmony. The analysis attributes the obligatory nasalisation of sonorant consonants when harmony is the nucleus-to-nucleus type to an independent principle of Syllable Nasalisation, which is necessarily in effect when Nasal is a syllabic feature.

[1]  Paul Kiparsky,et al.  Some consequences of Lexical Phonology , 1985, Phonology Yearbook.

[2]  G. L. Piggott A Parametric Approach to Nasal Harmony , 1988 .

[3]  Julie Levin A metrical theory of syllabicity , 1985 .

[4]  John M. Anderson,et al.  Principles of Dependency Phonology , 1987 .

[5]  H. Ellis ms , 1998, The Lancet.

[6]  G. Clements Vowel and Consonant Disharmony in Turkish , 1982 .

[7]  Damian G. Sohl,et al.  Ponapean Reference Grammar , 1981 .

[8]  A. P. Omamor A phonological Sketch of Isekiri , 1979 .

[9]  G. L. Piggott,et al.  Variability in feature dependency: The case of nasality , 1992 .

[10]  Alan Prince,et al.  Prosodic morphology : constraint interaction and satisfaction , 1993 .

[11]  Doug Pulleyblank,et al.  Patterns of Feature Cooccurrence: The Case of Nasality , 1989 .

[12]  Charles Kisseberth,et al.  An Optimal Domains Theory of Harmony , 1994 .

[13]  Douglas Pulleyblank,et al.  Neutral Vowels in Optimality Theory: A Comparison of Yoruba and Wolof , 1996, Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique.

[14]  B. H. Humbert,et al.  PHONOLOGICAL SEGMENTS. THEIR STRUCTURE AND BEHAVIOUR , 1995 .

[15]  Harry van der Hulst,et al.  On Neutral Vowels , 1986 .

[16]  Ludo Verhoeven,et al.  Turkish linguistics today , 1994 .

[17]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .

[18]  Ursula Wiesemann,et al.  Die phonologische und grammatische Struktur der Kaingáng Sprache , 1972 .

[19]  Harry van der Hulst,et al.  The Geometry of Vocalic Features , 1988 .

[20]  RICHARD SMITH,et al.  SOUTHERN BARASANO PHONEMICS , 1971 .

[21]  S. Anderson Nasal Consonants and the Internal Structure of Segments , 1976 .

[22]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Prosodic circumscription in Choctaw morphology , 1991, Phonology.

[23]  Charles Kisseberth,et al.  Nasal Harmony in Optimal Domains Theory , 1994 .

[24]  Keren Rice,et al.  A reexamination of the feature [sonorant]: the status of sonorant obstruents' , 1993 .

[25]  Douglas Pulleyblank,et al.  Vocalic underspecification in Yoruba , 1988 .

[26]  W. E. Welmers African Language Structures , 1974 .

[27]  Harry van der Hulst,et al.  Features, Segmental Structure and Harmony Processes , 1984 .

[28]  Jaye Padgett,et al.  Stricture and nasal place assimilation , 1994 .

[29]  Harry van der Hulst,et al.  The Structure of phonological representations , 1982 .