Collaborative representations: supporting face to face and online knowledge-building discourse

The present widespread interest in the use of electronic media for learning presents an unprecedented opportunity for leveraging the computational medium's strengths for learning. However, existing software tools provide only primitive support for online knowledge-building discourse. Further work is needed in supporting coordinated use of disciplinary representations, discourse representations, and knowledge representations. The paper introduces the concept of representational guidance for discourse along with results of an initial study of this phenomenon in face to face situations. The paper then considers the requirements for supporting asynchronous online knowledge-building discourse, finding existing computer mediated communication tools to be particularly deficient in supporting artifact-centered discourse. A solution is proposed that coordinates discourse representations with disciplinary and knowledge representations.

[1]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Representational support for collaborative inquiry , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[2]  D. Suthers,et al.  Mapping to know: The effects of evidence maps and reflective assessment on scientific inquiry skills. , 2002 .

[3]  Kristine Nagel,et al.  Intra-group and intergroup: an exploration of learning with complementary collaboration tools , 1997, CSCL.

[4]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[5]  Thomas M. Duffy,et al.  Using asynchronous conferencing to promote critical thinking: two implementations in higher education , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[6]  Kristine Nagel,et al.  Integrating and guiding collaboration: lessons learned in computer-supported collaborative learning research at Georgia Tech , 1997, CSCL.

[7]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Towards a Systematic Study of Representational Guidance for Collaborative Learing Discourse , 2001, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[8]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[9]  Patricia G. Wojahn,et al.  Effects of interfaces for annotation on communication in a collaborative task , 1998, CHI.

[10]  Roger King,et al.  Computer-Aided Reasoned Discourse or, How to Argue with a Computer ; CU-CS-358-87 , 2013 .

[11]  Jim Hewitt.  Beyond Threaded Discourse , 2001 .

[12]  Philip M. Johnson,et al.  Experiences with CLARE: a computer-supported collaborative learning environment , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[13]  Christopher M. Hoadley,et al.  The Multimedia Forum Kiosk and SpeakEasy , 1995, MULTIMEDIA '95.

[14]  Philip Bell,et al.  Using argument representations to make thinking visible for individuals and groups , 1997, CSCL.

[15]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[16]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Representational Guidance for Collaborative Learning. , 2003 .

[17]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Higher Levels of Agency for Children in Knowledge Building: A Challenge for the Design of New Knowledge Media , 1991 .

[18]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Design Principles for Distributed Knowledge Building Processes , 1998 .

[19]  Christopher M. Hoadley,et al.  Between information and communication: middle spaces in computer media for learning , 1999, CSCL.

[20]  R. Slavin.  Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice , 1990 .

[21]  A. Collins,et al.  Epistemic forms and Epistemic Games: Structures and Strategies to Guide Inquiry , 1993 .

[22]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[23]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  An integrated approach to implementing collaborative inquiry in the classroom , 1997, CSCL.

[24]  H. Simon,et al.  What makes some problems really hard: Explorations in the problem space of difficulty , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  Jon Oberlander,et al.  A Cognitive Theory of Graphical and Linguistic Reasoning: Logic and Implementation , 1995, Cogn. Sci..

[26]  Jiajie Zhang,et al.  The Nature of External Representations in Problem Solving , 1997, Cogn. Sci..

[27]  L. R. Novick,et al.  Transferring symbolic representations across nonisomorphic problems. , 1994 .

[28]  Michael Bieber,et al.  Collaborative Discourse Structures in Computer Mediated Group Communications , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[29]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Educational Applications of a Networked Communal Database , 1992, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[30]  James R. Layton,et al.  No Significant Difference Phenomenon , 1999, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[31]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Information ecology of collaborations in educational settings: influence of tool , 1997, CSCL.

[32]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 1991 .

[33]  Carol L. Smith,et al.  Conceptually enhanced simulations: A computer tool for science teaching , 1993 .

[34]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Guided discovery in a community of learners. , 1994 .

[35]  P. Bordia.  Face-to-Face Versus Computer-Mediated Communication: A Synthesis of the Experimental Literature , 1997 .

[36]  J. Novak.  Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education , 1990 .

[37]  Jim Hewitt.  Design Principles for the Support of Distributed Processes , 1996 .

[38]  Daniel P. Huttenlocher,et al.  Shared annotation for cooperative learning , 1995, CSCL.

[39]  J. Roschelle.  Designing for cognitive communication: epistemic fidelity or mediating collaborative inquiry? , 1997, Computers, Communication and Mental Models.

[40]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Group processes in the classroom. , 1996 .

[41]  David N. Perkins,et al.  Software Goes to School: Teaching for Understanding with New Technologies. , 1997 .