A randomized controlled trial of fluorouracil plus leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combinations in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE Three agents with differing mechanisms of action are available for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin. In this study, we compared the activity and toxicity of three different two-drug combinations in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who had not been treated previously for advanced disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were concurrently randomly assigned to receive irinotecan and bolus fluorouracil plus leucovorin (IFL, control combination), oxaliplatin and infused fluorouracil plus leucovorin (FOLFOX), or irinotecan and oxaliplatin (IROX). The primary end point was time to progression, with secondary end points of response rate, survival time, and toxicity. RESULTS A total of 795 patients were randomly assigned between May 1999 and April 2001. A median time to progression of 8.7 months, response rate of 45%, and median survival time of 19.5 months were observed for FOLFOX. These results were significantly superior to those observed for IFL for all end points (6.9 months, 31%, and 15.0 months, respectively) or for IROX (6.5 months, 35%, and 17.4 months, respectively) for time to progression and response. The FOLFOX regimen had significantly lower rates of severe nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, febrile neutropenia, and dehydration. Sensory neuropathy and neutropenia were more common with the regimens containing oxaliplatin. CONCLUSION The FOLFOX regimen of oxaliplatin and infused fluorouracil plus leucovorin was active and comparatively safe. It should be considered as a standard therapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

[1]  D. Sargent,et al.  Recommendation for caution with irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for colorectal cancer. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  F. Goldwasser,et al.  Combination of oxaliplatin plus irinotecan in patients with gastrointestinal tumors: results of two independent phase I studies with pharmacokinetics. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  J. Berlin,et al.  Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  R. Hertzberg,et al.  Camptothecin induces protein-linked DNA breaks via mammalian DNA topoisomerase I. , 1985, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[5]  P. Piedbois Modulation of fluorouracil by leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: evidence in terms of response rate. Advanced Colorectal Cancer Meta-Analysis Project. , 1992, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  Christian Jacques,et al.  Randomised trial of irinotecan plus supportive care versus supportive care alone after fluorouracil failure for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer , 1998, The Lancet.

[7]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[8]  P. Rougier,et al.  Randomized trial comparing monthly low-dose leucovorin and fluorouracil bolus with bimonthly high-dose leucovorin and fluorouracil bolus plus continuous infusion for advanced colorectal cancer: a French intergroup study. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  W. Scheithauer,et al.  Combined irinotecan and oxaliplatin plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with advanced fluoropyrimidine/leucovorin-pretreated colorectal cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  C. Wilson,et al.  Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  F. Lévi,et al.  Phase III multicenter randomized trial of oxaliplatin added to chronomodulated fluorouracil-leucovorin as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  J. Bertino,et al.  Fluorouracil in colorectal cancer--a tale of two drugs: implications for biochemical modulation. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  P. O'Brien,et al.  A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. , 1979, Biometrics.

[14]  M. Buyse,et al.  Efficacy of intravenous continuous infusion of fluorouracil compared with bolus administration in advanced colorectal cancer. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  L. Saltz,et al.  Irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan Study Group. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  C. Napier,et al.  Sequence- and region-specificity of oxaliplatin adducts in naked and cellular DNA. , 1998, Molecular pharmacology.

[17]  D. Cox Regression Models and Life-Tables , 1972 .

[18]  K. Paull,et al.  Oxaliplatin, tetraplatin, cisplatin, and carboplatin: spectrum of activity in drug-resistant cell lines and in the cell lines of the National Cancer Institute's Anticancer Drug Screen panel. , 1996, Biochemical pharmacology.

[19]  R. Labianca,et al.  Randomised trial of irinotecan versus fluorouracil by continuous infusion after fluorouracil failure in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer , 1998, The Lancet.

[20]  R. James,et al.  Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial , 2000, The Lancet.

[21]  Ahmedin Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2002 , 2002, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.