Error-Related EEG Potentials Generated During Simulated Brain–Computer Interaction

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are prone to errors in the recognition of subject's intent. An elegant approach to improve the accuracy of BCIs consists in a verification procedure directly based on the presence of error-related potentials (ErrP) in the electroencephalogram (EEG) recorded right after the occurrence of an error. Several studies show the presence of ErrP in typical choice reaction tasks. However, in the context of a BCI, the central question is: ldquoAre ErrP also elicited when the error is made by the interface during the recognition of the subject's intent?rdquo We have thus explored whether ErrP also follow a feedback indicating incorrect responses of the simulated BCI interface. Five healthy volunteer subjects participated in a new human-robot interaction experiment, which seem to confirm the previously reported presence of a new kind of ErrP. However, in order to exploit these ErrP, we need to detect them in each single trial using a short window following the feedback associated to the response of the BCI. We have achieved an average recognition rate of correct and erroneous single trials of 83.5% and 79.2%, respectively, using a classifier built with data recorded up to three months earlier.

[1]  D. Meyer,et al.  A Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1993 .

[2]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. , 1998, Science.

[3]  G Pfurtscheller,et al.  EEG-based communication: improved accuracy by response verification. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  EEG-based communication: presence of an error potential , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: a tutorial , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[6]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Error-related brain potentials are differentially related to awareness of response errors: evidence from an antisaccade task. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[7]  Febo Cincotti,et al.  Relevant EEG features for the classification of spontaneous motor-related tasks , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[8]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. , 2002, Psychological review.

[9]  R D Pascual-Marqui,et al.  Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. , 2002, Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology.

[10]  K.-R. Muller,et al.  Boosting bit rates and error detection for the classification of fast-paced motor commands based on single-trial EEG analysis , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[11]  P. Sajda,et al.  Response error correction-a demonstration of improved human-machine performance using real-time EEG monitoring , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[12]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Modulation of activity in medial frontal and motor cortices during error observation , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  D. V. von Cramon,et al.  Neural correlates of error detection and error correction: is there a common neuroanatomical substrate? , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[14]  F. Babiloni,et al.  Estimation of the cortical functional connectivity with the multimodal integration of high-resolution EEG and fMRI data by directed transfer function , 2005, NeuroImage.

[15]  José del R. Millán,et al.  You Are Wrong! - Automatic Detection of Interaction Errors from Brain Waves , 2005, IJCAI.

[16]  A. Buttfield,et al.  Towards a robust BCI: error potentials and online learning , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[17]  P. Rossini,et al.  High-resolution electro-encephalogram: source estimates of Laplacian-transformed somatosensory-evoked potentials using a realistic subject head model constructed from magnetic resonance images , 2000, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.