Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities

Moral agency is manifested in both the power to refrain from behaving inhumanely and the proactive power to behave humanely. Moral agency is embedded in a broader sociocognitive self theory encompassing self-organizing, proactive, self-reflective, and self-regulatory mechanisms rooted in personal standards linked to self-sanctions. The self-regulatory mechanisms governing moral conduct do not come into play unless they are activated, and there are many psychosocial maneuvers by which moral self-sanctions are selectively disengaged from inhumane conduct. The moral disengagement may center on the cognitive restructuring of inhumane conduct into a benign or worthy one by moral justification, sanitizing language, and advantageous comparison; disavowal of a sense of personal agency by diffusion or displacement of responsibility; disregarding or minimizing the injurious effects of one 's actions; and attribution of blame to, and dehumanization of those who are victimized. Many inhumanities operate through a supportive network of legitimate enterprises run by otherwise considerate people who contribute to destructive activities by disconnected subdivision of functions and diffusion of responsibility. Given the many mechanisms for disengaging moral control, civilized life requires, in addition to humane personal standards, safeguards built into social systems that uphold compassionate behavior and renounce cruelty.

[1]  S. Kelder,et al.  Promoting tolerance and moral engagement through peer modeling. , 2000, Cultural diversity & ethnic minority psychology.

[2]  G. Awad.  Origins of Terrorism: Psychologies, Ideologies, Theologies, States of Mind. , 2000 .

[3]  T. Diaz.  Making a Killing: The Business of Guns in America , 1999 .

[4]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[5]  W. Reich.  Origins of Terrorism: Psychologies, Ideologies, Theologies, States of Mind , 1998 .

[6]  C. Haney.  Violence and the capital jury: Mechanisms of moral disengagement and the impulse to condemn to , 1997 .

[7]  Laura L. O'Toole,et al.  Gender violence: Interdisciplinary perspectives. , 1997 .

[8]  D. Goldhagen.  Hitler's willing executioners : ordinary Germans and the Holocaust , 1996 .

[9]  A. Bandura,et al.  Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement in the Exercise of Moral Agency , 1996 .

[10]  P. Zimbardo.  The Psychology of Evil : A Situationist Perspective on Recruiting Good People to Engage in Anti-Social Acts , 1995 .

[11]  Dov Cohen,et al.  Self-Protection and the Culture of Honor: Explaining Southern Violence , 1994 .

[12]  T. Gabor.  Everybody Does It!: Crime by the Public , 1994 .

[13]  P. Blackman.  Actual causes of death in the United States. , 1994, JAMA.

[14]  R. Bonnie,et al.  Growing up Tobacco Free: Preventing Nicotine Addiction in Children and Youths , 1994 .

[15]  McGinnis Jm,et al.  Actual causes of death in the United States. , 1993 .

[16]  A. Bandura.  Social cognitive theory of social referencing. , 1992 .

[17]  S. Feinman.  Social Referencing and the Social Construction of Reality in Infancy , 1992 .

[18]  R. Enright,et al.  Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development , 1991 .

[19]  A. Bandura.  Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. , 1991 .

[20]  H. Kelman,et al.  Crimes of obedience: Toward a social psychology of authority and responsibility. , 1990 .

[21]  David C. Rapoport,et al.  The Morality of Terrorism: Religious and Secular Justifications , 1989 .

[22]  M. Kramer.  The moral logic of Hizballah , 1987 .

[23]  Primo Levi.  The Drowned and the Saved , 1986 .

[24]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[25]  I. Charny.  The morality of terrorism: Religious and secular justifications, by David C. Rapaport and Yonah Alexander. Pergamon, New York, 1982, $35.00 , 1985 .

[26]  J. P. Rushton,et al.  The Altruistic Personality , 1984 .

[27]  Craig A. Smith,et al.  The structure of self-reports of emotional responses to film segments , 1982 .

[28]  James G. March,et al.  Theories of choice and making decisions , 1982 .

[29]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Book Review Nisbett, R. , & Ross, L.Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1980. , 1982 .

[30]  P. R. Sanday.  The socio-cultural context of rape: A cross-cultural study. , 1981 .

[31]  T. Gilovich,et al.  Seeing the past in the present: The effect of associations to familiar events on judgments and decisions. , 1981 .

[32]  L. Ross,et al.  Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. , 1981 .

[33]  R. Ivie.  Images of Savagery in American Justifications for War. , 1980 .

[34]  Martha R. Burt,et al.  Cultural myths and supports for rape. , 1980, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  D. Bolinger.  Language – The Loaded Weapon , 1980 .

[36]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. , 1978 .

[37]  The Powerholders , 1977 .

[38]  E. Diener.  Deindividuation: Causes and Consequences. , 1977 .

[39]  A. Bandura,et al.  Disinhibition of aggression through diffusion of responsibility and dehumanization of victims , 1975 .

[40]  A. L. Beaman,et al.  Effects of altered responsibility, congnitive set, and modeling on physical aggression and deindividuation. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  S. Milgram.  Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View , 1975 .

[42]  W. Kilham,et al.  Level of destructive obedience as a function of transmitter and executant roles in the Milgram obedience paradigm. , 1974, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  Herbert G. Kelman.  Violence without Moral Restraint: Reflections on the Dehumanization of Victims and Victimizers , 1973 .

[44]  P. Zimbardo,et al.  Interpersonal Dynamics in a Simulated Prison , 1972 .

[45]  A. Bandura.  Aggression: a social learning analysis , 1971 .

[46]  Gillespie Wh.  Aggression and instinct theory. , 1971 .

[47]  W. Gillespie.  Aggression and instinct theory. , 1971, The International journal of psycho-analysis.

[48]  H. Tilker.  Socially responsible behavior as a function of observer responsibility and victim feedback. , 1970 .