Simulation-Based Inference Methods for Particle Physics
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] S. S. Wilks. The Large-Sample Distribution of the Likelihood Ratio for Testing Composite Hypotheses , 1938 .
[2] A. Wald. Tests of statistical hypotheses concerning several parameters when the number of observations is large , 1943 .
[3] Matts Roos,et al. MINUIT-a system for function minimization and analysis of the parameter errors and correlations , 1984 .
[4] P. Diggle,et al. Monte Carlo Methods of Inference for Implicit Statistical Models , 1984 .
[5] D. Rubin. Bayesianly Justifiable and Relevant Frequency Calculations for the Applied Statistician , 1984 .
[6] K. Kondo. Dynamical Likelihood Method for Reconstruction of Events with Missing Momentum. I. Method and Toy Models , 1988 .
[7] Soni,et al. Analysis for magnetic moment and electric dipole moment form factors of the top quark via e+e--->tt-bar. , 1992, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.
[8] M. Davier,et al. The optimal method for the measurement of tau polarization , 1993 .
[9] K. Kondo,et al. Dynamical Likelihood Method for Reconstruction of Events with Missing Momentum. III. Analysis of a CDF High P T eµ Event as t\bar t Production , 1993 .
[10] M. Diehl,et al. Optimal observables for the measurement of three gauge boson couplings ine+e−→W+W− , 1994 .
[11] L. Holmström,et al. A new multivariate technique for top quark search , 1995 .
[12] Kyle S. Cranmer. Kernel estimation in high-energy physics , 2000 .
[13] S. Moretti,et al. HERWIG 6: an event generator for hadron emission reactions with interfering gluons (including supersymmetric processes) , 2001 .
[14] D. Balding,et al. Approximate Bayesian computation in population genetics. , 2002, Genetics.
[15] A. Dell'Acqua,et al. Geant4 - A simulation toolkit , 2003 .
[16] K. Bos,et al. A precision measurement of the mass of the top quark , 2004 .
[17] F. Siegert,et al. Event generation with SHERPA 1.1 , 2008, 0811.4622.
[18] George Michailidis,et al. Sequential Experiment Design for Contour Estimation From Complex Computer Codes , 2008, Technometrics.
[19] Radford M Neal. Computing Likelihood Functions for High-Energy Physics Experiments when Distributions are Defined by Simulators with Nuisance Parameters , 2008 .
[20] O. Mattelaer,et al. MadWeight: automatic event reweighting with matrix elements , 2009 .
[21] Alfio Lazzaro,et al. The RooStats Project , 2010, 1009.1003.
[22] N. Tran,et al. Spin determination of single-produced resonances at hadron colliders , 2010, 1001.3396.
[23] A. Barr,et al. A review of the mass measurement techniques proposed for the Large Hadron Collider , 2010, 1004.2732.
[24] K. Cranmer,et al. Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics , 2010, 1007.1727.
[25] O. Mattelaer,et al. The Matrix Element Method and QCD Radiation , 2010, 1010.2263.
[26] Noah D. Goodman,et al. Lightweight Implementations of Probabilistic Programming Languages Via Transformational Compilation , 2011, AISTATS.
[27] D. Soper,et al. Finding physics signals with shower deconstruction , 2011, 1102.3480.
[28] Ling Li,et al. Sequential design of computer experiments for the estimation of a probability of failure , 2010, Statistics and Computing.
[29] K. Cranmer,et al. HistFactory: A tool for creating statistical models for use with RooFit and RooStats , 2012 .
[30] W. Marsden. I and J , 2012 .
[31] N. Tran,et al. Spin and parity of a single-produced resonance at the LHC , 2012, 1208.4018.
[32] D. J. Nott,et al. Approximate Bayesian computation via regression density estimation , 2012, 1212.1479.
[33] F. Maltoni,et al. Unravelling tth via the matrix element method. , 2013, Physical review letters.
[34] A. Korytov,et al. Precision studies of the Higgs boson decay channel H ! ZZ ! 4ℓ with MEKD , 2012, 1210.0896.
[35] J. Lykken,et al. The Matrix Element Method: Past, Present, and Future , 2013, 1307.3546.
[36] D. Soper,et al. Finding top quarks with shower deconstruction , 2012, 1211.3140.
[37] J. Campbell,et al. Finding the Higgs boson in decays to $Z \gamma$ using the matrix element method at Next-to-Leading Order , 2013, 1301.7086.
[38] C. Englert,et al. Extracting precise Higgs couplings by using the matrix element method , 2013 .
[39] Kyle Cranmer,et al. Practical Statistics for the LHC , 2014, 1503.07622.
[40] Frank D. Wood,et al. A New Approach to Probabilistic Programming Inference , 2014, AISTATS.
[41] D. Soper,et al. Finding physics signals with event deconstruction , 2014, 1402.1189.
[42] R. Frederix,et al. The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations , 2014, 1405.0301.
[43] M. Gutmann,et al. Statistical Inference of Intractable Generative Models via Classification , 2014 .
[44] D. Schouten,et al. Accelerated matrix element method with parallel computing , 2014, Comput. Phys. Commun..
[45] Shakir Mohamed,et al. Variational Inference with Normalizing Flows , 2015, ICML.
[46] Peter Skands,et al. An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2 , 2014, Comput. Phys. Commun..
[47] P. Uwer,et al. Extending the Matrix Element Method beyond the Born approximation: calculating event weights at next-to-leading order accuracy , 2015, 1506.08798.
[48] Gilles Louppe,et al. Approximating Likelihood Ratios with Calibrated Discriminative Classifiers , 2015, 1506.02169.
[49] Gilles Louppe,et al. Carl: a Likelihood-free Inference Toolbox , 2016, J. Open Source Softw..
[50] Karsten Koeneke,et al. A morphing technique for signal modelling in a multidimensional space of coupling parameters , 2016 .
[51] Shakir Mohamed,et al. Learning in Implicit Generative Models , 2016, ArXiv.
[52] Gilles Louppe,et al. Unifying generative models and exact likelihood-free inference with conditional bijections , 2016 .
[53] Pierre Baldi,et al. Parameterized neural networks for high-energy physics , 2016, The European Physical Journal C.
[54] M. Xiao,et al. Constraining anomalous Higgs boson couplings to the heavy flavor fermions using matrix element techniques , 2016, 1606.03107.
[55] C. Englert,et al. Measuring the Higgs-bottom coupling in weak boson fusion , 2015, 1512.03429.
[56] Cranmer Kyle. NIPS 2016 Keynote: Machine Learning & Likelihood Free Inference in Particle Physics , 2016 .
[57] P. Uwer,et al. The Matrix Element Method at next-to-leading order QCD for hadronic collisions: single top-quark production at the LHC as an example application , 2017, 1712.04527.
[58] Gorjan Alagic,et al. #p , 2019, Quantum information & computation.
[59] K. Cranmer,et al. Better Higgs boson measurements through information geometry , 2016, 1612.05261.
[60] C. Rogan,et al. Sparticles in motion: Analyzing compressed SUSY scenarios with a new method of event reconstruction , 2017 .
[61] B. Wandelt,et al. Generalized massive optimal data compression , 2017, 1712.00012.
[62] Gilles Louppe,et al. Learning to Pivot with Adversarial Networks , 2016, NIPS.
[63] Gilles Louppe,et al. Likelihood-free inference with an improved cross-entropy estimator , 2018, ArXiv.
[64] Gilles Louppe,et al. Constraining Effective Field Theories with Machine Learning. , 2018, Physical review letters.
[65] Jakob H. Macke,et al. Likelihood-free inference with emulator networks , 2018, AABI.
[66] Gilles Louppe,et al. A guide to constraining effective field theories with machine learning , 2018, Physical Review D.
[67] J. Brehmer,et al. Better Higgs-CP Tests Through Information Geometry , 2017, 1712.02350.
[68] Ritabrata Dutta,et al. Likelihood-free inference via classification , 2014, Stat. Comput..
[69] Michael U. Gutmann,et al. Dynamic Likelihood-free Inference via Ratio Estimation (DIRE) , 2018, ArXiv.
[70] Benjamin Dan Wandelt,et al. Massive optimal data compression and density estimation for scalable, likelihood-free inference in cosmology , 2018, 1801.01497.
[71] Benjamin Dan Wandelt,et al. Nuisance hardened data compression for fast likelihood-free inference , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[72] Benjamin Nachman,et al. AI Safety for High Energy Physics , 2019, ArXiv.
[73] J. Brehmer,et al. Benchmarking simplified template cross sections in W H production , 2019, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[74] P. Uwer,et al. Matrix element method at NLO for (anti-) kt -jet algorithms , 2019, Physical Review D.
[75] Pablo de Castro,et al. INFERNO: Inference-Aware Neural Optimisation , 2018, Comput. Phys. Commun..
[76] Gilles Louppe,et al. Identifying hadronically-decaying vector bosons and top quarks in ATLAS , 2019, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
[77] Gilles Louppe,et al. Mining for Dark Matter Substructure: Inferring Subhalo Population Properties from Strong Lenses with Machine Learning , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.
[78] Prabhat,et al. Efficient Probabilistic Inference in the Quest for Physics Beyond the Standard Model , 2018, NeurIPS.
[79] Iain Murray,et al. Sequential Neural Likelihood: Fast Likelihood-free Inference with Autoregressive Flows , 2018, AISTATS.
[80] L. Gouskos,et al. The Machine Learning landscape of top taggers , 2019, SciPost Physics.
[81] Prabhat,et al. Etalumis: bringing probabilistic programming to scientific simulators at scale , 2019, SC.
[82] B. Nachman,et al. Simulation assisted likelihood-free anomaly detection , 2020, Physical Review D.
[83] Patrick T. Komiske,et al. OmniFold: A Method to Simultaneously Unfold All Observables. , 2019, Physical review letters.
[84] B. Nachman,et al. Neural networks for full phase-space reweighting and parameter tuning , 2019, Physical Review D.
[85] Iain Murray,et al. On Contrastive Learning for Likelihood-free Inference , 2020, ICML.
[86] Gilles Louppe,et al. Likelihood-free MCMC with Amortized Approximate Ratio Estimators , 2019, ICML.
[87] Ullrich Kothe,et al. Invertible networks or partons to detector and back again , 2020, 2006.06685.
[88] B. Nachman,et al. Anomaly detection with density estimation , 2020, Physical Review D.
[89] David S. Greenberg,et al. SBI - A toolkit for simulation-based inference , 2020, J. Open Source Softw..
[90] Gilles Louppe,et al. The frontier of simulation-based inference , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[91] A. Wulzer,et al. Parametrized classifiers for optimal EFT sensitivity , 2020, Journal of High Energy Physics.
[92] Gilles Louppe,et al. Mining gold from implicit models to improve likelihood-free inference , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[93] K. Cranmer,et al. MadMiner: Machine Learning-Based Inference for Particle Physics , 2019, Computing and Software for Big Science.
[94] D. Whiteson,et al. Resonance Searches with Machine Learned Likelihood Ratios , 2020, 2002.04699.
[95] Eric Nalisnick,et al. Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inference , 2019, J. Mach. Learn. Res..
[96] Jukka Corander,et al. Likelihood-Free Inference by Ratio Estimation , 2016, Bayesian Analysis.