Interpersonal dimensions of community in graduate online learning: Exploring social presence through the lens of Systemic Functional Linguistics

This exploratory case study considers the interpersonal dimension of collaborative learning in an online graduate community that is based on a cohort approach to education which is characterized by the social construction of knowledge. Discourse data from two graduate courses are analyzed for interpersonal elements associated with social presence through the lens of Systemic Functional Linguistics. A general profile of the interpersonal dimension of the learning community is provided along with a consideration of cognitive engagement and the interpersonal dynamics of two dilemmatic situations. Data analyses indicate that social presence is much more than social chat and that the nature of the collaborative learning process is deeply intertwined with interpersonal engagement among participants.

[1]  Meredith D. Gall,et al.  Educational Research: An Introduction , 1965 .

[2]  Karen Swan,et al.  Evaluating online conversation in an asynchronous learning environment: An application of Grice's cooperative principle , 2007, Internet High. Educ..

[3]  Sunyoung Joung,et al.  Scaffolding collaborative argumentation in asynchronous discussions with message constraints and message labels , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[4]  J. Belz Linguistic Perspectives on the Development of Intercultural Competence in Telecollaboration. , 2003 .

[5]  Brent Muirhead,et al.  Enhancing Social Interaction in Computer-Mediated Distance Education , 2000, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[6]  Tim S. Roberts Online Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice , 2003 .

[7]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  The sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environment , 2002, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[8]  C. Tu The relationship between social presence and online privacy , 2002, Internet High. Educ..

[9]  Earl W. Stevick,et al.  Memory, Meaning, & Method: A View of Language Teaching. Second Edition. , 1997 .

[10]  B. Mohan Language and Content , 1985 .

[11]  E. Stevick Teaching Languages: A Way and Ways , 1980 .

[12]  Laura Zieger,et al.  Establishing a Community of Learners: A Case Study of a University Graduate Orientation Program for Online Learners. , 2004 .

[13]  Shlomo Argamon,et al.  Using appraisal groups for sentiment analysis , 2005, CIKM '05.

[14]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[15]  M. Warschauer Computer-Mediated Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice. , 1997 .

[16]  Thomas M. Duffy,et al.  Learner-centered theory and practice in distance education : cases from higher education , 2003 .

[17]  Bernard Mohan,et al.  A systemic functional perspective on native and non-native english speaking students' online discussion in a mixed-mode graduate seminar , 2005 .

[18]  Pearl Chen,et al.  Moments of Joy , 2003 .

[19]  A. P. Rovai A constructivist approach to online college learning , 2004, Internet High. Educ..

[20]  R. Garrison Theoretical Challenges for Distance Education in the 21st Century: A Shift from Structural to Transactional Issues , 2000 .

[21]  Leah P. Macfadyen,et al.  Negotiating Cultures in Cyberspace: Participation Patterns and Problematics , 2004 .

[22]  Michael Halliday,et al.  An Introduction to Functional Grammar , 1985 .

[23]  E. Stevick Adapting And Writing Language Lessons , 1971 .

[24]  Charles B. Hodges Designing to Motivate: Motivational Techniques to Incorporate in E-Learning Experiences , 2004 .

[25]  Ken W. White,et al.  The Online Teaching Guide : A Handbook of Attitudes, Strategies, and Techniques for the Virtual Classroom , 1999 .

[26]  Alfred P. Rovai,et al.  Facilitating online discussions effectively , 2007, Internet High. Educ..

[27]  S. Wade,et al.  Research to Practice Online , 2003 .

[28]  D. Garrison,et al.  Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education , 2001 .

[29]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Computer Learning Networks and Student Empowerment. , 1996 .

[30]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[31]  C. Leung,et al.  English as a second language in the mainstream : teaching, learning, and identity , 2001 .

[32]  Margaret S. Barrett,et al.  Defining learning communities , 2003 .

[33]  A. P. Rovai Development of an instrument to measure classroom community , 2002, Internet High. Educ..

[34]  José Bidarra,et al.  Current Developments and Best Practice in Open and Distance Learning , 2000 .

[35]  Sarah Prestridge,et al.  A networked learning community approach to sustain teacher ICT professional development , 2003 .

[36]  L. Unsworth Researching language in schools and communities : functional linguistic perspectives , 2000 .

[37]  Joseph Luca,et al.  Overcoming "process-blindness" in the design of an online environment: Balancing cognitive and psycho-social outcomes , 2003 .

[38]  Rosalie J. Ocker,et al.  Politeness theory and computer-mediated communication: a sociolinguistic approach to analyzing relational messages , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[39]  Nike Arnold,et al.  Future Foreign Language Teachers' Social and Cognitive Collaboration in an Online Environment , 2006 .

[40]  Martha Cleveland-Innes,et al.  Revisiting methodological issues in transcript analysis: Negotiated coding and reliability , 2006, Internet High. Educ..

[41]  David F. Clarke,et al.  Computer-assisted reading—What can the machine really contribute? , 1986 .

[42]  J. Egbert,et al.  Call Research Perspectives , 2005 .

[43]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative research and case study applications in education , 1998 .

[44]  Allan Jeong,et al.  The Effects of Conversational Language on Group Interaction and Group Performance in Computer-Supported Collaborative Argumentation , 2006 .

[45]  D. Garrison,et al.  Assessing Social Presence In Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing , 1999 .

[46]  Michael Corry,et al.  Building Active Online Interaction via a Collaborative Learning Community , 2003 .

[47]  Michael Halliday Language As Social Semiotic , 1978 .

[48]  C. Tu,et al.  The Relationship of Social Presence and Interaction in Online Classes , 2002 .

[49]  John G. Hedberg,et al.  Ensuring quality E‐Learning: creating engaging tasks , 2003 .

[50]  Shane Dawson,et al.  A study of the relationship between student communication interaction and sense of community , 2006, Internet High. Educ..

[51]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[52]  Sabine Seufert The NetAcademy as a Medium for Learning Communities , 2000, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[53]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[54]  Mary J. Schleppegrell The Language of Schooling: A Functional Linguistics Perspective , 2004 .

[55]  Dianne Bloomfield Voices on the Web: Student teachers negotiating identity , 2000 .

[56]  Karen Swan,et al.  Building Learning Communities in Online Courses: the importance of interaction , 2002 .

[57]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation , 2007, Internet High. Educ..

[58]  Julie A. Belz,et al.  Social Dimensions of Telecollaborative Foreign Language Study , 2002 .

[59]  Karen Littleton,et al.  The negotiation and co‐construction of meaning and understanding within a postgraduate online learning community , 2005 .

[60]  D. Garrison,et al.  Methodological Issues in the Content Analysis of Computer Conference Transcripts , 2007 .

[61]  Janyce Wiebe,et al.  Recognizing Contextual Polarity in Phrase-Level Sentiment Analysis , 2005, HLT.

[62]  Jeannett Martin,et al.  The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English , 2005 .

[63]  D. Garrison,et al.  Facilitating Cognitive Presence in Online Learning: Interaction Is Not Enough , 2005 .