Information Systems Research and Development by Activity Analysis and Development: Dead Horse or the Next Wave?

We argue that the currently dominant methods in Information Systems are not satisfactory for emancipatory research and development whose starting point is work. Activity theory was proposed as such an emancipatory research-cumdevelopment approach in IS a decade ago. However, the potential identified in the theory has not fully materialized. As our own contribution toward making activity theory more operational in IS, we present an elaborated framework, ActAD, and review our experience in applying it to descriptive research, practical analysis, and constructive research. We claim that in order to fully unleash the potential of activity theory, activity-based methods should be developed further for IS requirements analysis projects and IS implementation projects, as well as for facilitating software development. The most appropriate way of developing such applied methods is through collaborative action research in real-life information systems work—the information systems practitioners developing their own work through activity analysis and development, with researcher participation.

[1]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Perspectives on activity theory: Play, learning, and instruction , 1999 .

[2]  Steven L. Alter,et al.  The Work System Method for Understanding Information Systems and Information Systems Research , 2002, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Introduction: Information Technology in Human Activity , 2000, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[4]  A. Adam.  Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[5]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[6]  Mikko Korpela,et al.  Information Systems Research and Information Systems Practice in a Network of Activities , 2002, Social Thinking - Software Practice.

[7]  Mikko Korpela,et al.  Activity Analysis as a Method for Information Systems Development: General Introduction and Experiments from Nigeria and Finland , 2000, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Mikko Korpela,et al.  Two Times Four Integrative Levels of Analysis: A Framework , 2001, Realigning Research and Practice in Information Systems Development.

[9]  Jakob E. Bardram,et al.  Temporal Coordination –On Time and Coordination of CollaborativeActivities at a Surgical Department , 2000, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[10]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers , 1994, CACM.

[11]  Finn Kensing,et al.  Participatory Design: Issues and Concerns , 2004, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[12]  K. Lyytinen,et al.  Research on information systems development in Scandinavia—unity in plurality , 1998 .

[13]  Seth Chaiklin,et al.  Activity Theory and Social Practice Cultural-Historical Approaches , 1999 .

[14]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Investigating Information Systems with Ethnographic Research , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Yvonne Dittrich,et al.  Social Thinking - Software Practice , 2002, Social Thinking - Software Practice.

[16]  Daisy Mwanza,et al.  Towards an activity-oriented design method for HCI research and practice , 2002 .

[17]  G. Walsham.  Actor-network theory and IS research: current status and future prospects , 1997 .

[18]  Mikko Korpela,et al.  Information Systems Development as an Activity , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[19]  Susanne Bødker.  Activity Theory as a Challenge to Systems Design , 1990 .

[20]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Activity theory and individual and social transformation. , 1999 .

[21]  Allen S. Lee,et al.  Information systems and qualitative research , 1997 .

[22]  Mario Bunge,et al.  Consciousness and Personality , 1980 .

[23]  David F. Redmiles,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue on Activity Theory and the Practice of Design , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[24]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Structuration Theory and Information Systems Research , 1990, ICIS.

[25]  Steven L. Alter.  A General, Yet Useful Theory of Information Systems , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[26]  H. Klein,et al.  Information systems research: contemporary approaches and emergent traditions , 1991 .

[27]  Kendall Scott,et al.  UML distilled - a brief guide to the Standard Object Modeling Language (2. ed.) , 2000, notThenot Addison-Wesley object technology series.

[28]  Suzanne Robertson,et al.  Mastering the Requirements Process , 1999 .

[29]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Proceedings of the IFIP TC8/WG8.2 Working Conference on Realigning Research and Practice in Information Systems Development: The Social and Organizational Perspective , 2001 .

[30]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[31]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[32]  Steven L. Alter.  Which Life Cycle - Work System, Information System, or Software? , 2001, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Computers in Mediated Human Activity , 1997 .