A phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of AMG 102 (rilotumumab) in patients with recurrent glioblastoma

This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of AMG 102 (rilotumumab), a fully human monoclonal antibody against hepatocyte growth factor / scatter factor (HGF / SF), in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). Patients with histologically confirmed, measurable recurrent GBM or gliosarcoma (World Health Organization grade 4) and ≤ 3 relapses or prior systemic therapies received AMG 102 (10 or 20 mg / kg) by infusion every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was best confirmed objective response rate (central assessment) per Macdonald criteria. Of the 61 patients who enrolled, 60 received AMG 102. Twenty-nine patients (48%) had previously received bevacizumab. There were no objective responses per central assessment, but 1 patient had an objective response per investigator assessment. Median overall survival (95% CI) in the 10- and 20-mg / kg cohorts was 6.5 months (4.1–9.8) and 5.4 months (3.4–11.4), respectively, and pro-gression-free survival (PFS) per central assessment was 4.1 weeks (4.0–4.1) and 4.3 weeks (4.1–8.1), respect-ively. PFS was similar among patients who had previously received bevacizumab compared with bevacizumab-naive patients. The most common adverse events were fatigue (38%), headache (33%), and peripheral edema (23%). AMG 102 serum concentrations increased approximately dose-proportionally with 2-fold accumulation at steady state. Plasma total HGF / SF and soluble c-Met concentrations increased 12.05- and 1.12-fold, respectively, from baseline during AMG 102 treatment. AMG 102 monotherapy at doses up to 20 mg / kg was not associated with significant antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent GBM.

[1]  G. Shapiro,et al.  A Phase I Study of Foretinib, a Multi-Targeted Inhibitor of c-Met and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2 , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[2]  Tracy T Batchelor,et al.  Bevacizumab salvage therapy following progression in high-grade glioma patients treated with VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. , 2010, Neuro-oncology.

[3]  Dorothy J. Park,et al.  A Phase Ib Study of AMG 102 in Combination with Bevacizumab or Motesanib in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[4]  A. Coxon,et al.  Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of AMG 102, a Fully Human Hepatocyte Growth Factor–Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibody, in a First-in-Human Study of Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[5]  O. Arrieta,et al.  Hepatocyte growth factor in cerebrospinal fluid is associated with mortality and recurrence of glioblastoma, and could be of prognostic value , 2010, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[6]  P. Wen,et al.  Treatment of recurrent high-grade gliomas , 2009, Current opinion in neurology.

[7]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  P. Wen,et al.  Role of a second chemotherapy in recurrent malignant glioma patients who progress on bevacizumab. , 2009, Neuro-oncology.

[9]  M. Pomper,et al.  EGFRvIII and c-Met pathway inhibitors synergize against PTEN-null/EGFRvIII+ glioblastoma xenografts , 2009, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[10]  Tracy T Batchelor,et al.  Angiogenesis as a therapeutic target in malignant gliomas. , 2009, The oncologist.

[11]  A. Mahadevan,et al.  Adult gliosarcoma: epidemiology, natural history, and factors associated with outcome. , 2009, Neuro-oncology.

[12]  M. J. van den Bent,et al.  Randomized phase II trial of erlotinib versus temozolomide or carmustine in recurrent glioblastoma: EORTC brain tumor group study 26034. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  John A Butman,et al.  Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblastoma. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  Do-Hyun Nam,et al.  Prognostic significance of c‐Met expression in glioblastomas , 2009, Cancer.

[15]  Caterina Giannini,et al.  Phase I/II trial of erlotinib and temozolomide with radiation therapy in the treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study N0177. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  Santosh Kesari,et al.  Malignant gliomas in adults. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  T. Yap,et al.  Phase I trial to determine the dose range for the c-Met inhibitor ARQ 197 that inhibits c-Met and FAK phosphorylation, when administered by an oral twice-a-day schedule , 2008 .

[18]  Dieta Brandsma,et al.  Clinical features, mechanisms, and management of pseudoprogression in malignant gliomas. , 2008, The Lancet. Oncology.

[19]  R. Reis,et al.  Analysis of EGFR overexpression, EGFR gene amplification and the EGFRvIII mutation in Portuguese high-grade gliomas. , 2008, Anticancer research.

[20]  S. Horvath,et al.  Development of a Real-time RT-PCR Assay for Detecting EGFRvIII in Glioblastoma Samples , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[21]  K. Rex,et al.  AMG 102, A Fully Human Anti-Hepatocyte Growth Factor/Scatter Factor Neutralizing Antibody, Enhances the Efficacy of Temozolomide or Docetaxel in U-87 MG Cells and Xenografts , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[22]  Keith L. Ligon,et al.  Coactivation of Receptor Tyrosine Kinases Affects the Response of Tumor Cells to Targeted Therapies , 2007, Science.

[23]  Andrew E. Sloan,et al.  Early necrosis following concurrent Temodar and radiotherapy in patients with glioblastoma , 2007, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[24]  M. Westphal,et al.  A Novel One-Armed Anti-c-Met Antibody Inhibits Glioblastoma Growth In vivo , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[25]  J. Laterra,et al.  Systemic anti-hepatocyte growth factor monoclonal antibody therapy induces the regression of intracranial glioma xenografts. , 2006, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[26]  Jilin Sun,et al.  Fully human monoclonal antibodies to hepatocyte growth factor with therapeutic potential against hepatocyte growth factor/c-Met-dependent human tumors. , 2006, Cancer research.

[27]  Martin J. van den Bent,et al.  Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  David J. Yang,et al.  Prognostic Effect of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and EGFRvIII in Glioblastoma Multiforme Patients , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[29]  J. Laterra,et al.  Targeting the c-Met pathway potentiates glioblastoma responses to gamma-radiation. , 2005, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[30]  R. Ondarza,et al.  Hepatocyte growth factor is associated with poor prognosis of malignant gliomas and is a predictor for recurrence of meningioma , 2002, Cancer.

[31]  B. Davidson,et al.  The FASEB Journal express article 10.1096/fj.01-0421fje. Published online November 29, 2001. , 2022 .

[32]  G. V. Vande Woude,et al.  Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies to hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF) display antitumor activity in animal models , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  J. Williams,et al.  Scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor protects against cytotoxic death in human glioblastoma via phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase- and AKT-dependent pathways. , 2000, Cancer research.

[34]  E. Hudson,et al.  Met and hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor expression in human gliomas. , 1997, Cancer research.

[35]  H. Tsubouchi,et al.  Effects of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) on human glioma cells in vitro: HGF acts as a motility factor in glioma cells , 1996, International journal of cancer.

[36]  J. Parisi,et al.  The trends in incidence of primary brain tumors in the population of rochester, minnesota , 1995, Annals of neurology.

[37]  T. Cascino,et al.  Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[38]  E. S. Pearson,et al.  THE USE OF CONFIDENCE OR FIDUCIAL LIMITS ILLUSTRATED IN THE CASE OF THE BINOMIAL , 1934 .