A MS-SSIM Optimal JPEG 2000 Encoder

In this work, we present a SSIM optimal JPEG 2000 rate allocation algorithm. However, our aim is less improving the visual performance of JPEG 2000, but more the study of the performance of the SSIM full reference metric by means beyond correlation measurements.Full reference image quality metrics assign a quality index to a pair of a reference and distorted image. The performance of a metric is then measured by the degree of correlation between the scores obtained from the metric and those from subjective tests. It is the aim of a rate allocation algorithm to minimize the distortion created by a lossy image compression scheme under a rate constraint.Noting this relation between objective function and performance evaluation allows us now to define an alternative approach to evaluate the usefulness of a candidate metric: we want to judge the quality of a metric by its ability to define an objective function for rate control purposes, and evaluate images compressed in this scheme subjectively. It turns out that deficiencies of image quality metrics become much easier visible --- even in the literal sense --- than under traditional correlation experiments.Our candidate metric in this work is the SSIM index proposed by Sheik and Bovik which is both simple enough to be implemented efficiently in rate control algorithms, but yet correlates better to visual quality than MSE; our candidate compression scheme is the highly flexible JPEG 2000 standard.

[1]  S. Daly Application of a noise-adaptive contrast sensitivity function to image data compression , 1990 .

[2]  Lina J. Karam,et al.  APIC: adaptive perceptual image coding based on subband decomposition with locally adaptive perceptual weighting , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing.

[3]  Michael W. Marcellin,et al.  JPEG2000 - image compression fundamentals, standards and practice , 2002, The Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science.

[4]  Joan L. Mitchell,et al.  JPEG: Still Image Data Compression Standard , 1992 .

[5]  Riccardo Leonardi,et al.  Perceptual embedded image coding using wavelet transforms , 1995, Proceedings., International Conference on Image Processing.

[6]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Unifying analysis of full reference image quality assessment , 2008, 2008 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[7]  Gustavo de Veciana,et al.  An information fidelity criterion for image quality assessment using natural scene statistics , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[8]  Mark D. Fairchild,et al.  The iCAM Framework for Image Appearance, Image Differences, and Image Quality , 2002 .

[9]  Thomas Richter,et al.  Toward objective image quality metrics: the AIC Eval Program of the JPEG , 2008, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[10]  Thomas Richter Effective visual masking techniques in JPEG200 , 2008, ICIP.

[11]  Hans-Peter Seidel,et al.  Predicting visible differences in high dynamic range images: model and its calibration , 2005, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[12]  Mark D. Fairchild,et al.  iCAM framework for image appearance, differences, and quality , 2004, J. Electronic Imaging.

[13]  Andrew B. Watson,et al.  Perceptual optimization of DCT color quantization matrices , 1994, Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Image Processing.

[14]  Robert W. Heath,et al.  Rate Bounds on SSIM Index of Quantized Image DCT Coefficients , 2008, Data Compression Conference (dcc 2008).

[15]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Perceptual Image Coding Based on a Maximum of Minimal Structural Similarity Criterion , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[16]  Amy R. Reibman,et al.  Quality assessment for super-resolution image enhancement , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Image Processing.

[17]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Multi-scale structural similarity for image quality assessment , 2003 .

[18]  Wenjun Zeng,et al.  Point-wise extended visual masking for JPEG-2000 image compression , 2000, Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.00CH37101).

[19]  David S. Taubman,et al.  High performance scalable image compression with EBCOT , 1999, Proceedings 1999 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. 99CH36348).

[20]  Sheila S. Hemami,et al.  Understanding and simplifying the structural similarity metric , 2008, 2008 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[21]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Image information and visual quality , 2006, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[22]  John D. Villasenor,et al.  Visibility of wavelet quantization noise , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[23]  Mark D. Fairchild,et al.  Development and Testing of a Color Space (IPT) with Improved Hue Uniformity , 1998, CIC.

[24]  Scott J. Daly,et al.  Application of a Noise Adaptive Contrast Sensitivity Function to Image Data Compression , 1989, Photonics West - Lasers and Applications in Science and Engineering.

[25]  Arun N. Netravali,et al.  Digital Pictures: Representation and Compression , 1988 .

[26]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.