The Role of the Exercise Test in the Evaluation of Patients for Ischemic Heart Disease

A cohort of 1472 patients who underwent both exercise stress testing and coronary angiography within six weeks was examined. The data indicated that a combination of exercise parameters is both diagnostically and prognostically important. Almost all patients (> 97%) who had positive exercise tests at Stage I or Stage II had significant coronary artery disease. More than half of these (> 60%) had three vessel disease and over 25% had significant narrowing (> 50%) of the left main coronary artery. Patients who achieved Stage IV or greater exercise durations with either negative or indeterminate ST-segment response had less than a 15% prevalence of three vessel disease and less than a 1% prevalence of left main coronary artery disease. A low risk subgroup (75% of all nonoperated patients) was identified with a twelve month survival greater than 99%. A high risk subgroup (11% of all nonoperated patients) was identified with a twelve month survival of less than 85%. The exercise test is a noninvasive, reproducible method to assess the presence and extent of anatomic disease and the prognosis when significant disease has been defined. It should be used in conjunction with other noninvasive tests to determine optimal management in patients evaluated for ischemic heart disease.

[1]  R A Bruce,et al.  Exercise testing for evaluation of ventricular function. , 1977, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  A. Selzer,et al.  Treadmill stress tests as indicators of presence and severity of coronary artery disease. , 1976, Annals of internal medicine.

[3]  V. Froelicher,et al.  Value of exercise testing for screening asymptomatic men for latent coronary artery disease. , 1976, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[4]  S. Epstein,et al.  Limitations of the electrocardiographic response to exercise in predicting coronary-artery disease. , 1975, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  C F Starmer,et al.  A new information system for medical practice. , 1975, Archives of internal medicine.

[6]  M. Ellestad,et al.  Predictive Implications of Stress Testing: Follow‐up of 2700 Subjects After Maximum Treadmill Stress Testing , 1975, Circulation.

[7]  R A Bruce,et al.  Separation of effects of cardiovascular disease and age on ventricular function with maximal exercise. , 1974, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  R. Rosati,et al.  The Nature of Treatment Selection in Coronary Artery Disease: Experience with Medical and Surgical Treatment of a Chronic Disease , 1974, Circulation.

[9]  V. Behar,et al.  Graded Exercise Stress Tests in Angiographically Documented Coronary Artery Disease , 1974, Circulation.

[10]  H. Dennis Tolley,et al.  A Linear Models Approach to the Analysis of Survival and Extent of Disease in Multidimensional Contingency Tables , 1972 .

[11]  D. Cox.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 1972 .

[12]  R. Bruce.  Exercise testing of patients with coronary heart disease. Principles and normal standards for evaluation. , 1971, Annals of clinical research.

[13]  C. G. Blomqvist,et al.  Use of Exercise Testing for Diagnostic and Functional Evaluation of Patients with Arteriosclerotic Heart Disease , 1971, Circulation.

[14]  L. T. Sheffield,et al.  Comparison of submaximal exercise ECG test with coronary cineangiocardiogram. , 1970, Annals of internal medicine.

[15]  R. Bruce,et al.  Comparative Effects of Aging and Coronary Heart Disease on Submaximal and Maximal Exercise , 1969, Circulation.

[16]  R. Bruce,et al.  Exercise stress testing in evaluation of patients with ischemic heart disease. , 1969, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[17]  F. Ederer,et al.  Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival. , 1958, Journal of chronic diseases.