The Costs of Accepting Gender Differences: The Role of Stereotype Endorsement in Women's Experience in the Math Domain

Two studies were designed to examine the costs of stereotype endorsement for women's self-perceptions, career intentions, and susceptibility to stereotype threat in the math domain. Study 1, a survey of women majoring in math-related fields, revealed that women who believe that status differences between the sexes are legitimate were more likely to endorse gender stereotypes about women's math abilities, which in turn predicted more negative self-perceptions of math competence and less interest in continuing study in one's field. In Study 2, women who tended to endorse gender stereotypes were found to be more susceptible to the negative effects of stereotype threat on their math test performance. The implications of these results for research on stereotype endorsement and women's math achievement are discussed.

[1]  Felicia Pratto,et al.  The inevitability of oppression and the dynamics of social dominance. , 1993 .

[2]  F. Pratto,et al.  In-Group Identification, Social Dominance Orientation, and Differential Intergroup Social Allocation , 1994 .

[3]  Janis E. Jacobs,et al.  Gender stereotypes: Implications for gifted education , 1994 .

[4]  Toni Schmader,et al.  Coping with stigma through psychological disengagement. , 1998 .

[5]  Roslyn A. Korb,et al.  Postsecondary Institutions in the United States: 1997-98. , 1999 .

[6]  Margaret Walsh,et al.  Influence of Item Content and Stereotype Situation on Gender Differences in Mathematical Problem Solving , 1999 .

[7]  M. Lerner,et al.  The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion , 1980 .

[8]  M. Banaji,et al.  The role of stereotyping in system‐justification and the production of false consciousness , 1994 .

[9]  B. Major,et al.  Devaluing domains in response to threatening intergroup comparisons: perceived legitimacy and the status value asymmetry. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  J. Crocker,et al.  When ideology hurts: effects of belief in the protestant ethic and feeling overweight on the psychological well-being of women. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Sylvia Beyer,et al.  Gender Differences in the Accuracy of Grade Expectancies and Evaluations , 1999 .

[12]  Claude M. Steele,et al.  The Mentor’s Dilemma: Providing Critical Feedback Across the Racial Divide , 1999 .

[13]  Bilian Ni Sullivan,et al.  Social Inequality and the Reduction of Ideological Dissonance on Behalf of the System: Evidence of Enhanced System Justification among the Disadvantaged , 2001 .

[14]  J. Sinacore.  Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions , 1993 .

[15]  J. Turner,et al.  Social status, cognitive alternatives, and intergroup relations: (668292012-213) , 1976 .

[16]  M. Inzlicht,et al.  Do High-Achieving Female Students Underperform in Private? The Implications of Threatening Environments on Intellectual Processing , 2003 .

[17]  C. Steele,et al.  Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  B. Major,et al.  From social inequality to personal entitlement: the role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and group membership , 1994 .

[19]  Rosalind C. Barnett,et al.  Learning in a Man's World: Examining the Perceptions of Undergraduate Women in Male-Dominated Academic Areas , 2002 .

[20]  When ideology hurts: effects of belief in the protestant ethic and feeling overweight on the psychological well-being of women. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  S. Spencer,et al.  Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat , 2002 .

[22]  Maurie Caitlin Kelly,et al.  Government Printing Office expands database access , 1995 .

[23]  Michael Inzlicht,et al.  A Threatening Intellectual Environment: Why Females Are Susceptible to Experiencing Problem-Solving Deficits in the Presence of Males , 2000, Psychological science.

[24]  S. Spencer,et al.  Consuming Images: How Television Commercials that Elicit Stereotype Threat Can Restrain Women Academically and Professionally , 2002 .

[25]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me. , 2002 .

[26]  S. Spencer,et al.  The Interference of Stereotype Threat With Women's Generation of Mathematical Problem-Solving Strategies , 2001 .

[27]  J. Eccles,et al.  Gender Role Stereotypes, Expectancy Effects, and Parents' Socialization of Gender Differences , 1990 .

[28]  R. Bourhis,et al.  Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations , 1991 .

[29]  J. Crocker,et al.  A Collective Self-Esteem Scale: Self-Evaluation of One's Social Identity , 1992 .

[30]  C. Steele.  A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[31]  Jim Sidanius,et al.  Ethnic Identity, Legitimizing Ideologies, and Social Status: A Matter of Ideological Asymmetry , 1998 .

[32]  Richard D. Harvey,et al.  A Q-Methodological Study of Women's Subjective Perspectives on Mathematics , 2003 .

[33]  Michael Johns,et al.  Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[35]  Johannes Keller,et al.  Blatant Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance: Self-Handicapping as a Strategic Means to Cope with Obtrusive Negative Performance Expectations , 2002 .

[36]  B. Major,et al.  Perceiving personal discrimination: the role of group status and legitimizing ideology. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  Mark L. Davison,et al.  Gender Differences by Item Difficulty Interactions in Multiple-Choice Mathematics Items , 1998 .

[38]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Beliefs About Inequality: American's Views of What Is and What Ought To Be , 1987 .

[39]  N. Ellemers,et al.  Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies. , 1993 .

[40]  Susan M. Haller,et al.  Gender differences in computer science students , 2003, SIGCSE.

[41]  H. Blanton,et al.  Social Identity versus Reference Frame Comparisons: The Moderating Role of Stereotype Endorsement☆ , 2002 .

[42]  Joachim Tiedemann.  Parents' gender stereotypes and teachers' beliefs as predictors of children's concept of their mathematical ability in elementary school. , 2000 .

[43]  Paul H. White,et al.  An Examination of Implicitly Activated, Explicitly Activated, and Nullified Stereotypes on Mathematical Performance: It's Not Just a Woman's Issue , 2002 .

[44]  N. Ambady,et al.  Stereotype Susceptibility: Identity Salience and Shifts in Quantitative Performance , 1999 .

[45]  Toni Schmader,et al.  Gender Identification Moderates Stereotype Threat Effects on Women's Math Performance ☆ ☆☆ ★ , 2002 .

[46]  T. Heatherton,et al.  Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. , 1991 .

[47]  Carolyn Hopp,et al.  Gender Comparisons of Mathematics Attitudes and Affect: A Meta-Analysis , 1990 .

[48]  Sylvia Beyer,et al.  Gender Differences in Self-Perception and Negative Recall Biases , 1998 .

[49]  S. Spencer,et al.  Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance , 1999 .

[50]  C. Dweck,et al.  Implicit theories, attributions, and coping : A meaning system approach , 1999 .