Infants' delayed recognition memory and forgetting.

Abstract Infants 21- to 25-weeks-old devoted more visual fixation to novel than to previously exposed stimuli on immediate and delayed tests of recognition. Abstract black and white patterns were recognized following a 48-hour delay and photos of faces after a 2-week delay. A decline in recognition over 3 hours for targets (face masks) most akin to objects (real faces) in S 's environment led to studies of the effect on delayed recognition of exposure to stimuli similar to those to be retained. One-minute delayed recognition for face photos was disrupted by intervening exposure to intermediate similarity stimuli (rotated photos) but was unaffected by exposure to either high (upright photos) or low (rotated line drawings) similarity stimuli. Differentiation among intervening stimuli occurred only for the upright photos used as high-similarity intervening material. In addition, immediate exposure to rotated photos also prevented 3-hour-delayed recognition of upright photos but had no such effect when delayed for 3 hours. The present experiments confirm the existence of long-term recognition memory for pictorial stimuli in the early months of life and show that one source of forgetting is due to a diversion of the infant's attention to material bearing some perceptual similarity to the material to be retained. This diversion of attention must occur soon after immediate recognition testing to produce a reduction of recognition and such deleterious effects last for an appreciable period of time.

[1]  J. Campione,et al.  Recognition memory for perceptually similar pictures in preschool children. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  J. Kagan,et al.  Individual Differences in the Infant's Distribution of Attention to Stimulus Discrepancy. , 1970 .

[3]  R. Shepard Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures , 1967 .

[4]  J. Fagan Memory in the infant. , 1970, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[5]  Joseph F. Fagan Infants' recognition memory for a series of visual stimuli. , 1971, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[6]  E. W. Ames,et al.  Response to novelty as an indicator of visual discrimination in the human infant , 1964 .

[7]  A. Moffett Stimulus complexity as a determinant of visual attention in infants. , 1969, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[8]  R. L. Fantz Visual Experience in Infants: Decreased Attention to Familiar Patterns Relative to Novel Ones , 1964, Science.

[9]  J. Fagan,et al.  Infants' recognition memory for faces. , 1972, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[10]  R. L. Frantz,et al.  Maturation of pattern vision in infants during the first six months. , 1962 .

[11]  Raymond S. Nickerson,et al.  A note on long-term recognition memory for pictorial material , 1968 .

[12]  E. W. Ames,et al.  Age Differences in Infants' Attention to Patterns of Different Complexities , 1966, Science.

[13]  A. J. Caron,et al.  The effects of repeated exposure and stimulus complexity on visual fixation in infants , 1968 .

[14]  A. L. Brown,et al.  Recognition memory for pictures in preschool children. , 1971, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[15]  B. Wilcox Visual preferences of human infants for representations of the human face. , 1969, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology.

[16]  S B Miranda,et al.  Visual abilities and pattern preferences of premature infants and full-term neonates. , 1970, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[17]  M. H. Parry,et al.  Perceptual-motor behaviour in infancy as a function of age and stimulus familiarity. , 1969, British journal of psychology.

[18]  L B Cohen,et al.  Recovery of habituation in infants. , 1970, Journal of experimental child psychology.