Modulation characteristics of quantum-dot lasers: the influence of p-type doping and the electronic density of states on obtaining high speed

The influence of p-type modulation doping on self-organized quantum-dot lasers is studied using a quasiequilibrium model that includes the multi-discrete energy levels and the energy levels of the wetting layer. Calculations are presented showing that laser performance can be greatly enhanced through p-doping and that, in contrast to planar quantum-well lasers, the p-doping requirements are moderate. Optimized cavity lengths are found, and the threshold temperature and modulation characteristics are determined for these cavity lengths. The model shows that close energy spacing of the discrete hole levels can severely limit the modulation response, as suggested previously, and that this effect is countered through creation of an excess hole concentration using p-type doping. Good agreement is obtained with the modulation response reported in recent experiments for undoped quantum-dot active regions. The calculations suggest that bandwidths greater than 30 GHz can be obtained with sufficient p-doping. A reduction in the inhomogeneous broadening might increase the laser speed to over 60 GHz.

[1]  Masahiro Asada,et al.  Threshold current density of GaInAsP/InP quantum-box lasers , 1989 .

[2]  Johann Peter Reithmaier,et al.  High frequency characteristics of InAs/GaInAs quantum dot distributed feedback lasers emitting at 1.3 /spl mu/m , 2001 .

[3]  M. Asada,et al.  Gain and the threshold of three-dimensional quantum-box lasers , 1986 .

[4]  Dennis G. Deppe,et al.  The role of p-type doping and the density of states on the modulation response of quantum dot lasers , 2002 .

[5]  D. Bimberg,et al.  Electronic and optical properties of strained quantum dots modeled by 8-band k⋅p theory , 1999 .

[6]  D. Deppe,et al.  Low-threshold high-T/sub 0/ 1.3-/spl mu/m InAs quantum-dot lasers due to p-type modulation doping of the active region , 2002, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[7]  K. Nishi,et al.  Homogeneous linewidth broadening in a In0.5Ga0.5As/GaAs single quantum dot at room temperature investigated using a highly sensitive near-field scanning optical microscope , 2001 .

[8]  Dennis G. Deppe,et al.  1.3 μm InAs quantum dot laser with To=161 K from 0 to 80 °C , 2002 .

[9]  Diana L. Huffaker,et al.  Dynamic response of 1.3-μm-wavelength InGaAs/GaAs quantum dots , 2000 .

[10]  Jean-Pierre Leburton,et al.  Interband Transition Distributions in the Optical Spectra of InAs/GaAs Self-Assembled Quantum Dots , 2002, Physical Models for Quantum Dots.

[11]  Kerry J. Vahala,et al.  Quantum box fabrication tolerance and size limits in semiconductors and their effect on optical gain , 1988 .

[12]  Self-assembled In/sub 0.5/Ga/sub 0.5/As quantum-dot lasers with doped active region , 2000 .

[13]  D. Deppe,et al.  Low-threshold oxide-confined 1.3-μm quantum-dot laser , 2000, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[14]  Mikhail V. Maximov,et al.  Low threshold, large To injection laser emission from (InGa)As quantum dots , 1994 .

[15]  Diana L. Huffaker,et al.  Quantum dimensionality, entropy, and the modulation response of quantum dot lasers , 2000 .

[16]  Diana L. Huffaker,et al.  InGaAs quantum dot lasers with submilliamp thresholds and ultra-low threshold current density below room temperature , 2000 .

[17]  S. Sugou,et al.  Low chirp operation in 1.6 /spl mu/m quantum dot laser under 2.5 GHz direct modulation , 2001 .

[18]  Alfred Forchel,et al.  Temperature dependence of the exciton homogeneous linewidth in In 0.60 Ga 0.40 As/GaAs self-assembled quantum dots , 2002 .

[19]  Joo-Heon Ahn,et al.  High temperature performance of self-organised quantum dot laser with stacked p-doped active region , 2002 .

[20]  Andreas Stintz,et al.  Extremely low room-temperature threshold current density diode lasers using InAs dots in In/sub 0.15/Ga/sub 0.85/As quantum well , 1999 .

[21]  K. Nishi,et al.  Low chirp observed in directly modulated quantum dot lasers , 2000, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[22]  S. Krishna,et al.  High-speed modulation and switching characteristics of In(Ga)As-Al(Ga)As self-organized quantum-dot lasers , 2000, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.

[23]  Yasuhiko Arakawa,et al.  Quantum well lasers--Gain, spectra, dynamics , 1986 .

[24]  Diana L. Huffaker,et al.  Spontaneous emission and threshold characteristics of 1.3-/spl mu/m InGaAs-GaAs quantum-dot GaAs-based lasers , 1999 .

[25]  Diana L. Huffaker,et al.  Electroluminescence efficiency of 1.3 μm wavelength InGaAs/GaAs quantum dots , 1998 .

[26]  Kerry J. Vahala,et al.  Effect of doping on the optical gain and the spontaneous noise enhancement factor in quantum well amplifiers and lasers studied by simple analytical expressions , 1988 .