Geotechnical Characterization by In situ and Lab Tests to the Back-Analysis of a Supported Excavation in Metro do Porto

This paper summarizes the geotechnical characterization conducted for the design and subsequent analysis of a strutted excavation in “Metro do Porto”. This region is geologically dominated by heterogeneous weathered granite masses with deep residual soil profiles. Local saprolitic soils exhibit, by their nature, a particular behavior characterized by very sensitive and weak relic micro-structures, due to their specific genesis. This study has included the interpretation of a significant volume of in situ test results, triaxial tests over undisturbed samples and monitoring data, giving rise to specific correlations between testing and design parameters. Real time monitoring enabled a back-analysis by FEM of a well instrumented section of the strutted excavation, which was calibrated taking into account the derived correlations and the deformability behavior of this specific geotechnical ambient. This geomaterial, although revealing very high initial stiffness values (for very small strain ranges) has shown low stiffness values for “medium to high” strain levels, reflecting a singular strong non-linearity in the stress-strain behavior.

[1]  P. K. Robertson,et al.  USE AND INTERPRETATION OF A RESEARCH DILATOMETER , 1991 .

[2]  George E. Blandford,et al.  Elasticity of Particulate Materials , 1989 .

[3]  Jaime A. Santos,et al.  Characterization of a profile of residual soil from granite combining geological, geophysical and mechanical testing techniques , 2006 .

[4]  Renato Lancellotta,et al.  New developments in field and laboratory testing of soils -Theme Lecture , 1985 .

[5]  Daniel Fortuna do Couto.  Metro do Porto , 2006 .

[6]  Roberto Quental Coutinho,et al.  Characterization of residual soils , 2008 .

[7]  Manuel Matos Fernandes,et al.  Interpretation of a footing load test on a saprolitic soil from granite , 1997 .

[8]  Ryoji Iwasaki,et al.  ON DYNAMIC SHEAR MODULI AND POISSON'S RATIOS OF SOIL DEPOSITS , 1973 .

[9]  P. K. Robertson,et al.  Future trends for penetration testing (Closing address) , 1989 .

[10]  Silvano Marchetti,et al.  In Situ Tests by Flat Dilatometer , 1980 .

[11]  A. Viana da Fonseca,et al.  Characterising and deriving engineering properties of a saprolitic soil from granite, in Porto , 2003 .

[12]  N. Janbu.  Soil Compressibility as Determined by Oedometer and Triaxial Tests , 1963 .

[13]  Roman D. Hryciw.  SMALL-STRAIN-SHEAR MODULUS OF SOIL BY DILATOMETER , 1990 .

[14]  Peter K. Robertson,et al.  Interpretation of cone penetration tests. Part I: Sand , 1983 .

[15]  T Lunne,et al.  CALIBRATION OF DILATOMETER CORRELATIONS , 1989 .

[16]  P. Robertson.  Soil classification using the cone penetration test , 1990 .

[17]  F. Tatsuoka,et al.  A SIMPLE GAUGE FOR LOCAL SMALL STRAIN MEASUREMENTS IN THE LABORATORY , 1991 .

[18]  Hiroyuki Tanaka,et al.  CHARACTERIZATION OF SANDY SOILS USING CPT AND DMT , 1998 .