Artifactual Agency In Open Design

We readily use artifacts in theorizing and accounting for epistemic work. Yet the agency characteristics of artifacts and notably their relations to their creators (the subjects) are less understood as agency is more socially privileged than artifactually focused. Rather than understanding the ways artifacts are appropriated as utility objects, we examine the ebb and flow of agency to account for how the subjects implement, express, and document performativity through artifacts. Using an archival analytical approach, we examine design activities and artifacts on Thingiverse – an online platform for open design. Our findings suggest design derivation is driven by four types of artifactual agency manifested within the context of subject-artifact relationships. First, agency-in-situ concerns the creation of artifacts as instances resulting from a self-reflexive process in response to situational demands and contexts. Second, agency-in-use concerns the use of artifacts to signal a designer’s specialism (ability, skill) and to induce further redesign and learning. Third, agency-in-practice concerns the use of artifacts as a collective effort which addresses the needs of a specific user group. Lastly, agency-in-flux concerns a co-integration of agencies that are harmoniously yet dynamically assembled in propagating and accumulating design knowledge across different contexts of use. The four types contribute to the assemblage of performativity in design. Each time when an artifactual agency is enacted, new design ideas, materials and techniques are created and added to the commons.

[1]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Action Design Research , 2011, MIS Q..

[2]  François-Xavier de Vaujany,et al.  Capturing reflexivity modes in IS: A critical realist approach , 2008, Inf. Organ..

[3]  Fabio Kon,et al.  The attraction of contributors in free and open source software projects , 2013, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Jeanette Blomberg,et al.  Working artefacts: ethnomethods of the prototype. , 2002, The British journal of sociology.

[5]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  A theory of digital objects , 2010, First Monday.

[6]  Nicola F. Johnson,et al.  The Teenage Expertise Network (TEN): an online ethnographic approach , 2012 .

[7]  R. Keith Sawyer,et al.  Unresolved Tensions in Sociocultural Theory: Analogies with Contemporary Sociological Debates , 2002 .

[8]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[9]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint, and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies , 2011, MIS Q..

[10]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[11]  Jacky Swan,et al.  Understanding the Role of Objects in Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[12]  Bill Doolin,et al.  Sociomateriality and boundary objects in information systems development , 2012, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Linda D. Peters,et al.  Constructivism and critical realism as alternative approaches to the study of business networks: Convergences and divergences in theory and in research practice , 2013 .

[14]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[15]  Cornelius Herstatt,et al.  On the Open Design of Tangible Goods , 2009 .

[16]  Charlotte P. Lee,et al.  Boundary Negotiating Artifacts: Unbinding the Routine of Boundary Objects and Embracing Chaos in Collaborative Work , 2007, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[17]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Digital materiality? How artifacts without matter, matter , 2010, First Monday.

[18]  John M. Silvester,et al.  The Social Life of Information: Brown, J.S., & Duguid, P. (2000). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing. ISBN 0-87584-762-5. 320 pages , 2000, Internet High. Educ..

[19]  Alistair Mutch,et al.  Technology, Organization, and Structure - A Morphogenetic Approach , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[20]  M. Archer Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation , 2003 .

[21]  John Seely Brown,et al.  Book Reviews : The Social Life of Information By John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000. 320 pages , 2000 .

[22]  L. Suchman Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions (2nd edition). , 2007 .

[23]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions , 2006 .

[24]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  Information Technology Implementers' Responses to User Resistance: Nature and Effects , 2012, MIS Q..

[25]  Frank Blackler,et al.  On the Life of the Object , 2005 .

[26]  R. Miettinen,et al.  Epistemic Objects, Artefacts and Organizational Change , 2005 .

[27]  A. Appadurai,et al.  The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. , 1988 .

[28]  Angela Dumas,et al.  Managing the Form, Function, and Fit of DESIGN , 2010 .

[29]  A. Salter,et al.  Postcards from the Edge: Local Communities, Global Programs and Boundary Objects , 2004 .

[30]  J. Kallinikos On the Computational Rendition of Reality: Artefacts and Human Agency , 2009 .

[31]  Scott F. Turner,et al.  A Balancing Act: How Organizations Pursue Consistency in Routine Functioning in the Face of Ongoing Change , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[32]  M. Archer,et al.  Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach , 1997 .

[33]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action , 2008, Inf. Organ..

[34]  Karen Barad Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning , 2007 .

[35]  K. K. Cetina Sociality with Objects , 1997 .

[36]  Hod Lipson,et al.  Fabricated: The New World of 3D Printing , 2013 .

[37]  J. López,et al.  After Postmodernism: An Introduction to Critical Realism , 2005 .

[38]  Anat Rafaeli,et al.  Emotion as a Connection of Physical Artifacts and Organizations , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[39]  Luciana D'Adderio Artifacts at the centre of routines: performing the material turn in routines theory , 2010, Journal of Institutional Economics.