Evaluation of a Novel Continuous Glucose Measurement Device in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus across the Glycemic Range

Background: This glucose clamp study assessed the performance of an electrochemical continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system for monitoring levels of interstitial glucose. This novel system does not require use of a trocar or needle for sensor insertion. Method: Continuous glucose monitoring sensors were inserted subcutaneously into the abdominal tissue of 14 adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Subjects underwent an automated glucose clamp procedure with four consecutive post-steady-state glucose plateau periods (40 min each): (a) hypoglycemic (50 mg/dl) (b) hyperglycemic (250 mg/dl), (c) second hypoglycemic (50 mg/dl), and (d) euglycemic (90 mg/dl). Plasma glucose results obtained with YSI glucose analyzers were used for sensor calibration. Accuracy was assessed retrospectively for plateau periods and transition states, when glucose levels were changing rapidly (approximately 2 mg/dl/min). Results: Mean absolute percent difference (APD) was lowest during hypoglycemic plateaus (11.68%, 14.15%) and the euglycemic-to-hypoglycemic transition (14.21%). Mean APD during the hyperglycemic plateau was 17.11%; mean APDs were 18.12% and 19.25% during the hypoglycemic-to-hyperglycemic and hyperglycemic-to-hypoglycemic transitions, respectively. Parkes (consensus) error grid analysis (EGA) and rate EGA of the plateaus and transition periods, respectively, yielded 86.8% and 68.6% accurate results (zone A) and 12.1% and 20.0% benign errors (zone B). Continuous EGA yielded 88.5%, 75.4%, and 79.3% accurate results and 8.3%, 14.3%, and 2.4% benign errors for the euglycemic, hyperglycemic, and hypoglycemic transition periods, respectively. Adverse events were mild and unlikely to be device related. Conclusion: This novel CGM system was safe and accurate across the clinically relevant glucose range.

[1]  William L Clarke,et al.  Comparison of the clinical information provided by the FreeStyle Navigator continuous interstitial glucose monitor versus traditional blood glucose readings. , 2010, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[2]  S. Genuth,et al.  The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Jay Shubrook,et al.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in a Rural Intensive Care Unit: A Pilot Study Evaluating Accuracy and Acceptance , 2010, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[4]  G M Steil,et al.  Can interstitial glucose assessment replace blood glucose measurements? , 2000, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[5]  D. Klonoff Continuous glucose monitoring: roadmap for 21st century diabetes therapy. , 2005, Diabetes care.

[6]  Seiya Shimoda,et al.  Development of a highly responsive needle-type glucose sensor using polyimide for a wearable artificial endocrine pancreas , 2006, Journal of Artificial Organs.

[7]  D. B. Keenan,et al.  Delays in Minimally Invasive Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices: A Review of Current Technology , 2009, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[8]  S. Garg,et al.  Comparison of accuracy and safety of the SEVEN and the Navigator continuous glucose monitoring systems. , 2009, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[9]  S. Garg,et al.  Improved glucose excursions using an implantable real-time continuous glucose sensor in adults with type 1 diabetes. , 2004, Diabetes care.

[10]  Irl B. Hirsch,et al.  Clinical review: Realistic expectations and practical use of continuous glucose monitoring for the endocrinologist. , 2009, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[11]  Howard C. Zisser,et al.  Accuracy of the SEVEN® Continuous Glucose Monitoring System: Comparison with Frequently Sampled Venous Glucose Measurements , 2009, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[12]  C. D. Miller,et al.  Hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. , 2001, Archives of internal medicine.

[13]  R. Mazze,et al.  Evaluating the accuracy, reliability, and clinical applicability of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM): Is CGM ready for real time? , 2009, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[14]  B. Goodwin,et al.  The Draize test and modifications. , 1985, Current problems in dermatology.

[15]  W. Clarke The original Clarke Error Grid Analysis (EGA). , 2005, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[16]  Boris Kovatchev,et al.  Evaluating the clinical accuracy of two continuous glucose sensors using continuous glucose-error grid analysis. , 2005, Diabetes care.

[17]  G. Fulcher,et al.  Unrecognized hypo- and hyperglycemia in well-controlled patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the results of continuous glucose monitoring. , 2003, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[18]  B H Ginsberg,et al.  A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose. , 2000, Diabetes care.

[19]  F. Hariri,et al.  Interstitial fluid glucose dynamics during insulin-induced hypoglycaemia , 2005, Diabetologia.

[20]  R. Holman,et al.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. , 1998 .