Quantitative analysis of template-based attenuation compensation in 3D brain PET

An atlas-guided attenuation correction method was recently proposed for 3D brain positron emission tomography (PET) imaging eliminating the need for acquisition of a patient-specific measured transmission scan. The algorithm was validated through comparison to transmission-based attenuation correction (gold standard) using voxelwise statistical parametric mapping (SPM) analysis of clinical data. In contrast to brain 'activation' studies for which SPM is primarily developed, brain PET research studies often involve absolute quantification. In the preliminary validation study published earlier, there is no validation as to how such quantification can be affected by the two methods as the assessment was carried out by an SPM group analysis alone. It is quite important to demonstrate how the proposed method performs individually, particularly for diagnostic applications or individual quantification. In this study, we assess the quantitative accuracy of this method in clinical setting using automated volume of interest (VOI)-based analysis by means of the commercially available BRASS software. There is a very good correlation (R(2)=0.91) between the atlas-guided and measured transmission-guided attenuation correction techniques and the regression line agreed well with the line of identity (slope=0.96) for the grouped analysis of patient data. The mean relative difference between the two methods for all VOIs across the whole population is 2.3% whereas the maximum difference is less than 7%. No proof of statistically significant differences could be verified for all regions. These encouraging results provide further confidence in the adequacy of the proposed approach demonstrating its performance particularly for research studies or diagnostic applications involving quantification.

[1]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Correction for image degrading factors is essential for accurate quantification of brain function using PET. For the proposition. , 2004, Medical physics.

[2]  V J Cunningham,et al.  11C-Diprenorphine Binding in Huntington's Disease: A Comparison of Region of Interest Analysis with Statistical Parametric Mapping , 1997, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[3]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging-guided attenuation and scatter corrections in three-dimensional brain positron emission tomography. , 2003, Medical physics.

[4]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Determination of the attenuation map in emission tomography. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  A Boudraa,et al.  Fuzzy clustering-based segmented attenuation correction in whole-body PET imaging. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  S C Strother,et al.  Comparison of voxel- and volume-of-interest-based analyses in FDG PET scans of HIV positive and healthy individuals. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  Peter J Ell,et al.  Nuclear medicine in neurology and psychiatry , 1999, The Lancet.

[8]  S. Siegel,et al.  Implementation and evaluation of a calculated attenuation correction for PET , 1991, Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[9]  G. Hutchins,et al.  Automated PET attenuation correction model for functional brain imaging. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric mapping in functional neuroimaging: beyond PET and fMRI activation studies. , 1998, European journal of nuclear medicine.

[11]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Strategies for attenuation compensation in neurological PET studies , 2007, NeuroImage.

[12]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Assessment of the impact of model-based scatter correction on [18F]-FDG 3D brain PET in healthy subjects using statistical parametric mapping , 2003, NeuroImage.

[13]  C. C. Watson New, faster, image-based scatter correction for 3D PET , 1999 .

[14]  H Zaidi,et al.  Feasibility of a novel design of high resolution parallax-free Compton enhanced PET scanner dedicated to brain research. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Rapid Assessment of Regional Cerebral Metabolic Abnormalities in Single Subjects with Quantitative and Nonquantitative [18F]FDG PET: A Clinical Validation of Statistical Parametric Mapping , 1999, NeuroImage.

[16]  R. Boellaard,et al.  Experimental and clinical evaluation of iterative reconstruction (OSEM) in dynamic PET: quantitative characteristics and effects on kinetic modeling. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Analytic 3D image reconstruction using all detected events , 1989 .

[18]  M. King,et al.  Human-observer receiver-operating-characteristic evaluation of attenuation, scatter, and resolution compensation strategies for (99m)Tc myocardial perfusion imaging. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  X. Bosch,et al.  Imaging the brain. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  Attenuation correction of PET activation studies in the presenceof task-related motion , 2003, NeuroImage.

[21]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Assessment of errors caused by X-ray scatter and use of contrast medium when using CT-based attenuation correction in PET , 2006, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[22]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Attenuation compensation in cerebral 3D PET: effect of the attenuation map on absolute and relative quantitation , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[23]  Colin Studholme,et al.  An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment , 1999, Pattern Recognit..

[24]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Quantitative Analysis in Nuclear Medicine Imaging , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[25]  Cyrill Burger,et al.  Impact of metallic dental implants on CT-based attenuation correction in a combined PET/CT scanner , 2003, European Radiology.

[26]  P J Slomka,et al.  Evaluation of linear registration algorithms for brain SPECT and the errors due to hypoperfusion lesions. , 2001, Medical physics.

[27]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Novel Geometrical Concept of a High Performance Brain PET Scanner : Principle, Design and Performance Estimates , 2004 .

[28]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Computed tomography-based attenuation correction in neurological positron emission tomography: evaluation of the effect of the X-ray tube voltage on quantitative analysis , 2006, Nuclear medicine communications.

[29]  Ingeborg Goethals,et al.  Analysis of clinical brain SPECT data based on anatomic standardization and reference to normal data: an ROC-based comparison of visual, semiquantitative, and voxel-based methods. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[30]  Manuel Desco,et al.  Influence of the normalization template on the outcome of statistical parametric mapping of PET scans , 2003, NeuroImage.

[31]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Atlas-guided non-uniform attenuation correction in cerebral 3D PET imaging , 2005, NeuroImage.

[32]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) , 2008, Scholarpedia.

[33]  P J Slomka,et al.  Automated three-dimensional quantification of myocardial perfusion and brain SPECT. , 2001, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[34]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  The New Challenges of Brain PET Imaging Technology , 2006 .

[35]  Karl Herholz,et al.  Positron emission tomography in clinical neurology. , 2004, Molecular imaging and biology : MIB : the official publication of the Academy of Molecular Imaging.

[36]  C. C. Watson,et al.  New, faster, image-based scatter correction for 3D PET , 1999, 1999 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record. 1999 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.99CH37019).

[37]  S R Meikle,et al.  Validation of postinjection transmission measurements for attenuation correction in neurological FDG-PET studies. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[38]  J M Links Special issues in quantitation of brain receptors and related markers by emission computed tomography. , 1998, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology.

[39]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Quantitative Analysis in Functional Brain Imaging , 2006 .