In vivo aspects of protein folding and quality control

BACKGROUND Proteins are synthesized on ribosomes as linear chains of amino acids and must fold into unique three-dimensional structures to fulfill their biological functions. Protein folding is intrinsically error-prone, and how it is accomplished efficiently represents a problem of great biological and medical importance. During folding, the nascent polypeptide must navigate a complex energy landscape. As a result, misfolded molecules may accumulate that expose hydrophobic amino acid residues and thus are in danger of forming potentially toxic aggregates. To ensure efficient folding and prevent aggregation, cells in all domains of life express various classes of proteins called molecular chaperones. These proteins receive the nascent polypeptide chain emerging from the ribosome and guide it along a productive folding pathway. Because proteins are structurally dynamic, constant surveillance of the proteome by an integrated network of chaperones and protein degradation machineries, the proteostasis network (PN), is required to maintain protein homeostasis in a range of external and endogenous stress conditions. ADVANCES Over the past decade, we have gained substantial new insight into the overall behavior of the PN and the molecular mechanics of its components. Advances in structural biology and biophysical approaches have allowed chaperone mechanisms to be interrogated at an unprecedented level of detail. Recent work has provided fascinating insight into the process of protein folding on the ribosome and revealed how highly allosteric chaperones such as the heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70), Hsp90, and chaperonin systems modulate the folding energy landscapes of their protein clients. Studies of chaperone systems from bacteria and eukaryotes have revealed common principles underlying the organization of chaperone networks in different domains of life. Recently, we have begun to appreciate the relative complexity of eukaryotic chaperones and are starting to understand how eukaryotes deal with the challenge of folding a large proteome enriched in multidomain proteins. At the cellular level, the response of the PN to conformational stress, aging, and diseases of aberrant protein folding has been an area of intense investigation. Importantly, the capacity of the PN declines during aging and this leads to dysfunction of specific cell types and tissues, rendering the organism susceptible to chronic diseases. Among these, neurodegenerative syndromes associated with protein aggregation are increasingly prevalent in the aging human population. Notably, the accumulation of toxic protein aggregates is both a consequence and a cause of PN decline, driving a vicious cycle that ultimately leads to proteostasis collapse. OUTLOOK A new view of protein folding is emerging, whereby the energy landscapes that proteins navigate during folding in vivo may differ substantially from those observed during refolding in vitro. From the ribosome through to the major chaperone systems, the nascent protein interacts with factors that modulate its folding pathway. Future work should focus on obtaining the high-resolution structural and kinetic information necessary to define the pathways of protein folding during translation, and in association with molecular chaperones. Organisms have evolved various mechanisms to deal with misfolded and aggregated proteins to maintain proteostasis. It is becoming increasingly clear that besides removing these proteins by degradation, cells also strategically sequester them into transient or stable aggregates, often in defined cellular locations. Much remains to be understood about how this cellular decision-making occurs at a molecular level and how dysregulation of these mechanisms leads to proteotoxicity. From a medical perspective, the intimate relationship between proteostasis and disease, aging, and neurodegeneration makes components of the PN logical drug targets, with the goal of promoting healthy aging. Pharmacological manipulation of the PN will require a detailed understanding of how the network responds to perturbation and how its different components cooperate. Molecular chaperones are key players in the cellular proteostasis network and serve to maintain a balanced proteome. They promote the folding of newly synthesized proteins, function in conformational maintenance, and prevent potentially toxic off-pathway aggregation. Chaperones also cooperate with other components of the proteostasis network, such as the proteasome system and autophagy, in the removal of terminally misfolded and aggregated proteins through proteolytic degradation. Most proteins must fold into unique three-dimensional structures to perform their biological functions. In the crowded cellular environment, newly synthesized proteins are at risk of misfolding and forming toxic aggregate species. To ensure efficient folding, different classes of molecular chaperones receive the nascent protein chain emerging from the ribosome and guide it along a productive folding pathway. Because proteins are structurally dynamic, constant surveillance of the proteome by an integrated network of chaperones and protein degradation machineries is required to maintain protein homeostasis (proteostasis). The capacity of this proteostasis network declines during aging, facilitating neurodegeneration and other chronic diseases associated with protein aggregation. Understanding the proteostasis network holds the promise of identifying targets for pharmacological intervention in these pathologies.

[1]  A. Dillin,et al.  Aging as an event of proteostasis collapse. , 2011, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[2]  T. Nyström,et al.  Life-span extension by a metacaspase in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2014, Science.

[3]  P. Spencer,et al.  Silent substitutions predictably alter translation elongation rates and protein folding efficiencies. , 2012, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  J. Yates,et al.  Biological and Structural Basis for Aha1 Regulation of Hsp90 ATPase Activity in Maintaining Proteostasis in the Human Disease Cystic Fibrosis , 2010, Molecular biology of the cell.

[5]  F. Hartl,et al.  GroEL/ES Chaperonin Modulates the Mechanism and Accelerates the Rate of TIM-Barrel Domain Folding , 2014, Cell.

[6]  F. Hartl,et al.  Failure of RQC machinery causes protein aggregation and proteotoxic stress , 2016, Nature.

[7]  I. Tinoco,et al.  The Ribosome Modulates Nascent Protein Folding , 2011, Science.

[8]  Yujin E. Kim,et al.  Molecular chaperone functions in protein folding and proteostasis. , 2013, Annual review of biochemistry.

[9]  Rachel Green,et al.  Clarifying the Translational Pausing Landscape in Bacteria by Ribosome Profiling. , 2016, Cell reports.

[10]  Janine Kirstein,et al.  Crucial HSP70 co-chaperone complex unlocks metazoan protein disaggregation , 2015, Nature.

[11]  Bonnie Berger,et al.  A Quantitative Chaperone Interaction Network Reveals the Architecture of Cellular Protein Homeostasis Pathways , 2014, Cell.

[12]  A. Horovitz,et al.  Allosteric Mechanisms in Chaperonin Machines. , 2016, Chemical reviews.

[13]  S. Lindquist,et al.  Protein folding sculpting evolutionary change. , 2009, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[14]  Michele Vendruscolo,et al.  The molecular chaperone Brichos breaks the catalytic cycle that generates toxic Aβ oligomers , 2015, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[15]  K. Nader,et al.  Pharmacological brake-release of mRNA translation enhances cognitive memory , 2013, eLife.

[16]  Ehud Cohen,et al.  Opposing Activities Protect Against Age-Onset Proteotoxicity , 2006, Science.

[17]  Sophie E Jackson,et al.  Knot formation in newly translated proteins is spontaneous and accelerated by chaperonins. , 2012, Nature chemical biology.

[18]  D. Agard,et al.  Glucocorticoid Receptor Function Regulated by Coordinated Action of the Hsp90 and Hsp70 Chaperone Cycles , 2014, Cell.

[19]  Marina V. Rodnina,et al.  Cotranslational protein folding on the ribosome monitored in real time , 2015, Science.

[20]  P. Brown,et al.  Defining the Specificity of Cotranslationally Acting Chaperones by Systematic Analysis of mRNAs Associated with Ribosome-Nascent Chain Complexes , 2011, PLoS biology.

[21]  Massimiliano Bonomi,et al.  Elucidating the mechanism of substrate recognition by the bacterial Hsp90 molecular chaperone. , 2014, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  Andrey Kosolapov,et al.  Tertiary Interactions within the Ribosomal Exit Tunnel , 2009, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[23]  Lorna J. Smith,et al.  Understanding protein folding via free-energy surfaces from theory and experiment. , 2000, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[24]  E. Deuerling,et al.  The principle of antagonism ensures protein targeting specificity at the endoplasmic reticulum , 2015, Science.

[25]  D. Mokranjac,et al.  Real‐time observation of the conformational dynamics of mitochondrial Hsp70 by spFRET , 2013, The EMBO journal.

[26]  Martin Hessling,et al.  The large conformational changes of Hsp90 are only weakly coupled to ATP hydrolysis , 2009, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[27]  J. Höhfeld,et al.  Chaperone-assisted degradation: multiple paths to destruction , 2010, Biological chemistry.

[28]  D. Hebert,et al.  Protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum. , 2013, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[29]  B. Bukau,et al.  Cooperation of Hsp70 and Hsp100 chaperone machines in protein disaggregation , 2015, Front. Mol. Biosci..

[30]  S. Radford,et al.  Protein folding occurs while bound to the ATP-independent chaperone Spy , 2015, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[31]  J. Gestwicki,et al.  Targeting Allosteric Control Mechanisms in Heat Shock Protein 70 (Hsp70). , 2016, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[32]  M. Mann,et al.  Widespread Proteome Remodeling and Aggregation in Aging C. elegans , 2015, Cell.

[33]  P. Christen,et al.  The kinetic parameters and energy cost of the Hsp70 chaperone as a polypeptide unfoldase. , 2010, Nature chemical biology.

[34]  R. Morimoto,et al.  Biological and chemical approaches to diseases of proteostasis deficiency. , 2009, Annual review of biochemistry.

[35]  Peter Breuer,et al.  Cellular toxicity of polyglutamine expansion proteins: mechanism of transcription factor deactivation. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[36]  H. Taguchi Reaction Cycle of Chaperonin GroEL via Symmetric "Football" Intermediate. , 2015, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  K. Shokat,et al.  Endoplasmic reticulum stress-independent activation of unfolded protein response kinases by a small molecule ATP-mimic , 2015, eLife.

[38]  István A. Kovács,et al.  Widespread Macromolecular Interaction Perturbations in Human Genetic Disorders , 2015, Cell.

[39]  S. Rüdiger,et al.  Hsp90 interaction with clients. , 2015, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[40]  R. Riek,et al.  Cotranslational structure acquisition of nascent polypeptides monitored by NMR spectroscopy , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  C. Hughes,et al.  Heterogeneous binding of the SH3 client protein to the DnaK molecular chaperone , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Judith Frydman,et al.  Evolutionary conservation of codon optimality reveals hidden signatures of co-translational folding , 2012, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[43]  P. Bork,et al.  Operon structure and cotranslational subunit association direct protein assembly in bacteria , 2015, Science.

[44]  Soo-Jung Kim,et al.  Translational tuning optimizes nascent protein folding in cells , 2015, Science.

[45]  V. Uversky,et al.  Structural, morphological, and functional diversity of amyloid oligomers , 2015, FEBS letters.

[46]  Daniel N. Wilson,et al.  The ribosomal tunnel as a functional environment for nascent polypeptide folding and translational stalling. , 2011, Current opinion in structural biology.

[47]  C. Kalodimos,et al.  Structural Basis for Protein Antiaggregation Activity of the Trigger Factor Chaperone , 2014, Science.

[48]  Zackary N Scholl,et al.  Chaperones Rescue Luciferase Folding by Separating Its Domains* , 2014, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[49]  C. Dobson,et al.  Protein misfolding, functional amyloid, and human disease. , 2006, Annual review of biochemistry.

[50]  M. Mann,et al.  Quantitative Proteomics Reveals That Hsp90 Inhibition Preferentially Targets Kinases and the DNA Damage Response* , 2011, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[51]  J. Frydman,et al.  The Cotranslational Function of Ribosome-Associated Hsp70 in Eukaryotic Protein Homeostasis , 2013, Cell.

[52]  J. Kelly,et al.  A current pharmacologic agent versus the promise of next generation therapeutics to ameliorate protein misfolding and/or aggregation diseases. , 2016, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[53]  J. Frydman,et al.  Spatial sequestration of misfolded proteins by a dynamic chaperone pathway enhances cellular fitness to stress , 2013, Nature Cell Biology.

[54]  Cole M. Haynes,et al.  UPR(mt)-mediated cytoprotection and organismal aging. , 2015, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[55]  H. Rye,et al.  The C-terminal Tails of the Bacterial Chaperonin GroEL Stimulate Protein Folding by Directly Altering the Conformation of a Substrate Protein* , 2014, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[56]  A. Barducci,et al.  Hsp70 chaperones are non-equilibrium machines that achieve ultra-affinity by energy consumption , 2014, eLife.

[57]  A. Minton,et al.  Protein aggregation in crowded environments , 2006, Biological chemistry.

[58]  Michele Vendruscolo,et al.  New scenarios of protein folding can occur on the ribosome. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[59]  A. Varshavsky,et al.  Control of protein quality and stoichiometries by N-terminal acetylation and the N-end rule pathway. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[60]  F. Hartl,et al.  Molecular Chaperones in the Cytosol: from Nascent Chain to Folded Protein , 2002, Science.

[61]  E. Deuerling,et al.  Ribosome-associated chaperones as key players in proteostasis. , 2012, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[62]  M. Hayer‐Hartl,et al.  Active cage mechanism of chaperonin-assisted protein folding demonstrated at single-molecule level. , 2014, Journal of molecular biology.

[63]  Sebastian A. Leidel,et al.  Optimization of Codon Translation Rates via tRNA Modifications Maintains Proteome Integrity , 2015, Cell.

[64]  D. Rubinsztein,et al.  Transcriptional abnormalities in Huntington disease. , 2003, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[65]  Matthew S. Sachs,et al.  Non-optimal codon usage affects expression , structure and function of clock protein FRQ , 2013 .

[66]  L. Joachimiak,et al.  A gradient of ATP affinities generates an asymmetric power stroke driving the chaperonin TRIC/CCT folding cycle. , 2012, Cell reports.

[67]  F. Hartl,et al.  Active Cage Mechanism of Chaperonin-Assisted Protein Folding Demonstrated at Single-Molecule Level , 2014 .

[68]  F. Hartl,et al.  PolyQ Proteins Interfere with Nuclear Degradation of Cytosolic Proteins by Sequestering the Sis1p Chaperone , 2013, Cell.

[69]  Ville R. I. Kaila,et al.  Conformational processing of oncogenic v-Src kinase by the molecular chaperone Hsp90 , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[70]  Lesley Page,et al.  Increased proteasome activity in human embryonic stem cells is regulated by PSMD11 , 2012, Nature.

[71]  Wolfgang Baumeister,et al.  The three-dimensional organization of polyribosomes in intact human cells. , 2010, Molecular cell.

[72]  J. Frydman,et al.  Principles of cotranslational ubiquitination and quality control at the ribosome. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[73]  Helen R Saibil,et al.  Structure and allostery of the chaperonin GroEL. , 2013, Journal of molecular biology.

[74]  Andrew D. Mathis,et al.  Structures of the Gβ-CCT and PhLP1–Gβ-CCT complexes reveal a mechanism for G-protein β-subunit folding and Gβγ dimer assembly , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[75]  D. Garza,et al.  Firefly luciferase mutants as sensors of proteome stress , 2011, Nature Methods.

[76]  Arturo Muga,et al.  The structure of CCT–Hsc70NBD suggests a mechanism for Hsp70 delivery of substrates to the chaperonin , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[77]  Michael Levitt,et al.  Subunit order of eukaryotic TRiC/CCT chaperonin by cross-linking, mass spectrometry, and combinatorial homology modeling , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[78]  K. Furtak,et al.  Extended survival of misfolded G85R SOD1-linked ALS mice by transgenic expression of chaperone Hsp110 , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[79]  A. Bracher,et al.  The nucleotide exchange factors of Hsp70 molecular chaperones , 2015, Front. Mol. Biosci..

[80]  M. Mann,et al.  Cytoplasmic protein aggregates interfere with nucleocytoplasmic transport of protein and RNA , 2016, Science.

[81]  E. Lander,et al.  Identification and characterization of essential genes in the human genome , 2015, Science.

[82]  N. Krogan,et al.  Pharmacological dimerization and activation of the exchange factor eIF2B antagonizes the integrated stress response , 2015, eLife.

[83]  J. Reuther,et al.  Not4‐dependent translational repression is important for cellular protein homeostasis in yeast , 2015, The EMBO journal.

[84]  L. Gierasch,et al.  How hsp70 molecular machines interact with their substrates to mediate diverse physiological functions. , 2015, Journal of molecular biology.

[85]  S. Lindquist,et al.  HSP90 at the hub of protein homeostasis: emerging mechanistic insights , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[86]  Julio O. Ortiz,et al.  The Native 3D Organization of Bacterial Polysomes , 2009, Cell.

[87]  A. Dillin,et al.  Endocrine aspects of organelle stress—cell non-autonomous signaling of mitochondria and the ER. , 2015, Current opinion in cell biology.

[88]  U. Fischer,et al.  Cellular strategies for the assembly of molecular machines. , 2010, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[89]  Jianlin Lei,et al.  Structural basis for interaction of a cotranslational chaperone with the eukaryotic ribosome , 2014, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[90]  J. Buchner,et al.  The chaperone Hsp90: changing partners for demanding clients. , 2013, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[91]  L. Sistonen,et al.  Regulation of HSF1 function in the heat stress response: implications in aging and disease. , 2011, Annual review of biochemistry.

[92]  Lisa M. Ryno,et al.  Unfolded protein response activation reduces secretion and extracellular aggregation of amyloidogenic immunoglobulin light chain , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[93]  R. Hegde,et al.  Ribosome-associated protein quality control , 2016, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[94]  Michele Vendruscolo,et al.  Amyloid-like Aggregates Sequester Numerous Metastable Proteins with Essential Cellular Functions , 2011, Cell.

[95]  F. Hartl,et al.  Real-time observation of trigger factor function on translating ribosomes , 2006, Nature.

[96]  D. Ng,et al.  A Nucleus-based Quality Control Mechanism for Cytosolic Proteins , 2010, Molecular biology of the cell.

[97]  E. Mandelkow,et al.  Hsp90-Tau Complex Reveals Molecular Basis for Specificity in Chaperone Action , 2014, Cell.

[98]  F. Hartl,et al.  Folding of large multidomain proteins by partial encapsulation in the chaperonin TRiC/CCT , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[99]  C. Anfinsen Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. , 1973, Science.

[100]  J. Yates,et al.  The Rqc2/Tae2 subunit of the ribosome-associated quality control (RQC) complex marks ribosome-stalled nascent polypeptide chains for aggregation , 2016, eLife.

[101]  D. Agard,et al.  Substrate binding drives large-scale conformational changes in the Hsp90 molecular chaperone. , 2011, Molecular cell.

[102]  F. Hartl,et al.  Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Fakultät für Chemie und Pharmazie der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Structural Features of the GroEL-GroES Nano-Cage Required for Rapid Folding of Encapsulated Protein , 2007 .

[103]  Amy L. Robertson,et al.  A structural ensemble of a ribosome-nascent chain complex during co-translational protein folding , 2016, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[104]  R. Vabulas,et al.  Protein Synthesis upon Acute Nutrient Restriction Relies on Proteasome Function , 2005, Science.

[105]  Daniel K. Clare,et al.  ATP-Triggered Conformational Changes Delineate Substrate-Binding and -Folding Mechanics of the GroEL Chaperonin , 2012, Cell.

[106]  F. Hartl,et al.  Structure and function of Hip, an attenuator of the Hsp70 chaperone cycle , 2013, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[107]  Kim Schneider,et al.  Preventing proteostasis diseases by selective inhibition of a phosphatase regulatory subunit , 2015, Science.

[108]  J. Gestwicki,et al.  Targeting Hsp90/Hsp70-based protein quality control for treatment of adult onset neurodegenerative diseases. , 2015, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[109]  M. Mann,et al.  Widespread Proteome Remodeling and Aggregation in Aging C. elegans , 2017, Cell.

[110]  Marc Vidal,et al.  A chaperome subnetwork safeguards proteostasis in aging and neurodegenerative disease. , 2014, Cell reports.

[111]  F. Schmid,et al.  Prolyl isomerization and its catalysis in protein folding and protein function. , 2015, Journal of molecular biology.

[112]  F. Hartl,et al.  Action of the Hsp70 chaperone system observed with single proteins , 2015, Nature Communications.

[113]  F. Hartl Molecular chaperones in cellular protein folding , 1996, Nature.

[114]  F. Hartl,et al.  Function of Trigger Factor and DnaK in Multidomain Protein Folding Increase in Yield at the Expense of Folding Speed , 2004, Cell.

[115]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  The Structural Basis of Substrate Recognition by the Eukaryotic Chaperonin TRiC/CCT , 2014, Cell.

[116]  D. Agard,et al.  Hsp70 Forms Antiparallel Dimers Stabilized by Post-translational Modifications to Position Clients for Transfer to Hsp90 , 2015, Cell reports.

[117]  D. Rubinsztein,et al.  Therapeutic targeting of autophagy in neurodegenerative and infectious diseases , 2015, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[118]  Lila M. Gierasch,et al.  Substrate-binding domain conformational dynamics mediate Hsp70 allostery , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[119]  J. Carver,et al.  Small heat-shock proteins: important players in regulating cellular proteostasis , 2015, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[120]  Annika Scior,et al.  The nascent polypeptide‐associated complex is a key regulator of proteostasis , 2013, The EMBO journal.

[121]  M. Mayer,et al.  Hsp70 chaperone dynamics and molecular mechanism. , 2013, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[122]  Roman Kityk,et al.  Structure and dynamics of the ATP-bound open conformation of Hsp70 chaperones. , 2012, Molecular cell.

[123]  G. von Heijne,et al.  Trigger Factor Reduces the Force Exerted on the Nascent Chain by a Cotranslationally Folding Protein. , 2016, Journal of molecular biology.

[124]  J. Frydman,et al.  The Mechanism and Function of Group II Chaperonins. , 2015, Journal of molecular biology.

[125]  Michele Vendruscolo,et al.  Kinetic modelling indicates that fast-translating codons can coordinate cotranslational protein folding by avoiding misfolded intermediates , 2014, Nature Communications.

[126]  Y. Miyata,et al.  The therapeutic target Hsp90 and cancer hallmarks. , 2012, Current pharmaceutical design.

[127]  Min Jae Lee,et al.  Enhancement of Proteasome Activity by a Small-Molecule Inhibitor of Usp14 , 2010, Nature.

[128]  Martin Hessling,et al.  Dissection of the ATP-induced conformational cycle of the molecular chaperone Hsp90 , 2009, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[129]  F. Hartl,et al.  Protein quality control during aging involves recruitment of the macroautophagy pathway by BAG3 , 2009, The EMBO journal.

[130]  Bernd Bukau,et al.  Metazoan Hsp70 machines use Hsp110 to power protein disaggregation. , 2012, The EMBO journal.

[131]  Bruce L. Miller,et al.  GGGGCC repeat expansion in C9orf72 compromises nucleocytoplasmic transport , 2015, Nature.

[132]  A. Hill,et al.  SERF Protein Is a Direct Modifier of Amyloid Fiber Assembly , 2012, Cell reports.

[133]  J. Weissman,et al.  Selective Ribosome Profiling Reveals the Cotranslational Chaperone Action of Trigger Factor In Vivo , 2011, Cell.

[134]  G. von Heijne,et al.  Cotranslational Protein Folding inside the Ribosome Exit Tunnel , 2015, Cell reports.

[135]  Susan Lindquist,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Hsp90-Client Interactions Reveals Principles of Substrate Recognition , 2012, Cell.

[136]  S. Rospert,et al.  NAC functions as a modulator of SRP during the early steps of protein targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum , 2012, Molecular biology of the cell.

[137]  F. Hartl,et al.  Chaperonin-Catalyzed Rescue of Kinetically Trapped States in Protein Folding , 2010, Cell.

[138]  M. Levitt,et al.  The crystal structures of the eukaryotic chaperonin CCT reveal its functional partitioning. , 2013, Structure.

[139]  H. Taguchi,et al.  A systematic survey of in vivo obligate chaperonin‐dependent substrates , 2010, The EMBO journal.

[140]  A. Amon,et al.  Aneuploidy: implications for protein homeostasis and disease , 2014, Disease Models & Mechanisms.

[141]  D. J. Naylor,et al.  Proteome-wide Analysis of Chaperonin-Dependent Protein Folding in Escherichia coli , 2005, Cell.

[142]  M. Bolognesi,et al.  Function and Structure of Inherently Disordered Proteins This Review Comes from a Themed Issue on Proteins Edited Prediction of Non-folding Proteins and Regions Frequency of Disordered Regions Protein Evolution Partitioning Unstructured Proteins and Regions into Groups Involvement of Inherently Diso , 2022 .

[143]  Marco Y. Hein,et al.  A Liquid-to-Solid Phase Transition of the ALS Protein FUS Accelerated by Disease Mutation , 2015, Cell.

[144]  Richard I. Morimoto,et al.  Adapting Proteostasis for Disease Intervention , 2008, Science.

[145]  Yong Tae Kwon,et al.  Degradation of misfolded proteins in neurodegenerative diseases: therapeutic targets and strategies , 2015, Experimental & Molecular Medicine.

[146]  J. Buchner,et al.  Asymmetric activation of the hsp90 dimer by its cochaperone aha1. , 2010, Molecular cell.

[147]  L. Kay,et al.  Hsp70 biases the folding pathways of client proteins , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[148]  Garry R. Cutting,et al.  From CFTR biology toward combinatorial pharmacotherapy: expanded classification of cystic fibrosis mutations , 2016, Molecular biology of the cell.

[149]  Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S8 Table S1 Movies S1 to S3 a " Silent " Polymorphism in the Mdr1 Gene Changes Substrate Specificity Corrected 30 November 2007; See Last Page , 2022 .

[150]  J. Buchner,et al.  Mixed Hsp90–cochaperone complexes are important for the progression of the reaction cycle , 2011, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[151]  R. Hampton,et al.  Cytoplasmic protein quality control degradation mediated by parallel actions of the E3 ubiquitin ligases Ubr1 and San1 , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[152]  Andreas Bracher,et al.  The molecular architecture of the eukaryotic chaperonin TRiC/CCT. , 2012, Structure.

[153]  A. Horwich,et al.  The GroEL/GroES cis cavity as a passive anti‐aggregation device , 2009, FEBS letters.

[154]  S. Radford,et al.  Energy landscapes of functional proteins are inherently risky. , 2014, Nature chemical biology.

[155]  P. Fischer,et al.  Mutations in a translation initiation factor identify the target of a memory-enhancing compound , 2015, Science.

[156]  R. Andino,et al.  Defining Hsp70 Subnetworks in Dengue Virus Replication Reveals Key Vulnerability in Flavivirus Infection , 2015, Cell.

[157]  Michael H. Schwartz,et al.  Reversible, Specific, Active Aggregates of Endogenous Proteins Assemble upon Heat Stress , 2015, Cell.

[158]  R. Morimoto,et al.  The biology of proteostasis in aging and disease. , 2015, Annual review of biochemistry.

[159]  H. Rye,et al.  GroEL stimulates protein folding through forced unfolding , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[160]  Tuomas P. J. Knowles,et al.  An Analytical Solution to the Kinetics of Breakable Filament Assembly , 2009, Science.

[161]  A. Horovitz,et al.  Sequential ATP-induced allosteric transitions of the cytoplasmic chaperonin containing TCP-1 revealed by EM analysis , 2005, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[162]  Wayne A Hendrickson,et al.  Allosteric opening of the polypeptide-binding site when an Hsp70 binds ATP , 2013, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[163]  M. Hipp,et al.  Proteostasis impairment in protein-misfolding and -aggregation diseases. , 2014, Trends in cell biology.

[164]  F. Hartl,et al.  DnaK functions as a central hub in the E. coli chaperone network. , 2012, Cell reports.

[165]  D. Ron,et al.  Selective Inhibition of a Regulatory Subunit of Protein Phosphatase 1 Restores Proteostasis , 2011, Science.

[166]  Daniel Kaganovich,et al.  Misfolded proteins partition between two distinct quality control compartments , 2008, Nature.

[167]  S. Misra,et al.  A bipartite interaction between Hsp70 and CHIP regulates ubiquitination of chaperoned client proteins. , 2015, Structure.

[168]  J. Buchner,et al.  The Hsp90 chaperone machinery: conformational dynamics and regulation by co-chaperones. , 2012, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[169]  Jane Clarke,et al.  Transient misfolding dominates multidomain protein folding , 2015, Nature Communications.

[170]  F. Hartl,et al.  Monitoring Protein Conformation along the Pathway of Chaperonin-Assisted Folding , 2008, Cell.

[171]  F. Hartl,et al.  Role of auxiliary proteins in Rubisco biogenesis and function , 2015, Nature Plants.

[172]  S. Tans,et al.  Reshaping of the conformational search of a protein by the chaperone trigger factor , 2013, Nature.

[173]  Monica A. Chalfant,et al.  Small Molecule Proteostasis Regulators for Protein Conformational Diseases , 2011, Nature chemical biology.

[174]  L. Kay,et al.  Mapping the conformation of a client protein through the Hsp70 functional cycle , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[175]  W. Chiu,et al.  Dual Action of ATP Hydrolysis Couples Lid Closure to Substrate Release into the Group II Chaperonin Chamber , 2011, Cell.

[176]  F. Hartl,et al.  The GroEL-GroES Chaperonin Machine: A Nano-Cage for Protein Folding. , 2016, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[177]  B. Barak,et al.  ER Stress-Induced eIF2-alpha Phosphorylation Underlies Sensitivity of Striatal Neurons to Pathogenic Huntingtin , 2014, PloS one.

[178]  C. Dobson,et al.  Widespread aggregation and neurodegenerative diseases are associated with supersaturated proteins. , 2013, Cell reports.

[179]  B. Bukau,et al.  Concerted action of the ribosome and the associated chaperone trigger factor confines nascent polypeptide folding. , 2012, Molecular cell.

[180]  S. Rospert,et al.  Ribosome-Associated Complex and Ssb Are Required for Translational Repression Induced by Polylysine Segments within Nascent Chains , 2012, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[181]  S. Richard,et al.  Emerging Roles of Disordered Sequences in RNA-Binding Proteins. , 2015, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[182]  Sheena E Radford,et al.  Intermediates: ubiquitous species on folding energy landscapes? , 2007, Current opinion in structural biology.

[183]  C. Dobson,et al.  The S/T-Rich Motif in the DNAJB6 Chaperone Delays Polyglutamine Aggregation and the Onset of Disease in a Mouse Model. , 2016, Molecular cell.

[184]  Gene-Wei Li,et al.  The anti-Shine-Dalgarno sequence drives translational pausing and codon choice in bacteria , 2012, Nature.

[185]  Elizabeth A Miller,et al.  Collapse of proteostasis represents an early molecular event in Caenorhabditis elegans aging , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[186]  Mark R. Segal,et al.  Inclusion body formation reduces levels of mutant huntingtin and the risk of neuronal death , 2004, Nature.

[187]  H. Kampinga,et al.  The HSP70 chaperone machinery: J proteins as drivers of functional specificity , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[188]  J. Frydman,et al.  Sorting out the trash: the spatial nature of eukaryotic protein quality control. , 2014, Current opinion in cell biology.